WOODLAND, CA – The defense argued that language barriers distorted key testimony and led to conflicting accounts in a Yolo County assault case, making it difficult to determine what actually happened between the accused and his spouse.
During the preliminary hearing, a police officer testified that the spouse of the accused appeared bruised and distressed, and a neighbor who called the police reported hearing cries for help. Deputy District Attorney Gustavo Figueroa argued that this showed clear signs of abuse. The neighbor also reported seeing the accused standing over his spouse with “a shoe in his hand,” though it was unclear whether he had removed the shoe or was attempting to help her put it back on.
Deputy Public Defender Jailene Gutierrez explained that the spouse did not fully understand key words during questioning. Gutierrez said that words such as “fist,” combined with stress and medication, made communication even harder. The defense argued that the injuries were accidental and that the accused did not pose a public safety risk.
Gutierrez emphasized that the accused had no prior criminal history, was cooperative with authorities, and was not a danger to the community. She also noted that he left the scene only because the spouse told him to get gas, not to flee. The defense asked the court to refrain from issuing a holding order, arguing that the injuries were the result of a misunderstanding amplified by language barriers.
The prosecution maintained that the injuries were consistent with abuse and that the spouse appeared visibly distressed in body camera footage. Prosecutors argued that her statement about being hit should be taken seriously, reinforcing this point with the neighbor’s testimony describing her on the ground calling for help.
Judge Daniel P. Maguire acknowledged that the case raised “conflicts in the evidence” and that misunderstanding due to language played a significant role. Although the spouse declined an interpreter, it became apparent that her limited English may have affected how her statements were understood.
A holding order was issued, and the next court date was set for Nov. 17. The defense underscored how limited English proficiency can cause confusion, delay, and potential injustice for everyone involved when critical communication is lost in translation.
Follow the Vanguard on Social Media – X, Instagram and Facebook. Subscribe the Vanguard News letters. To make a tax-deductible donation, please visit davisvanguard.org/donate or give directly through ActBlue. Your support will ensure that the vital work of the Vanguard continues.
