Elections

Group Plans to Launch Own Initiative, Questions Data Underlying Water Project

sig-gathering-water

Measure I Opponents Discuss Criticism of Water Project – Most regular Vanguard readers are familiar with the arguments in favor of the surface water project that is going to be on the March ballot for Davis residents.  However, many are wondering how the opposition to the water project will make their case.

As our opening coverage of the water project election, the Vanguard sat down with three representatives of the No on Measure I campaign – former Councilmember Michael Harrington, WAC Member Mark Siegler, and Pam Nieberg, a longtime community activist.

Sunday Commentary: The Water Process Needs To Be Fixed Now If the Election Is To Succeed

snake-eyesA little over a year ago, on September 6, 2011, the city of Davis thought it had the ability to push through a water project that had not been appropriately vetted – not by community and not by city staff.  The city council thought this could be done without any sort of rate study or review by independent hands.

The citizens of this community rose up and said no, stop, slow down, study the project.  Partly because they had no other choice, and partly to their credit, the council listened, they backed off, and they created an independent body called the WAC (Water Advisory Committee).

Commentary: Closer to a Workable Plan?

Dunning-12-13-12In his Thursday column, his tenth on the subject of water since November 13, Davis Enterprise columnist Bob Dunning argued that “we’re much closer to [a] workable plan.”

He announced that “Dandy Dan” rescued us all.  Writes the venerable columnist: “Just as it appeared his council colleagues might go over Niagara Falls in a barrel and actually institute a water rate plan where people were billed, without warning, based on the water they used last summer, Councilman Dan Wolk turned on his microphone and said it was time to head in a different direction … acknowledging the unfairness of blindsiding Davis citizens with a rate system they never agreed to, Wolk steered the conversation back into familiar waters and won the day.”

Commentary: Bartle Wells Proposal Hurts the Low End User

water-rate-iconEvery time the issue of rate fairness is brought forward, the point is made that the rates are going to up regardless of the structure.  That is absolutely correct.  But it is not the point, either.

We are all going to die one day.  Death is inevitable and unavoidable.  That does not mean that most people are willing to step in front of a bus on their way to work.  It also does not mean that a lot of people do not work hard to eat right and physically exercise in hopes of both prolonging their lives and improving their quality of life during their brief stints on this planet.

Commentary: Council Made the Wrong Political Decision Tuesday night

floating-20

Most Ratepayers Will Pay More Under Bartle-Wells Rate Structure – For a moment, forget about the larger issue of whether or not you support the surface water project.  Last night the Davis City Council, by a 4-0 vote with Brett Lee abstaining, decided to pull the Loge-Williams model off the table and look at one of two possible Bartle-Wells fixed rate models – one with a uniform block rate and one with an inclining block rate.

The decision by the council to override the advice, both of the WAC (on an 8-2 vote) and of city staff and consultants, looks like a political move.  Council overtly worried that the rates would be difficult for the average voter to understand.

Did the City Sell Short on Rate-Sharing Agreement with Woodland?

water-rate-iconOpposition Claims City Pays 30% More Per Gallon Under This Agreement – Right before Thanksgiving, Mayor Pro Tem Dan Wolk and Councilmember Rochelle Swanson made their big announcement that Davis had reached consensus with Woodland on a cost-sharing agreement, under which the cities would equally share all non-consumption-based costs and all consumption-based costs would be shared with Woodland taking up 60% of the costs.

In addition, Woodland agreed to pay for a portion of the pipeline – picking up another $3 million, meaning they paid for half of the pipeline that was within Woodland’s urban limit line.

Sunday Commentary: When the Media Becomes Part of the Campaign

Dunning-12-9-12Davis Enterprise columnist Bob Dunning enjoys a very unique distinction.  He has columns in each of the newspaper’s five print editions a week.  While some may love his work, finding him humorous and entertaining, he also has the potential to be extremely influential in local politics if he takes on a particular issue.

In the past seven years or so, we can find at least three clear examples where Bob Dunning played a critical role in local politics – on the Covell Village campaign, on the Wildhorse Ranch Campaign and on the 2011 Measure A parcel tax.

Responding to Bob Dunning’s Water Arguments

floating-20Editor’s Note: Matt Williams made the decision, rather than simply allow Bob Dunning to have the field to himself at this time, that he would respond to Mr. Dunning’s Sunday column.  In what follows, “POINT ” is from Bob Dunning’s column and “COUNTERPOINT ” is Matt Williams response.

POINT – Every mom and dad living in America in the past 50 years knows about Johnson and Johnson’s “No More Tears” shampoo.

My View: Water Campaign Already in Peril?

water-rate-iconThere are lessons that the fledgling Measure I campaign is going to need to learn ironically from the Mitt Romney campaign.  There are certainly a number of reasons that Mitt Romney ultimately failed in his bid to unseat President Obama, but while many people look to a variety of issues, an early factor was a barrage of campaign ads in the spring and summer by the Obama campaign that the Romney campaign never adequately responded to.

A November 7, 2012 article in the Washington Examiner cited GOP strategist Frank Luntz who said that he “found himself going back to those months in the spring and summer when Obama inundated Romney with negative ads about Romney’s wealth, or Bain Capital, and Romney didn’t really fight back.”

Ballot Arguments on the Water Initiative, Measure I

ballot-mailThe water initiative is now called Measure I.  The Vanguard now has a copy of the impartial analysis, authored by City Attorney Harriet Steiner, and the arguments for and against.  All five councilmembers signed the arguments in favor of Measure I.

The arguments against Measure I were signed by two WAC members – Mark Siegler and Michael Bartolic, former Mayor Sue Greenwald, former Councilmember Michael Harrington, and Pam Nieberg, co-Chair of the 2011 Water Referendum.

Prop 218 Process Remains Problematic

floating-20The city has set up a process whereby the voters would vote on whether to approve the water project prior to the ratepayers completing the Prop 218 process.  In yesterday’s column, Bob Dunning argued that the voters ought to know the costs prior to the election and suggested at multiple points that the council and other decision-making may want to “keep the unwashed masses in the dark,” suggesting “what the city wants here is a blank check” in case of cost overruns.

We found his arguments compelling with regard to the concerns about going forward with the election prior to the rate process competition, but we recognize at the same time this is probably seen more as a timing issue than an attempt by the council to keep the voters in the dark about the costs.

City Has Opened the Door to Criticism on Water Rate and Prop 218 Timing

water-rate-iconIt is increasingly looking like Davis Enterprise columnist Bob Dunning is intent on running part of the No on the Water Project campaign from the second page of the Davis Enterprise.  Under existing rules, he largely has the right to do so.

The Vanguard repeatedly warned the city that they were opening themselves to criticism and potential problems on the issue of ballot timing, and now they will pay some price.  How effective Mr. Dunning’s criticism is remains to be seen.

Election Analysis: Talking with the Wolk Camp About the Campaign, Results and the Future Council

Wolk-contemplates

On Election Night, Dan Wolk did what everyone expected him to do, as the Mayor Pro Tem-elect won by an overwhelming margin, winning every single precinct in the city of Davis.  The other candidates were tightly-bunched, but in the end, two longtime incumbents ended up being defeated.

The Vanguard has interviewed the campaign managers from the three winning campaigns and this is the first of a three-part series on their thoughts, observations about the campaign and how they saw things unfold.

Vanguard Analysis of the Chamber Involvement

Chamber-Debate-060The ChamberPAC might be proud to learn that other than the results themselves, there was no hotter topic of conversation than the involvement of the Chamber of Commerce’s Political Action Committee.  However, unfortunately, it was largely in a negative sense.

If you recall, the involvement of the Chamber of Commerce and its PAC were actually applauded by the Vanguard at the beginning of the campaign.  However, while we support the involvement of the PAC, its actual participation left a lot to be desired.

Colleagues Praise the Legacy of Greenwald and Souza While Looking Toward the Future

Wolk-Dan.jpg

Tuesday was a late night, particularly for the Davis City Council candidates who, because of the closeness of the election and the still unexplained phenomena whereby city of Davis precincts are slow to report, the final outcome was not sealed for anyone other than Mayor Pro Tem-elect Dan Wolk until 1 am.

Despite some surprises, at the top of the ticket, the outcome was clear.  Dan Wolk was the runaway winner, having finished first in every precinct in the city.

Commentary: A Surprise Ending and a New Beginning

Wolk-DanFrerichs-Lucas-665BrettLeeR

It was not supposed to end this way, or at least so we thought.  In the end, perhaps the voters really had had enough.  In June of 2010, the Council majority met for the final time, their legacy an uncertain one at best, punctuated by the failed Covell Village, a booming structural deficit, looming unfunded liabilities and of course the fight between Ruth Asmundson and Sue Greenwald caught on film.

Every member of that council will be gone from public office except for Don Saylor, who serves on the Board of Supervisors in Woodland.

STUNNING DECISION IN DAVIS COUNCIL RACE

Frerichs and Lee In; Souza and Greenwald Out

Brett-Lee-wins-with-team

As expected, Dan Wolk cruised to a first place finish and in July he will become the Mayor Pro Tem and eventually succeed Joe Krovoza as Mayor.  It was not a huge surprise that Lucas Frerichs would finish second – after all, he has spent a decade in service to Davis and ended up raising the most campaign money.

The stunner is that both of the long-term incumbents lost – both Sue Greenwald, a three-term councilmember, and Stephen Souza who would finish fifth in the five-person race after winning both in 2004 and 2008.

Last Minute Ad Blitz Has Chamber Supporting Renters Rights

Chamber-DoorhangerThe Davis ChamberPAC send out notification that it had purchased around 4000 door hangers that would be distributed throughout Davis today at around 9 am.

According to the notification, “These door hangers advocate for a ‘Yes’ vote on Measure D and for support of Davis City Council candidates: Lucas Frerichs, Stephen Souza and Dan Wolk.”