Vanguard View: No Good Reason To Change Measure J
The purpose of Measure J was to give citizens the ultimate say any time the city expanded beyond its current boundaries or converted agricultural land into urban use. The Measure has been used exactly twice and both times the proposals were resoundingly defeated. First in 2005, the Covell Village proposal lost by a 60-40 margin. And most recently in November of this year, the Wildhorse Ranch Proposal was defeated by an even larger 75-25 margin.
While I may have seen merit in the most recent proposal, the voters had the ultimate say and they resoundingly said that now is not the time for a new peripheral development and they probably said now is not the time for more houses at all. I do not see any tweaking of this process that would have changed the result. The people spoke and Measure J may not have produced my preferred outcome, but it reflected the will of those who caste their votes in November.
Stunned is probably a good word for my reaction to reading a Sunday Op-Ed in the San Jose Mercury News from the President of the San Jose Fire Fighters, IAFF Local 230. He was responding to an op-ed that had been in the Mercury News back on November 4, 2009.
The parents of Ricardo Abrahams have settled a portion of their law suit, the portion that sued the city of Woodland and four police officers for the tasering incident on May 28, 2008 where Mr. Abrahams eventually died not from the Taser strikes but rather from positional asphyxia–being improperly handcuffed in a prone position. The coroner concluded that the weight of the victim contributed to his death.


By E. Roberts Musser (private citizen) – 
