NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. — At a recent hearing, the accused appeared before Judge Richard E. Pacheco regarding several alcohol- and license-related driving offenses stemming from 2025 cases and one 2026 case. The hearing, however, focused less on the underlying charges and more on the accused’s compliance with court-ordered requirements, particularly proof-of-attendance cards he had failed to submit.
According to court records, the accused faces several misdemeanor-level Vehicle Code violations, including driving on a suspended or revoked license related to a chemical test refusal, underage drinking with a blood alcohol concentration above the legal limit, possession of an open container in a vehicle, and possession of alcohol by a passenger under 21. A separate 2026 case alleges driving while privileges were suspended or revoked because of DUI-related penalties.
During the hearing, the accused appeared with the assistance of a Spanish interpreter. The judge questioned him about missing attendance cards tied to a court-ordered program that the accused had failed to bring to court.
The accused stated the bailiff had not given him the cards at the previous hearing, to which Pacheco responded that it was the accused’s responsibility to ask court staff for the cards if he had not received them. Pacheco further emphasized the seriousness of complying with the requirement, stating, “That is on you, not anyone else. The only difference between walking through the front entrance versus jail is those cards.”
Although the remark came across as stern, the judge ultimately did not impose additional punishment at that time and instead allowed the accused to make up the missing submissions. After once again emphasizing the importance of complying with court-ordered programs, Pacheco instructed the accused to increase the pace of completion by submitting four to five cards per week to finish the required total of 20 within the remaining timeframe, to which the accused agreed.
However, before leaving, the accused shifted the discussion toward recovering his identification card. He told the court that after he crashed his vehicle approximately four to five months earlier, sheriff’s deputies took his license and never returned it. During the exchange, Pacheco asked whether the accused had been cited for driving on a suspended license following the crash. The accused responded that he had only been given a ticket.
Pacheco stated he could not find anything in the court records indicating law enforcement logged or retained the identification card as evidence. He further suggested the accused may need to visit the DMV and apply for a replacement identification card. However, the accused explained that his birth certificate had gotten wet and was now in pieces, rendering it unusable for identification. He stated that recovering his original identification card was crucial.
Pacheco acknowledged the difficulty of the situation but said he did not know where the identification card would be located, especially since the incident occurred in a case from last year. He suggested the accused’s lawyer may need to contact evidence storage or review the cases to determine whether the identification card had ever been booked as evidence following the crash.
The case highlighted how procedural requirements, even seemingly minor paperwork issues, can significantly affect how accused individuals navigate the court system. While the judge repeatedly stressed personal responsibility and compliance with court orders, the exchange also reflected some of the practical difficulties people can encounter when dealing with language barriers, missing documentation and unresolved issues connected to prior cases.
The accused ultimately left the hearing with additional requirements to complete before his next court appearance, as well as lingering uncertainty about where his identification card is located.
Follow the Vanguard on Social Media – X, Instagram and Facebook. Subscribe the Vanguard News letters. To make a tax-deductible donation, please visit davisvanguard.org/donate or give directly through ActBlue. Your support will ensure that the vital work of the Vanguard continues.
