“Saving California Communities: Starting Here!” – a Davis community event
SCC will host Saving California Communities: Starting Here!, a Davis community conversation to explore possibilities and begin…
SCC will host Saving California Communities: Starting Here!, a Davis community conversation to explore possibilities and begin…
The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and other Cmunicipalities through their organization TANC (Transmission Agency of Northern…
The following is the text of my comments to Council on Tuesday night:
As Councilmember Sue Greenwald said on multiple occasions last week, the council’s discussion completely ignored the largest sources of expenditures and the areas that we must address, not only to close the multi-year, multi-million dollar deficit, but to address the structural issues that underlie our current predicament.
By E. Roberts Musser – The current political mantra at both the federal level and here in the state of California is the perceived need for “universal health care”. It is seen as the solution to the crucial issue of health care reform. Rather the more important question should be: “Is universal health care the answer to rising health care costs and the ever increasing number of uninsured, or are there other options to consider that might be better?”
The city council last night’s discussion of water and what to do about water continues. And while it appears we have learned a few things, the basic trajectory of water discussion remains undisturbed, this despite city staff’s apparent inability to know or address even whether this will actually in the end yield water for the city.
The unfortunate aspect of this evening was that the people commissioned to do the independent review of the water resources initiatives were unavailable to present the report and answer questions. That means the city had to rely on the public works department to continue to present their views of the viability of the project.

Once again we revisit the complete failure of the city’s last budget workshop. A good amount of insight can be gleaned from the way the school district has approached their budget the last two years.
We did not see a prolonged focus on small details. That is not to say the CBO of the School District, Bruce Colby has not tried to cut all of the marginal costs he can, because he did. But at the core, most of the school district’s cost goes to employees. That is the same issue facing the city as well. And so in order to cut substantial and meaningful amounts of money to balance a budget, there are really two places to go–employee salaries and positions. Anything else is really a waste of time.
Write in to ask questions of Jessica Rothhaar from Health Access –At present, there are competing health care bills working their way through the California Legislature. In addition, President Obama is working hard to find a way to pass national health care reform.
Despite Cost Cutting Measures City Staff Still Classifies Costs as “Daunting” –The council has two items on the agenda this week dealing with water.
Today we see an interesting article in the Davis Enterprise, which analyzes the growth issue. You remember the growth issue–the issue that used to be the most important issue facing the city of Davis. That was in the days before the bottom fell out of the housing market and the economy collapsed forcing the city to finally reckon with the issue of the budget and city salaries. Or at least those of us observing the city to try to force them to reckon with it even as they appear to be unusually stubborn.
The most important thing that we learn from the Enterprise article probably has little to do with its primary intent. It shows us the widening gap now between the thinking of Mayor Pro Tem Don Saylor and now even city staff. Already we have seen Mr. Saylor has moved far afield from the of his colleagues on the council. He was the only one to support without qualification the mixed-use project at Cannery Park. He was the only one to express lament at the exit of Cannery. And he was the only one to push for immediately doing a new and/ or updated General Plan.
Mayor Asmundson’s second tenure as Mayor has been somewhat less eventful than her first tenure that saw open civil unrest befall the city. However, more quietly she has effectively moved to stifle debate and dissent at least within official city hall.
Earlier this week the Los Angeles Times reported that a top school district official at the state’s largest school district is meeting with teachers who have broken ranks with their union to support pay cuts as a means to avoid layoffs.
Los Angeles faces budget cuts that amount to $700 million from their $6 billion general fund budget.
In a recent Davis Enterprise article, Davis Fire Chief Rose Conroy defended the four person fire crew. The article cites the 1998 OSHA “two in, two out” rule as a safety regulation for firefighters.
One question that comes to mind is what does this rule mean exactly? Are we required by this rule to carry four person engine units, or are there alternatives available for smaller departments like Davis to be safe but to be fiscally responsible at the same time?
On Tuesday night, the Davis City Council began looking into budget cuts. The city is of course facing a $3 million deficit in the coming fiscal year. The immediate crisis has been caused by declining tax receipts. But the longer term crisis is fueled by increasing salaries, rising pension costs, and the unfunded liabilities down the line that the city faces with retirement health care.
The most disappointing aspect of it is, is that instead of going head on against the bulk of city expenses, the large monies and obligations the city faces, two of the councilmembers–the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tem largely focused on minutiae.
A UC Davis professor is suing the University for racial discrimination, harassment and retaliation in relation to charges surrounding the handling of a grade dispute. The University is taking the extraordinary measure of using anti-SLAPP legislation as a means to quash a legitimate discrimination complaint. If successful, this could set a new precedent as a legal tool used by alleged offenders to effectively gut current anti-discrimination protections in the workplace.
Professor Branner in August of 2008 filed a lawsuit at the UC Regents and Vice Provost Horwitz alleging that their actions violated his rights and protections under California law.
Anyone who watched even a portion of the Davis City Council meeting last night saw some amazing maneuvers by some on the council along with the city manager to avoid the real tough issues and attempt to balance the budget by nickle and diming the city to death. In order to do justice to this, we are going to break this into multiple parts.
This first part will focus on a memorandum by City Manager Bill Emlen that pretty much proves he is missing the point. There is some serious denial going on in this city and it begins with the city manager. He writes:
A Conference in Davis, California – Saturday, April 25, 2009 DAVIS COMMUNITY TO HOST CONFERENCE ON LIVING…
Thursday and Friday, April 16 & 17 – The Consortium for Women and Research, in collaboration with…
It was a decision that was not automatic for First Term County Supervisor Matt Rexroad. In fact, there was a point where it seemed a good possibility that he would not run for re-election. He had told me that he could always run for Supervisor but his kids wouldn’t always be young. As he wrote in his blog on Saturday:“I had pretty much decided that I was not going to run for re-election to the Board of Supervisors. My family and business commitments were calling.”
Somewhat buried in the staff report on the current budget crisis is a rather bleak forecast that looks at the hit the city is likely to take with regards to its PERS contributions for the years 2010/11 and 2011/12. According to the staff report,
“The retirement plans provided through CalPERS are considered “defined benefit” plans such that, upon agreement on a specific benefit level, the employer and employees contribute annually funding amounts to CalPERS according to the contribution rates established by CalPERS through annual actuarial valuations which set the contribution rates for the succeeding fiscal year. CalPERS typically provides contracting agencies with their contribution rates in October for the following (July-June) fiscal year. As such, CalPERS contribution rates reflect roughly a two-year lag relative to “current” actuarial results.”
Today has been one of those days where I have several good ideas for a column, but no great ideas for a column. For example we have now had two horrific killings of police officers one of course down the road in Oakland and the other in Pittsburgh. There is not a great local angle on that fortunately, but it is pretty tragic, especially I guess some of the political biproduct that has crept into the latter incident.
There is some interesting legislation that finally looks at tackling runaway state salaries. Assemblymember Anthony Portantino has introduced legislation that looks to freeze salaries, benefits, overtime, and compensation for those who make over $150,000. One group not directly addressed in this are UC Employees. The numbers are staggering at the top end. Well publicized is President Mark Yudof getting an annual salary last year of over $800,000.