Yolo County

Report Warns of Potential Dangers If Services Are Not Provided to Released Inmates – According to a report from the Stanford Three Strikes Project, the 1000^th inmate has been released under the reform that overwhelming was passed by the voters in the form of Proposition 36 in 2012.

Proposition 36 offers an opportunity for eligible California prison inmates sentenced under California’s prior Three Strikes Law for non-serious, non-violent crimes to seek a sentence reduction from their sentencing courts.

When Eric Holder announced sweeping changes to the federal government’s enforcement of drug laws and its pursuit of mandatory minimums for non-violent, small quantity drug possession offenses, perhaps the biggest change came two weeks later when Mr. Holder informed the states that the government would allow the states to create a regime that would regulate and implement the ballot initiatives that legalized the use of marijuana for adults.

This is a marked contrast to how the Justice Department under Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and the first term of Barack Obama dealt with California’s medical marijuana law, where the federal government was often criticized for raiding facilities, treating terminally ill cancer patients, which dispensed marijuana under state law.

By Catherine McKnight

Deputy District Attorney Deanna Hayes began her opening statement by describing the alleged victim in this case and some of the events that led up to the restraining order she ultimately sought against her husband, Juan Martinez.

Three weeks today, a Yolo County jury acquitted Regina Roxanne Perez of perjury after she had been a prospective juror in the 2011-12 Marco Topete death penalty case.  Ms. Perez and her attorney, Alin Cintean, addressed the Vanguard Court Watch Council last Sunday in front of at least 50 community members at the Davis Public Library.

The case itself is relatively simple.  The prosecution, led by Deputy DA Sulaiman Tokhi, argued that Ms. Perez had lied under oath when she testified that she did not speak to her imprisoned son about that case. She was initially called for jury duty on January 11, 2011, as one of hundreds that potentially could be empaneled as jurors in the death penalty case, which would go on for much of the next year before jurors reached a verdict of guilty and ultimately recommended a sentence of death.

Yolo County Judge Timothy Fall quickly denied a motion filed by Public Defender Ron Johnson that sought to close to the public the preliminary hearing in the trial of 16-year-old Davis resident Daniel Marsh. Mr. Marsh stands accused in the double homicides of Oliver “Chip” Northup and Claudia Maupin of Davis.

“The media coverage has offered speculations about details of the case, including possible defenses, evidence which may later be deemed inadmissible, Mr. Marsh’s history, and his motives,” Mr. Johnson wrote in his motion.  “The media coverage has made a spectacle out of this case, and the potential jurors in Yolo County are unlikely to forget the assumptions and statements publicized by the news media before Mr. Marsh’s trial.”

A Woodland resident, Kristal Sutton, has been held to answer for a single felony hit and run causing death or serious injury charge, after a preliminary hearing on Tuesday in Judge Timothy Fall’s Yolo County courtroom.

According to testimony from three officers, on June 30 around 10 pm in the evening, Ms. Sutton went into the 7-Eleven on East Main in Woodland and purchased a Squirt.  As she went toward her car, she was approached by Alisa Horner.

By David Greenwald and Christina Zuniga

Judge David Rosenberg would hold Troy Hensley, a 37-year-old former JV football coach at Dixon High, to answer on charges that he carried out a lengthy sexual relationship with a then 17-year-old student for four months while she was underage.

Mr. Hensley faces 24 charges related to three types of sexual offenses (sex with a minor, oral copulation with a minor, and sexual penetration with a foreign object with a minor) on eight separate dates, dating from May 31, 2012, until the alleged victim turned 18 on September 10, 2012.  The alleged victim, however, indicated that there were far more than the eight charged dates and that the sexual relationship started far earlier, before they had intercourse for the first time on May 31.

Date: August 25, 2013
Time: 5:15 to 7:15 PM
Location: 315 E. 14th St. , Davis, CA 95616
Yolo County Library Mary L. Stephens Davis Branch in the Blanchard Room

On Sunday, August 25 from 5:15 to 7:15pm in the Blanchard Room of the Stephens Branch Library, 315 E. 14th St. in Davis, the Vanguard Court Watch Council of Yolo County (VCWCYC) is inviting the public to come forward to express their concerns about the judicial system, provide testimony and give personal accounts of contemporary cases in the Yolo County Court system. 

Citizens are encouraged to come to listen to topics of concern raised by invited guests and participate themselves by sharing their experiences with the council and the public.

This week we saw, once again, a man facing felony charges in Yolo County for a miniscule petty theft.  In this case, the man faced a felony charge, accused of stealing a rice bowl from the Nugget Market in Davis.

Under California law, petty theft with a prior is a wobbler – it can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor, with the DA having the discretion of charging it as either.  However, Judge Richardson used his discretion to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor.

By David M. Greenwald

Last week, the mother of Michael Perez, Regina Roxanne Perez, was acquitted of perjury stemming from answers she gave in response to a jury questionnaire for the Marco Topete trial back in 2011.  A week later, Michael Perez, whose 2001 murder conviction was overturned in 2010 and sent back to Yolo County, was in Yolo County court and copped to a reduced plea.

Mr. Perez pled no contest to second degree murder and a reduced enhancement for personal use of a firmarm.  He would receive from Judge Mock an 18-year to life sentence.  With his time in custody since 2001, he will be eligible for parole in the relatively near future.

A Woodland man, Justin Garcia, will face trial on charges of kidnapping, false imprisonment, child endangerment and resisting arrest following Judge Fall’s ruling after a preliminary hearing on Friday, which showed wildly divergent testimony between YONET officers who arrested Mr. Garcia on November 10, 2012, and eyewitness accounts of the supposed victims.

Judge Fall called the kidnapping charges unusual in that they involved fear rather than force, but noted that the statute does not require a particular level of fear that compels the victim to comply.  He said it will be up to a jury to determine whether the facts in this case constitute kidnapping and false imprisonment.

The Vanguard this week will file a motion with the court, intervening to keep the courtroom open for the murder trial of Daniel Marsh.  The Davis Enterprise and Sacramento Bee have already indicated they will be filing motions, as well.

We understand the rationale for the defense’s motion.  His attorney believes that the media coverage, which includes the prominence of the victims in the Davis community and details about his family’s troubles and mental health history, has made it difficult for him to receive a fair trial.

When the jury spent less than one hour deliberating before clearing Regina Roxanne Perez of perjury after she had been a prospective juror in the 2011-12 Marco Topete death penalty case, we were left with the question as to why the District Attorney’s office would spend time and taxpayer money pursuing this case.

Unfortunately, there are more questions than answers here.

The recent defense motion by Deputy Public Defender Ron Johnson that seeks to exclude the public from 16-year-old defendant Daniel Marsh’s preliminary hearing puts us in a quandary.  Mr. Marsh stands accused in the double homicides of Oliver “Chip” Northup and Claudia Maupin of Davis.

On the one hand, the Vanguard has fought for open government and believes that transparency is a fundamental core value in a functioning democracy.  If the government wishes to take away the liberty of a citizen, then it has to do so in a very open and transparent manner where all can see, monitor and scrutinize.