Cuba developed a lung cancer vaccine.
A small island nation under economic siege for sixty years. A country the United States has tried to starve into submission. A place with limited resources and no friends in Washington. And they created a breakthrough medical treatment that saves lives.
While Cuba was doing that, the United States was jailing women for seeking abortions.
Japan runs bullet trains at two hundred miles per hour. They have for decades. The trains are clean, safe, and arrive on time. The system works because the nation decided it should work. A country that was firebombed into rubble, that had two nuclear weapons dropped on it, that started from zero built a transportation system that puts American infrastructure to shame.
While Japan was building trains, the United States was putting immigrants in camps.
China is planting forests. They are reclaiming desert. They are building green energy infrastructure at a scale the world has never seen. They are planning fifty years ahead while American politicians cannot plan past the next election cycle.
While China was planting forests, the United States was criminalizing homelessness.
Nordic nations guarantee healthcare, education through university, and the lowest child poverty rates in the developed world. They treat survival as a public utility. They decided that no citizen should die because they cannot afford a doctor.
While Nordic nations were investing in children, the United States was banning books.
Costa Rica runs on renewable energy. It protects biodiversity. It has no military because it chose to spend its resources on life rather than death. A small Central American nation with a fraction of American wealth made a decision that the United States refuses to make.
While Costa Rica was running on renewables, the United States was subsidizing oil companies.
New Zealand managed a pandemic response that saved thousands by acting early, following science, and protecting its people. The government trusted its citizens with information and its citizens trusted the government with their safety.
While New Zealand was protecting citizens, the United States was attacking trans youth.
You are told you live in the greatest nation on Earth. The “shining city on a hill.” The beacon of freedom. The leader of the free world. You have heard it so many times that it feels like truth rather than marketing.
The data tells a different story.
The United Nations has condemned US human rights violations. The European Union has issued travel warnings about American gun violence. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have documented failures that rival authoritarian regimes. Foreign press reports on American decline with a mix of pity and horror. The nations that used to look to America for leadership now look away.
The US is no longer the model other nations aspire to.
It is the warning they study.
But Americans cannot see it. The myth is too strong. The narrative of exceptionalism is taught in schools before children can question it, repeated in speeches until it becomes background noise, reinforced by media that profits from the story. It blinds people to the evidence. Other nations can look at the United States and see what it has become. Americans cannot see it because the myth is stronger than the data.
Exceptionalism is not pride.
It is a blindness that prevents correction.
The policies are not abstract. They have a body count.
Women bleed out in parking lots because doctors fear prosecution. Thirteen-year-olds are forced to carry pregnancies from rape while politicians talk about the sanctity of life. Doctors are threatened with prison for providing healthcare. The state claims to value life while it lets women die.
Homeless people are arrested for existing. Cities pass laws against sleeping in public. They destroy encampments without offering shelter. They criminalize poverty instead of solving it. The richest nation on Earth treats its poorest like criminals.
Immigrants die in detention centers. Children are separated from parents. Families are destroyed for the crime of seeking safety. The nation that claims to welcome the tired and poor puts them in cages.
Trans youth lose healthcare while being used as political props by people who have never met them. The suicide rate climbs. The politicians keep talking.
Children go to schools that cannot afford books while teachers buy supplies with their own paychecks and students learn in buildings that crumble. The nation spends billions on weapons it does not need while children learn in mold.
This is not a failure of resources.
The United States has more money than any nation in history. It has more technology. It has more people. It has more of everything except the will to use any of it for public good.
The will was sold.
Private prisons make money from immigrants in camps. Healthcare corporations profit from denied claims. Defense contractors grow rich on endless war. Landlords profit from housing scarcity. Insurance companies profit from denied care. The choice to build public housing is a choice to eliminate landlord profits. The choice to provide healthcare is a choice to eliminate insurance profits. The choice to house the homeless is a choice to eliminate real estate speculation.
Competence threatens profit.
Cruelty protects it.
This is not a mystery. It is not an accident. It is not a puzzle to be solved. The United States watches other nations solve problems and chooses to create them instead.
Cuba develops vaccines because the state prioritizes science over shareholder value. Japan builds trains because the state prioritizes infrastructure over quarterly returns. China plants forests because the state prioritizes the future over the next election. Nordic nations invest in children because the state prioritizes life over profit. Costa Rica runs on renewables because the state prioritizes survival over oil company donations.
The United States does none of this.
The state prioritizes profit.
The choice is deliberate.
The mechanism is clear.
The result is visible.
You are watching a superpower commit suicide. Not from outside pressure. Not from enemy action. From inside rot. From a decision to let the public die so the private can grow.
Cuba has a lung cancer vaccine.
Japan has trains that run.
China has forests.
Nordic nations have healthy children.
Costa Rica has clean energy.
New Zealand has public safety.
The United States has the most powerful military in human history, the largest prison population in the world, the highest healthcare costs on the planet, and a body count that grows every single day.
The question is not whether the United States can do better.
The question is whether it wants to.
The evidence says no.
Follow the Vanguard on Social Media – X, Instagram and Facebook. Subscribe the Vanguard News letters. To make a tax-deductible donation, please visit davisvanguard.org/donate or give directly through ActBlue. Your support will ensure that the vital work of the Vanguard continues.
This article tries to construct a moral narrative using unrelated contrasts. It cherrypicks a strength of a country and compares it to an unrelated weakness in America totally ignoring the other country’s weaknesses and America’s strengths.
So?
You’ve defined the headline, good job buddy! ⭐
Actually, “Stone utilizes a comparative analysis method, contrasting the achievements of other nations with U.S. failures. He provides specific examples, such as Cuba’s lung cancer vaccine and Japan’s bullet trains, to illustrate his points. The main finding is that the U.S. prioritizes profit over the welfare of its citizens, resulting in a decline in quality of life and social justice.”
At least, that’s what the ai article review site that I chose says. Not sure which one Keith used.
I’ve got one for you (written from the point of view of the YIMBYs/Vanguard):
“While Woodland was building homes for black and brown people, Davis was building a moat to keep them out”.
MS, much of what you state is true. The United States has real failures. Some are severe, some are indefensible. On transportation re: Japan, I agree outright. That is my area of interest and my profession. Japan has built a system of reliability and long-term commitment that the United States has pathetically not matched. High-speed rail and coordinated planning reflect national priorities that produce results. That critique lands.
The opening device does not. The “while X was doing Y, the United States was doing Z” structure is selective juxtaposition engineered for outrage, and honestly some of the worst comparative metaphors I’ve ever read, humorously bad, like a turkey wrote them by dancing on a keyboard. I mean “While China was planting forests, the United States was criminalizing homelessness.” I mean, what is that? That’s like saying, to steal mixed thoughts, “While In-N-Out was making great burgers, the Vanguard sucked.” Your comparisons stitch together unrelated facts across countries, timeframes, and scale, then you present it as some moral verdict.
You praise China for planting forests and building green energy, both real. China is also the largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, driven by continued massive-scale coal expansion. Both facts define the reality. Leaving one out produces a curated narrative. Your credit Cuba framed around a vaccine breakthrough, while the system around it includes chronic shortages and political repression. You praise New Zealand for pandemic response, while isolated island geography, scale, and later harsh societal tradeoffs shape the real outcome. You repeatedly isolate a virtue and turn it into a moral weapon by leaving stuff out. Massive stuff, important stuff. It’s so obvious, why do you even try?
Your conclusion follows the same pattern. The United States is cast as uniquely broken and deliberately cruel, while other nations are treated as coherent alternatives. Every country listed carries serious contradictions and tradeoffs alongside its successes. The United States argues its failures in public view, which becomes evidence against it. Your essay equates visibility with dysfunction and simplicity with virtue. It reduces complex systems to single data points aligned with a predetermined conclusion. And for you that predetermined conclusion seems to be: “I hate the United States, it is uniquely morally bankrupt, and everywhere else is bettererer.”
Thanks Alan, well said: “And for you that predetermined conclusion seems to be: “I hate the United States, it is uniquely morally bankrupt, and everywhere else is bettererer.”