Cutting Medicaid Could Increase Crime Risk, Warns Dream.org
Medicaid is a crucial tool in crime prevention, and proposed cuts to the program could have devastating consequences, including an increase in crime rates.
Recent Posts
- Gregg V. Georgia at 50: Capital Punishment Reforms Fail to End Racial DisparitiesFifty years after the U.S. Supreme Court's Gregg v. Georgia decision reinstated capital punishment, historical analysis indicates that the procedural safeguards intended to guide sentencing have not eliminated systemic disparities. Data reveals persistent inequities in capital sentencing outcomes, influenced by factors such as race, geographic location, and prosecutorial discretion.
- Meditations: There’s No Adapting to Deadness without Losing One’s AlivenessJournalist Martin LeFevre documented the environmental degradation of a local ecosystem, observing the decline of a sycamore tree and the proliferation of refuse from homeless encampments along an adjacent creek, while also articulating philosophical insights on the role of meditative stillness in confronting environmental and societal challenges.
- Built on Promises, Managed by Contradictions – Price of Being Poor – Part 9Destination Freedom Media Group has called for an independent investigation into Alice Griffith Apartments, a federally subsidized housing community in San Francisco, following reports of significant habitability failures, a reported cluster of approximately ten deaths since January 2026, and a coordinated rent collection campaign initiated on July 14, 2026, through publicly posted 'Balance Due' notices.
- Vanguard Shifts Reader Dialogue to Social Media PlatformsThe Davis Vanguard has implemented a policy change, redirecting reader engagement and discussions from its website to various social media platforms, a move coinciding with its twentieth anniversary of journalistic operations.
- Van Jones, Conservative Attorney Warn ‘Junk Science’ Continues to Drive Wrongful ConvictionsPolitical commentator Van Jones and conservative attorney David Safavian argued in a July 17 USA Today opinion essay that unreliable forensic evidence, frequently termed 'junk science,' contributes to wrongful convictions and erodes public confidence in the U.S. criminal justice system, advocating for states to adopt stricter standards such as Federal Rule of Evidence 702 for admitting expert testimony.