Yolo County

DA Attempts to Blow Domestic Dispute into Burglary Charge; Jury Disagrees

courtroom.jpgA Yolo County Jury has acquitted a young man charged with burglarizing the Davis home of his former girlfriend, in a case that was highly questionable as to whether it should have been criminally charged in the first place. The DA’s office charged him with grand theft and first degree burglary, with an enhancement because the girl’s roommate was in the house at the time of the burglary.  Mr. Estep faced five years in prison if he were convicted.
Daniel Estep thought he was in a long term relationship with his girlfriend Chelsea Stewart. They had met over the winter of 2007 in Oroville when Ms. Stewart was home for the holidays from a UC Davis study abroad program in Sweden.

Convicted Shooter Could Be Facing Life in Prison: Did Prosecutors Get the Right Guy, Though?

courtroom.jpg

Friday afternoon, Woodland, California, a jury returns after deliberating for nearly two days.  They file in quietly, most of them looking down.The last juror as she entered noticed a large contingent of people in the courtroom and muttered some exclamatory statement under her breath. She obviously believed that the people were for this trial. Little did she realize that there were two murder trials that had hearings in the same court room.

That body language should have been a signal, but when the judge announced that the jury was hopelessly deadlocked on what should have been the most difficult charge, it seemed everything was going according to form.  Then the clerk read the jury’s verdict, and when the first charge came back guilty there was stunned silence. The family of the convicted silently wept.

Un tirador condenado podría recibir una cadena perpetua, pero ¿es el hombre correcto?

courtroom.jpgViernes, Woodland, California, un jurado devuelve después de deliberar durante casi dos días. Ellos entran en voz baja, la mayoría de ellos mirando hacia abajo. El ultimo miembro del jurado notó una gran contingente de personas en la sala y murmuró alguna afirmación exclamativa en voz baja. Ella, obviamente, creía que la gente estaba allí por este juicio, pero no se dio cuenta de que hubieron dos procesos de asesinato que habían audiencias en el mismo tribunal.

Ese lenguaje corporal debería haber sido una señal, pero cuando el juez del jurado anunció que el jurado estaba trabado irremediablemente en lo que debería haber sido el cargo más difícil, parecía que todo iba de acuerdo a la forma. Entonces el secretario de la corte leyó el veredicto del jurado, y cuando la primera carga volvió culpables se hizo el silencio atónito. La familia del condenado lloraba en silencio.

Yolo County Man Sentenced to Nine Years in Prison for Two Bad Checks

courtroom.jpgA Yolo County man, down on his luck, was sentenced to nearly nine years in prison for writing two bad checks to Nugget Market in 2007.  He had been facing 30 years to life as part of a three strikes, but that was reduced in final sentencing given the nature of his crimes.

On June 16, 2007 and again three days later, James Davis, a 46-year-old wrote two checks to Nugget Market that were returned for insufficient funds.  Mr. Davis says in his declaration that he was down on his luck and trying to buy food and necessities for his family.

What We Have Learned From the First Week of the Gang Injunction Trial

ganginjunction_catThe Gang Injunction Trial is expected to go for at least two months, one week on, one week off.  Judging by the first week, I would estimate it will be at least four months, possibly longer.  The first week saw only three witnesses come forward, however, I would expect that to increase as time goes on and both sides develop some sort of routine or rhythm.

There are a lot of side issues still to be worked out.  A big issue that needs to be resolved and will be is that of allowing hearsay testimony about unnamed defendants.  I will also discuss in this column, the prosecution’s game plan thus far, and finally a bit commentary regarding a line of questioning on Tuesday pertaining to gang terms and slogans.

Lo que hemos aprendido durante la primera semana del proceso del mandamiento judicial pandillera

ganginjunction_catEl proceso del mandamiento judicial pandillera se espera durar para por lo menos dos meses, una semana en adelante, una semana fuera. A juzgar por la primera semana, yo estimaría que será por lo menos cuatro meses, posiblemente más. La primera semana sólo vió tres testigos, sin embargo, yo anticiparía que este numero aumentará cuando ambas partes desarrollen algún tipo de rutina o el ritmo.

Hay un montón de temas secundarios pendientes de resolver. Un asunto importante que necesita ser resuelto es lo de permitir el testimonio de pruebas indirectas sobre los acusados sin nombre. También voy a discutir en esta columna el plan de la fiscalía hasta este momento y, finalmente, algunos comentarios con respecto a una línea de preguntas el martes que relaciona a los términos de las pandillas y consignas.

Gang Injunction Trial Sees Testimony from Officer and Evidence About Unnamed Defendants

ganginjunction_catOn Thursday, the Gang Injunction Trial resumed and prompted more legal and philosophical questions as we saw West Sacramento Police Officer Michael Duggins testified about unnamed defendants and he named them.  This prompted several long discussions about the relevance of testimony about named individuals who are not listed as defendants on the case, the fairness and propriety of the process.

We will discuss this issue more fully towards the end of this article and likely into the future as it gets really to the heart of the procedural matters and the rights of individuals.

Se abre el proceso del mandamiento judicial sobre pandillas criminales con declaraciones iniciales y el primer testigo

ganginjunction_cat.jpgMartes vio el comienzo del proceso de la orden judicial de pandillas en la que la jueza del Tribunal Superior del Condado de Yolo, Kathleen White, determinará si emite una orden judicial permanente. La cuestión clave es si los Broderick Boys son, de hecho, una pandilla callejera criminal que plantea una molestia en un área geográfica determinada en West Sacramento conocida como la zona de seguridad.

La carga estará en Ryan Couzens y Linden Jay, dos DAs deputados del condado de Yolo, para probar este caso. Muchos abogados diferentes les oponen, y vamos a conocer estos en el transcurso de los próximos meses, que ver a decenas de testigos de ambas partes. 

First Witness in Gang Injunction Trial Provides For Weak Case For Prosecution

ganginjunction_catThe first witness in the Gang Injunction Trial appeared on Tuesday.   Thomas Ignacio Cedillo appeared on the stand following opening statements from the plaintiffs and the defense.  Wednesday became an open date due primarily to logistical issues involved the plaintiffs and the intention to hear on Friday where two key witnesses, named defendants, would be able to plead the fifth due to ongoing legal issues.

The plaintiff’s counsel was overheard at one point saying you always have a choice about starting strong or ending strong, certainly as the record will show, Mr. Cedillo who has been married for the last four years to a woman that he has known for 12 years (he is 28).  He has two children.  He has held stable employment installing insulation first for F. Rogers in West Sacramento and then PCI in Sacramento.

Gang Injunction Trial Opens with Opening Statements and the First Live Witness

ganginjunction_catTuesday saw the beginning of the actual trial phase of the Gang Injunction Trial in which Yolo County Superior Court Judge Kathleen White will determine whether to issue a permanent injunction.  The key issue is whether the Broderick Boys are in fact a criminal street gang that poses a nuisance to a specific geographic area in West Sacramento known as the safety zone. 

The burden will be on Ryan Couzens and Jay Linden, Deputy District Attorneys in Yolo County to prove this case.  They are opposed by many different attorneys that we will get to know over the course the next few months that will see dozens of witnesses on both sides.

Los residentes cuestionan si necesario el mandamiento judicial sobre pandillas criminales mientras que la jueza White se pronuncia sobre las mociones y las reglas para el proceso

ganginjunction_catEsta semana, el proceso del Interdicto Gang se abre en el Tribunal Superior del condado de Yolo frente a la jueza Kathleen White. El lunes, los abogados de la Oficina del Fiscal del Distrito, junto con abogados que representan a los beneficiados del interdicto de pandillas que han elegido a cuestionar la orden se deliberaron y discutieron sobre peticiones preliminarias al juicio que darán forma a los más de cincuenta testigos que ambas partes podrán llamar según  una decisión de la jueza White.

Antes del inicio del procedimiento, vecinos y activistas de los vecinos afectados hablaron con los periodistas. Rebeca Sandoval, quien ha estado a la vanguardia de la oposición al interdicto en West Sacramento, dijo, “La orden se dirige a ciudadanos inocentes y la comunidad se ha visto desgarrado por este mandamiento judicial. La comunidad nunca fue consultada ni informada de los impactos y la forma en lo que el Departamento de la Policía de West Sacramento calificaría los ciudadanos como miembros de pandillas y que todos viven en un área como una molestia pública. “

Residents Question Need for Gang Injunction as Judge White Rules on Motions and Guidelines for Trial

Gang-Injunction-Press-2010-small

This week, the Gang Injunction trial opens in Yolo County Superior Court in front of Judge Kathleen White.  On Monday, lawyers for the District Attorney’s Office along with Attorneys representing those served by the gang injunction who have chosen to challenge it deliberated and argued over pre-trial motions which will shape the more than fifty witnesses that both sides will be allowed to call according to a ruling by Judge White.

Prior to the start of proceedings, neighbors and activists from the affected neighbors spoke to reporters.  Rebecca Sandoval who has been on a forefront of the opposition to the injunction in West Sacramento said, “The injunction is targeting innocent citizens and the community has been torn apart by this injunction.  The community was never consulted nor advised of the impacts and the way the West Sacramento Police Department would label citizens as gang members and that they all live in an area as a public nuisance.”

Vanguard Investigation Finds That West Sacramento May Not Even Be Enforcing the Gang Injunction

ganginjunction_catQuestions About Whether West Sacramento Needs a Gang Injunction as Trial Set to Begin –

In July of 2007, having had the original Gang Injunction struck down by the appellate court, Yolo County District Attorney Jeff Reisig filed an amended complaint seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction to restrain activities of alleged criminal street gang, the Broderick Boys, supposedly a branch of the Norteno gang.

A preliminary injunction was imposed in 2008.  The injunction covers a large swath of West Sacramento and imposes curfews, restrictions on all activities which involve anyone deemed by the police to be gang members.  It limits the ability of those enjoined to go to restaurants, public activities, public transportation, or standing, sitting, walking, driving, gathering or appearing anywhere in public view with anyone alleged to be a gang member.

Reflections on the Shooting of Oscar Grant

oscar_grantI still remember where I was when I watched the verdict back in 1992 in which an all-white jury acquitted Los Angeles Police Officers of beating Rodney King.  I remember where I was, I remember what I said, there’s going to be riots.  Turned out, there already was.  I was just a freshman at Cal Poly that year, but I watched transfixed for days to the burning and looting that occurred in Los Angeles.

One of my favorite musicians/ artists is Ben Harper, a few years after the riots, he wrote a song in which he sings, “Well Martin’s dream has become Rodney’s worst nightmare.  Can’t walk the streets, to them we are fair game, our lives don’t mean a thing.”  Towards the end of the song he sings, “So if you catch yourself thinking it has changed for the best you better second guess cause Martin’s dream has become Rodney’s worst nightmare.”

After Initial Jury Deadlock, Man Receives 31 Year Sentence in Picnic Day 2009 Fight

courtroom.jpgRecently a Woodland man was sentenced to 31 years to life in prison as part of a three strikes case stemming from a Picnic Day 2009 fight that broke another man’s eye socket.  He was sentenced by Yolo County Judge Kathleeen White on June 24, 2010.  On March 12, 2010 a jury convicted Steven Hector Martinez, age 35, of Woodland of one count of Battery with Serious Bodily Injury.

According the District Attorney’s office, on Picnic Day, April 18, 2009, the victim reported he was at the Bistro 33 restaurant in downtown Davis when he saw people he thought he knew getting into a fight in the street area. The victim went over to stop the fight. The defendant, a complete stranger to the victim, “sucker-punched” him in the face with his fist. The defendant and the group with him then fled the scene.

Defense in Gang Injunction Trial Opens With Surprise Motion to Recuse All Yolo County Judges

ganginjunction_catThe West Sacramento Gang Injunction Trial is set to begin next week, but first they had some pre-trial motions to deal with on Wednesday in Judge Kathleen White’s courtroom.  Judge White presided over the preliminary injunction back in 2008 after the Third District Court of Appeals threw out the previous injunction back in 2007. 

Judge White in 2008 imposed the preliminary injunction and now the District Attorney’s office is seeking a permanent injunction.  It is a civil trial and therefore the defendants were not entitled to court appointed representation.  So instead a large number of attorneys are representing the defendants pro bono, except for one defendant who has apparently dismissed his counsel and will represent himself pro per.

Deputy DA Displays Odd Courtroom Behavior

courtroom.jpg

Every so often it pays off just sitting in the courtroom.  In fact, that is part of the premise of Yolo Judicial Watch – the need to get people into the courtroom who can monitor and bear witness to the proceedings.  On Wednesday this paid off as I waited patiently for pre-trial motions to begin in the Gang Injunction Trial, set to begin next Wednesday.

I watched as Deputy District Attorney Clinton Parish became increasingly unhinged in Judge Kathleen White’s courtroom as a series of ruling went again him to the point where he seemed to becoming threatening to both Judge White and the defense counsel he was up against.  Whether he was actually speaking for the DA and illuminating new policy is something that we will have to see.

Rosenberg Fires Back Arguing that Letter From Blacklock Does Not Terminate Benefits

rosenbergThis morning the Woodland Daily Democrat is reporting that Yolo County Judge David Rosenberg is disputing whether a letter from County Administrator Patrick Blacklock to William Vickrey that the county believed would preserve the county’s ability to terminate supplemental judicial benefits by filing just before the 180 period expired, in fact constitutes notice under the pertinent California Government Code section.

The notice was sent out at 4:59 pm Wednesday, just before the deadline to deadline to terminate county-funded benefits for four judges whose terms expire Jan. 1, 2011.

Judge, Supervisors Take Issue with Term “Slush Fund”

rosenbergThis morning the Woodland Daily Democrat had to backtrack off reports that Judges’ benefit would remain in place for another two years.  The  Democrat reported on Thursday that it is a done deal and that the county will have to continue to pay the benefit for the next two years.  “By not acting before today, the Yolo County Board of Supervisors has committed taxpayers to providing $80,324 in additional benefits to Yolo Superior Court judges over the next two years.”

However, the Vanguard learned just before publication that in fact that report was premature.  The Vanguard received a letter from County Administrator Patrick Blacklock to William Vickrey which would preserve the county’s ability to terminate supplemental judicial benefits by filing just before the 180 period expired.

Judge Rosenberg Fights to Preserve Judicial Slush Fund

rosenbergWhy is Yolo County Paying Judges 40K Per Year in Benefits?

A controversy that has been brewing for some time between the County and Yolo County Judges may be exploding as a deadline approaches as to whether the county, strapped for cash, will have to continue to pay judges, ostensibly under state and not county control over 40 thousand dollars per year in benefits that Supervisor Matt Rexroad has likened to a “slushfund.”

This morning, the Woodland Daily Democrat is reporting that it is a done deal and that the county will have to continue to pay the benefit for the next two years.  “By not acting before today, the Yolo County Board of Supervisors has committed taxpayers to providing $80,324 in additional benefits to Yolo Superior Court judges over the next two years.”