Court Watch

Conservative California Chief Justice Speaks Out Against the Death Penalty

Cantil-SakauyeTani Cantil-Sakauye’s appointment to chief justice by then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger marked a huge moment locally, as she grew up in Sacramento and is a graduate of the UC Davis School of Law.
While known as one of the high court’s more conservative members, she has turned heads as she said, in an interview with the Los Angeles Times, that “the death penalty is no longer working for the state” and she urged a reevaluation of it.

Topete Unlikely To Ever Be Executed As Support For Capital Punishment Wanes and Court Cases Continue To Stall Executions in California

death-penaltyThe Yolo County District Attorney’s office has just spent three and a half years and unknown quantities of money to get the death penalty in what should have been a slam dunk case.

It is still unknown at this point whether the decision by the jury to impose the death sentence on Marco Topete will stand – given doubt expressed by one of the jurors, and her dismissal from the sentencing phase, ostensibly due to language barriers. That explanation is complicated by recent revelations by another of the jurors, who indicated to the Davis Enterprise that there was more to the story than just this.

Forgotten Murder Case: Murderer Faces 45 to Life After Jury Fails to Buy Self-Defense

police_tapeIt was a case that had all of the intrigue – a red-headed boy-next-door looking defendant, turned racist gun-nut, who shot a black man claiming self-defense. But ultimately the jury failed to buy the self-defense theory and convicted Christopher Smith, 31, of second degree murder with enhancements, that put the likely sentence to 45 to life.
If Christopher Smith looked like the boy next door, it is because he was one, with fiery red hair, two young kids, a clean record.  But the recession had not been kind to Mr. Smith, he was in and out of work, struggling through his second marriage, and trying to take night courses at the local community college to build up his résumé.

When Does A Building Become an Inhabited Dwelling For the Purposes of Burglary Considerations?

burglarDeputy District Attorney Sulaiman Tokhi argued that this is a case where “bad liars meet good evidence.”  During these troubled economic times, crimes involving the stealing of metal pipes such as copper and turning them into recycling centers have increased in numbers.

In this case, co-defendants Nicholas Cummings and Penny Burkett would be convicted of first degree burglary and vandalism, with Mr. Cummings also being convicted of possession of burglary tools.

Court in First Amendment Case Overrules Prosecutorial Immunity

Scales-of-Justice

Eight years ago in Colorado, authorities showed up at the home of Tom Mink with a warrant to search for evidence of “criminal libel.”  Mr. Mink had developed a satiric internet publication, The Howling Pig.  Mr. Mink, then a University of Northern Colorado student, was being prosecuted for libel for what he claimed were protected First Amendment satirical writings.

The authorities did not agree, but eventually Mr. Mink was not only vindicated but, after three trips to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, a $425,000 settlement finally ended a marathon legal battle over free speech that began on December 12 eight years ago.

Memory Expert Helps Explain Problems With Eyewitness Identification

Loftus-GeoffreyFive young codefendants were facing nearly 20 years in prison for an attack on January 24, 2011.  The co-defendants, four of whom were minors, faced charges of robbery, assault and gang enhancements.

The District Attorney’s office may have felt this was a slam-dunk case, refusing to make plea bargains that would put the four minors back into the juvenile justice system.  After all, the individual, who claimed he was attacked by five or six individuals on the evening in question in West Sacramento, identified all of them at the scene, and they were caught within a block or two of the crime within an hour of the 911 call.

Examining DA’s Overreach on Gang Charges in Five-Defendant Case

gang-stock-picIn the recent multi-defendant case in which five youngsters were alleged to have jumped, assaulted and robbed an individual, the Yolo County District Attorney aggressively pursued gang charges despite very thin evidence of gang involvement for the youths.

While much has been made about the importance of grant and other financial considerations for the pursuit of gang charges, there is another element as well – leverage. The ability of the district attorney to “direct file” these youths as adults was based entirely on the gang charges.

Defendant Faces 25 to Life for Allegedly Stealing Scrap Metal Out of Dumpster

Protester-Prison-SpendingIn early 2010, the Vanguard reported on the case of Robert Ferguson, who faced life in prison for stealing a package of shredded cheese from the Nugget Market.  Ultimately, after unfavorable press, the District Attorney dropped pursuit of the third strike and Mr. Ferguson for his minor crime, and he was instead was sentenced to nearly eight years in prison.

The Vanguard has now learned that co-defendants Tracy Foster and Pamela Logan face 25 to life charges in a case that involves two counts of receiving stolen property – in this case, scrap metal out of a trash receptacle.

Gang Case Falls Apart For Prosecutor Following Poor Eyewitness Identification Techniques

gang-stock-picOn January 24, 2011, a white male in his twenties, a musician in a band, was walking home from his drummer’s house on Sacramento Avenue (in West Sacramento) at 10:30 pm on a Monday night.  He was wearing headphones when he was approached by a person in a Michael Jordan jersey, who asked where he was from.

When he responded that he lived right there, he was told, “You better get your ass there now.”  As he continued, a group of young individuals came toward him and one of them said, “We’re here to check your pockets.”

Revelations by Topete Juror Put Verdict and Death Sentence in Jeopardy

Topete-DefenseLost in the melee of the pepper spraying incident is an interview of a juror by Davis Enterprise reporter Lauren Keene, whose interview now casts doubt on the dismissal of the other juror, ostensibly for language reasons.

“She said under no circumstances will she go for the death penalty,” the juror, who is apparently a Davis resident but is withholding his name, told the Enterprise four days after the jury came back with a death sentence recommendation.

Davis Man Faces Charges in “Phantom” Drug Case

methYolo County Judge Janet Gaard held Davis resident Paul Delgado to answer, in a preliminary hearing for two felony charges of attempting to sell meth, despite the fact that there is no evidence that he ever possessed the drug that he allegedly offered to sell to an undercover agent of YONET.

Mr. Delgado is being prosecuted by Yolo County Deputy District Attorney Michael Vroman.  The evidence presented, at the preliminary hearing on Wednesday, was based solely on the word of Officer Ryan Bellamy of the Davis Police Department, acting as a supervising agent for YONET.

Commentary: Jury Gives Marco Topete Death in Case in Which We All Lose

Topete-Defense

I’d like to be able to tell you that, in the end, justice was served, a murderer got what he deserved and we are all better off for it.  To wearily quote Bob Dylan, “In the courtroom of honor, the judge pounded his gavel – to show that all’s equal and that the courts are on the level – and that the strings in the books ain’t pulled and persuaded…”

But we all know better than that.  We knew what the result would be in this case on June 18, 2008, the day that the Sheriff’s Deputies locked the public and the press out of the courtroom.

Legal Experts Believe Judge Erred in Dismissing Juror in Death Penalty Case

Topete-Defense

When Judge Richardson dismissed Juror No.11 on Monday morning, granting her request for dismissal based on what she claimed to be a language barrier, it created several red flags for the Vanguard, which questioned why she seemed able to understand sufficient English to render a guilty verdict, but not enough to participate in the deliberation on the penalty phase.

The Vanguard spoke to the ACLU of Northern California’s Death Penalty Policy Director, Natasha Minsker, who agreed that the judge’s ruling puts the entire case in jeopardy.

Judge Dismisses Juror From Penalty Phase of Topete Trial

Topete-Defense

On Monday morning, after a brief inquiry with Juror No.11, the judge granted her request for dismissal based on what she claimed to be a language barrier.  Left unanswered by the judge and unquestioned by the defense is how she could understand enough English to render a guilty verdict, but not enough to participate in the deliberation on the penalty phase.

However, that will be a question an appellate court will have to address, as the defense team went basically silent after the juror’s comments.

Packed House Watches Judicial Watch Program on Wrongful Convictions

Event-Caldwell-2

On November 3, 2011, 285 people packed the Yolo Judicial Watch Fundraiser and Awards Ceremony to listen to a night about wrongful convictions highlighted by Maurice Caldwell, an individual who spent 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit, and Linda Starr from the Innocence Project, one of the attorneys that helped to free him.

The event, which will help to fund the Judicial Watch for the next year, was a tremendous success.  Unfortunately, some sort of snafu prevented our arranged film crew from filming it.  So I have had to piece together this report on the event.

Former Death Row Inmate Will Talk about Prosecutorial Misconduct at King Hall This Week

thompson-johnThis Thursday at King Hall, John Thompson, who spent 14 years on death row before he was exonerated one month before his scheduled execution, based on the prosecution’s withholding of exculpatory evidence during trial, will speak at King Hall and discuss his experiences with the criminal justice system.

Mr. Thompson has been free from prison, but his prosecutors were never punished.  Back in March, the US Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the case that Mr. Thompson had won against them that would have given him $14 million for his years on death row.

Analysis: Systemic Failure Greatly Contributed to Topete’s Killing of Deputy

pelicanbayOne of the most poignant parts of the recent county realignment discussion was when Debra Shelton, who works for CDCR (California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) as an educator, talked about Marco Topete and the fact that we simply failed to provide him with the resources he needed to be able to survive on the outside.

“I met Topete when he came out of Pelican Bay, and he had no resources available to him,” she said.

Commentary: Topete Juror Puts Death Penalty In Jeopardy and Exposes More Flaws in Death Penalty System

Yolo-Count-Court-Room-600

It was not supposed to happen this way.  But a juror’s shocking request to be removed from the penalty phase of the Topete trial has thrown a monkey wrench into the system.

It all started with a note to Judge Richardson, indicating that the female juror was having a great deal of difficulty making the decision.  She also noted that she was raised in a foreign country.

Commentary: Closing Argument Illustrates the Silliness of the Death Penalty in Its Current State

Topete-Defense

As we await the jury’s verdict, I will save you the suspense, this case has been over for a long time, and during District Attorney Jeff Reisig’s brilliant closing, he buried Marco Topete.

That’s right, I called it brilliant and it was.  We can take nothing away from that.  Mr. Reisig cut the perfect tone, both painting Mr. Topete as a monster, repeatedly showing him to be a danger to those inside and outside of prison, and creating sympathy for the victim.  He did his job, he did it well.

DA Reisig Makes Emotional Case For Death Penalty in Topete Case Closing Arguments

Topete-Defense

After three years of waiting, and three months in trial, then a conviction of first degree murder with four special circumstances, the jury in the Topete case now has the unenviable task of determining whether Marco Topete should spend life in prison without parole or get the death penalty.

District Attorney Jeff Reisig made the closing case for the prosecution and tried to take that choice out of the hands of the jury, arguing that Mr. Topete had made these decisions and put himself in this place, and their job was to simply follow the law.