However, in many ways, the solutions have not solved the problem. For instance, it is my view that the re-parking prohibitions are an unmitigated disaster. I have not seen it free up parking spots, what it does do is preclude long term parking and people from therefore doing longer term shopping or entertainment stops. That I think is the opposite of what you want to achieve.
Last year we discovered that this policy worked so well that it reduced the amount of parking tickets and therefore cut into the city’s revenue.
This week we learn that the DDBA is in agreement that a solution to the parking in downtown is to meter the parking in the E Street Plaza. By itself, it is not a bad idea, I come from a city that has metered parking, but in order to provide enough of it, they had to build not one but two parking garages on both sides of the downtown and expand one of them.
The metering might provide some revenue, but I fail to see how it is going to deal with the broader problems of parking.
In isolation this problem would be somewhat of an annoyance. However, time is ticking so to speak because at some point there will be built Target out by Mace and Second Street with presumably a large amount of parking. That will take business from our downtown core. As some fear, the combination of parking problems and cheap merchandise at Target may imperil our downtown. And yet there does not seem to be a real sense of urgency among either the council or the downtown on this front.
Adding to the parking problems is the Amtrak Station that is attracting numerous out-of-town parkers who come here from the convenient and easy parking, leaving the residents of Davis high and dry.
We have a parking facility in the downtown, but in my view it is not located in the proper spot. It is on G and Fourth Street. That puts it on the east side of downtown and away from the main traffic flows and off the main track.
The parking situation calls for some more innovative solutions. We need to find a way to get parking into a central and convenient location, where it is easy for the traffic to access and easy for the pedestrians to walk to the rest of downtown.
This should not be an impossible problem. This past week, I had Matt Rexroad on the radio show, he mentioned problems with Woodland’s downtown, namely that it was one long strip. Davis has a good compact downtown that should be walkable if you can find the right location to locate your parking that is.
At the end of the day, parking perhaps even more than Target or even combined with Target might be the biggest threat to the vitality of our downtown and that would be a shame because the downtown has the potential to be a really great community asset.
—Doug Paul Davis reporting
“The Downtown?” Hey, let’s put a roof over the area between Fourth and First, E and G Streets and call it “The Downtown Mall.”
“The Downtown?” Hey, let’s put a roof over the area between Fourth and First, E and G Streets and call it “The Downtown Mall.”
“The Downtown?” Hey, let’s put a roof over the area between Fourth and First, E and G Streets and call it “The Downtown Mall.”
“The Downtown?” Hey, let’s put a roof over the area between Fourth and First, E and G Streets and call it “The Downtown Mall.”
It’s interesting that parking downtown is perceived as a “problem” when just the opposite is true. Every successful downtown has a parking challenge. The only way to truly impact it is to encourage more people to walk or bike and/or to create some shuttle or form of public
transit. Don’t you find it interesting for example that in a place that prides itself on being a “bicycle capitol” there are no bike taxis or other forms of commercial bike traffic? You could build parking garages till you’re blue in the face and it won’t make a dent.
You should:
a.) Make people pay for parking as the DDBA has endorsed.
b.) Recognize that the limited parking is, in itself, a sign of success.
Davis has the most successful small town downtown in the entire Central Valley. It’s time to wake up and recognize that…of course it’s primarily due to the presence of 30,000 univ. students but it still works!
And don’t whine about the train riders. Yes, parking is impacted but the notion that they’re all from out of town is way overblown.
Thanks!
It’s interesting that parking downtown is perceived as a “problem” when just the opposite is true. Every successful downtown has a parking challenge. The only way to truly impact it is to encourage more people to walk or bike and/or to create some shuttle or form of public
transit. Don’t you find it interesting for example that in a place that prides itself on being a “bicycle capitol” there are no bike taxis or other forms of commercial bike traffic? You could build parking garages till you’re blue in the face and it won’t make a dent.
You should:
a.) Make people pay for parking as the DDBA has endorsed.
b.) Recognize that the limited parking is, in itself, a sign of success.
Davis has the most successful small town downtown in the entire Central Valley. It’s time to wake up and recognize that…of course it’s primarily due to the presence of 30,000 univ. students but it still works!
And don’t whine about the train riders. Yes, parking is impacted but the notion that they’re all from out of town is way overblown.
Thanks!
It’s interesting that parking downtown is perceived as a “problem” when just the opposite is true. Every successful downtown has a parking challenge. The only way to truly impact it is to encourage more people to walk or bike and/or to create some shuttle or form of public
transit. Don’t you find it interesting for example that in a place that prides itself on being a “bicycle capitol” there are no bike taxis or other forms of commercial bike traffic? You could build parking garages till you’re blue in the face and it won’t make a dent.
You should:
a.) Make people pay for parking as the DDBA has endorsed.
b.) Recognize that the limited parking is, in itself, a sign of success.
Davis has the most successful small town downtown in the entire Central Valley. It’s time to wake up and recognize that…of course it’s primarily due to the presence of 30,000 univ. students but it still works!
And don’t whine about the train riders. Yes, parking is impacted but the notion that they’re all from out of town is way overblown.
Thanks!
It’s interesting that parking downtown is perceived as a “problem” when just the opposite is true. Every successful downtown has a parking challenge. The only way to truly impact it is to encourage more people to walk or bike and/or to create some shuttle or form of public
transit. Don’t you find it interesting for example that in a place that prides itself on being a “bicycle capitol” there are no bike taxis or other forms of commercial bike traffic? You could build parking garages till you’re blue in the face and it won’t make a dent.
You should:
a.) Make people pay for parking as the DDBA has endorsed.
b.) Recognize that the limited parking is, in itself, a sign of success.
Davis has the most successful small town downtown in the entire Central Valley. It’s time to wake up and recognize that…of course it’s primarily due to the presence of 30,000 univ. students but it still works!
And don’t whine about the train riders. Yes, parking is impacted but the notion that they’re all from out of town is way overblown.
Thanks!
l agree!
And l think the ‘experiment’ which will spread to all downown may make it worse in that Council’s plan is to allow unlimited metered parking…so you can have less turnover. l used to work downtown, with an X permit, but many of my fellow officemates would repark multiple times…they will be glad to pay the $1/hr…..
How effective have the red light cameras been, anyone know in terms of revenue, paying for themselves.
AND PLEASE no scrolling sign in S Davis. PLEASE don’t allow Don Saylor to railroad this in the name of our schools!
l agree!
And l think the ‘experiment’ which will spread to all downown may make it worse in that Council’s plan is to allow unlimited metered parking…so you can have less turnover. l used to work downtown, with an X permit, but many of my fellow officemates would repark multiple times…they will be glad to pay the $1/hr…..
How effective have the red light cameras been, anyone know in terms of revenue, paying for themselves.
AND PLEASE no scrolling sign in S Davis. PLEASE don’t allow Don Saylor to railroad this in the name of our schools!
l agree!
And l think the ‘experiment’ which will spread to all downown may make it worse in that Council’s plan is to allow unlimited metered parking…so you can have less turnover. l used to work downtown, with an X permit, but many of my fellow officemates would repark multiple times…they will be glad to pay the $1/hr…..
How effective have the red light cameras been, anyone know in terms of revenue, paying for themselves.
AND PLEASE no scrolling sign in S Davis. PLEASE don’t allow Don Saylor to railroad this in the name of our schools!
l agree!
And l think the ‘experiment’ which will spread to all downown may make it worse in that Council’s plan is to allow unlimited metered parking…so you can have less turnover. l used to work downtown, with an X permit, but many of my fellow officemates would repark multiple times…they will be glad to pay the $1/hr…..
How effective have the red light cameras been, anyone know in terms of revenue, paying for themselves.
AND PLEASE no scrolling sign in S Davis. PLEASE don’t allow Don Saylor to railroad this in the name of our schools!
l agree!
And l think the ‘experiment’ which will spread to all downown may make it worse in that Council’s plan is to allow unlimited metered parking…so you can have less turnover. l used to work downtown, with an X permit, but many of my fellow officemates would repark multiple times…they will be glad to pay the $1/hr…..
How effective have the red light cameras been, anyone know in terms of revenue, paying for themselves.
AND PLEASE no scrolling sign in S Davis. PLEASE don’t allow Don Saylor to railroad this in the name of our schools!
l agree!
And l think the ‘experiment’ which will spread to all downown may make it worse in that Council’s plan is to allow unlimited metered parking…so you can have less turnover. l used to work downtown, with an X permit, but many of my fellow officemates would repark multiple times…they will be glad to pay the $1/hr…..
How effective have the red light cameras been, anyone know in terms of revenue, paying for themselves.
AND PLEASE no scrolling sign in S Davis. PLEASE don’t allow Don Saylor to railroad this in the name of our schools!
l agree!
And l think the ‘experiment’ which will spread to all downown may make it worse in that Council’s plan is to allow unlimited metered parking…so you can have less turnover. l used to work downtown, with an X permit, but many of my fellow officemates would repark multiple times…they will be glad to pay the $1/hr…..
How effective have the red light cameras been, anyone know in terms of revenue, paying for themselves.
AND PLEASE no scrolling sign in S Davis. PLEASE don’t allow Don Saylor to railroad this in the name of our schools!
l agree!
And l think the ‘experiment’ which will spread to all downown may make it worse in that Council’s plan is to allow unlimited metered parking…so you can have less turnover. l used to work downtown, with an X permit, but many of my fellow officemates would repark multiple times…they will be glad to pay the $1/hr…..
How effective have the red light cameras been, anyone know in terms of revenue, paying for themselves.
AND PLEASE no scrolling sign in S Davis. PLEASE don’t allow Don Saylor to railroad this in the name of our schools!
I either time my trips to be short, or just bike. Usually bike. No charge or time limit for bike parking.
I either time my trips to be short, or just bike. Usually bike. No charge or time limit for bike parking.
I either time my trips to be short, or just bike. Usually bike. No charge or time limit for bike parking.