- He exposes how children of color are still being charged as adults, while police officers and corporations walk free — a raw and urgent reminder that reform without accountability is just theater.
When justice only applies to the powerful — that’s not justice at all. 💥
In this unfiltered episode, activist George Galvis joins Pamela Price for a blistering conversation about double standards in the justice system. Galvis takes aim at Alameda County’s appointed District Attorney, accusing her of upholding a “Just-US system, not a justice system.” He exposes how children of color are still being charged as adults, while police officers and corporations walk free — a raw and urgent reminder that reform without accountability is just theater.
Then in Legally Speaking, Pamela dives into the escalating legal storm surrounding Donald Trump’s weaponization of the Department of Justice. She breaks down how Trump has turned prosecution into a political weapon, targeting former FBI Director James Comey and plotting to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James. The recent firing of U.S. Attorney Eric Siebert, Pamela argues, marks one of Trump’s most dangerous abuses of power yet.
And in Life in Trump’s America, Pamela unmasks the hypocrisy and racism behind right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk, whose self-styled “patriotism” has fueled division and hate across the country.
It’s a fiery, truth-telling episode — one that asks listeners to confront what real justice looks like in a system built to protect privilege.
Follow the Vanguard on Social Media – X, Instagram and Facebook. Subscribe the Vanguard News letters. To make a tax-deductible donation, please visit davisvanguard.org/donate or give directly through ActBlue. Your support will ensure that the vital work of the Vanguard continues.
“And in Life in Trump’s America, Pamela unmasks the hypocrisy and racism behind right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk, whose self-styled “patriotism” has fueled division and hate across the country.”
How so? I saw him speak at UC Davis and saw someone willing to have a discussion with his opponents and come to find points of agreement and disagreement. I know a lot of people hate him for influencing young people and having a role in bringing young voters to vote for Trump. But “hypocrisy and racism . . . . fueled division and hate” ??? That’s not what I saw in his Q&A. You can watch it online yourself. I’m not going to take the time to listen to this podcast, but seriously???!!!
As usual, most of those who claim that someone else is spewing racist or hate-filled speech don’t even refer to any citation.
I’ve watched several videos of Charlie Kirk debating students and others, and did not see anything that can even be remotely described as racist or hate-filled.
The fact that a recalled DA is making these type of statements is cause for concern, regarding how she even got elected in the first place. No self-reflection whatsoever, in regard to her own recall.
There is no changing these type of people – they are hard-wired regarding their views, for the rest of their life.