Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Kimberly E. Parker denied a victim’s request for peaceful contact with the accused in a domestic violence hearing. The court ruled that the victim must first complete a safety planning class before the matter, which involved considerations of child care arrangements and household finances while a criminal no-contact protective order remained in effect, could be reconsidered.
During a San Francisco Superior Court hearing, defense counsel asserted an unhoused accused woman no longer possessed her passport following a theft. Conversely, the prosecution contended the document remained in her possession, citing recent international travel from the United Kingdom, and the court subsequently scheduled a future date for arraignment on felony charges.
During a progress report hearing in a Los Angeles County courthouse, the complaining witness’s allegations were overlooked by court officials, despite her presenting evidence of the accused violating the imposed Criminal Protective Order.
A Yolo County judge issued a no-contact criminal protective order for an accused person as a condition of bail, raising concerns about the accused’s ability to comply due to their shared business with the protected person.
The accused individual challenged a criminal protective order during an arraignment hearing, arguing there was no probable cause to justify the order as the alleged victim approached him, and the case is more suited for family law rather than domestic violence.
A Yolo County judge denied a request to release an unhoused man with mental health needs to an available treatment bed, ruling that he posed a public safety risk after violating a criminal protective order and serving him with another such order.
A Yolo County judge issued a criminal protective order prohibiting the accused from contacting the alleged victim as a condition of his release, despite the fact that he had already posted bail and been released.
A Yolo County Superior Court judge allowed lawful contact between the accused and his father after testimony showed that contact was welcome and part of the accused’s progress, rejecting the prosecution’s request to maintain a strict no-contact protective order.
Judge Clara Levers granted the defense request for a no-harassment order, allowing the accused to maintain remote contact with his family, but prohibiting him from approaching them physically, and imposed a criminal protective order under SOR.
By Lily Rusk and Bryan Miller WOODLAND, CA – In an arraignment for a felony assault charge…
By Audrey Sawyer MODESTO, CA – While a Tuesday bail review hearing in Stanislaus County Superior Court…
By Avery Redula MODESTO, CA – An accused this Wednesday in Stanislaus County Superior Court had his…
By Ivan Villegas and Holly Werris MODESTO, CA – Judge Carrie Stephens, during an arraignment hearing in…
By Leila Katibah SANTA BARBARA – During an arraignment Tuesday in Santa Barbara County Superior Court Deputy…
By Amy Berberyan MODESTO, CA – After a man accused of domestic violence pleaded guilty to two…
By Taylor Smith WOODLAND, CA – A man accused of domestic violence against his spouse/cohabitant pleaded no…
By Lorelei Olivas MODESTO, CA – Judge Gloria Rhynes ordered a criminal protective order be issued in…
By Alex Jimenez ALAMEDA, CA- This week here at the Oakland Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse, the court…
By Mia Machado FRESNO – A defense attorney’s request to remove the defendant’s children from a criminal…