Judge Kenneth Wine denied the defense motion to refer the defendant to ACM, instead setting bail at $25,000 and keeping the defendant in custody until their preliminary hearing on August 19, 2025.
The accused was charged with willfully violating a criminal protective order, but the defense argued that their client did not intentionally violate the order, citing that they were in the area to receive services and charge their ankle monitor when the protected party voluntarily approached them.
Being released from incarceration was supposed to be a step toward freedom, but the reality of wearing…
“I spent 30 months on an ankle monitor. It felt crueler than jail.” By Wesley Vaughan When…
By S. Priana Aquino SAN FRANCISCO, CA – Torrance Scales was present in San Francisco County Superior…