Prosecutorial Misconduct

Everyday Injustice Podcast Episode 335: Iris Eytan on Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Fight for Accountability

In Episode 335 of “Everyday Injustice,” veteran criminal defense attorney Iris Eytan discussed the significant structural failures within the American criminal legal system, specifically addressing the lack of meaningful accountability for prosecutorial misconduct. Eytan, founder of Protect Ethical Prosecutors, advocated for legislative and ballot measure reforms to permit wrongfully accused individuals to pursue civil claims against prosecutors in limited cases, asserting that such measures would deter misconduct and restore public confidence in the justice system.

Racial Bias Alleged in Alameda County Jury Selection as Former Death Row Prisoners Sue DA’s Office

Ernest Dykes and Curtis Ervin have initiated legal proceedings against the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office, alleging systematic exclusion of Black and Jewish jurors from their capital trials in the 1990s. This litigation follows a federal judicial finding of unconstitutional prosecutorial misconduct, which resulted in the reduction of their death sentences.

COURT WATCH: Late Discovery Proceeds during Jury Selection, Despite Sanctions and Orders from Judge

Judge Michael Begert authorized defense attorneys to litigate allegations of persistent late discovery by prosecutors directly before the jury in a San Francisco criminal trial. Public Defender Jared Rudolph had renewed a motion for additional sanctions, asserting that Assistant District Attorney Rachael McDaniels provided further vital evidence on June 18, subsequent to a prior court order imposing sanctions for similar discovery violations. Rudolph contended that the continued noncompliance, involving information from investigations over two years old, indicated a systemic issue within the District Attorney’s Office.

In a First, California Supreme Court Reverses a Death Sentence under New Racial Justice Law

The California Supreme Court reversed the death sentence of Anthony Bankston, a Los Angeles Bloods gang member convicted of a 1991 murder, citing racial bias. The court found a prosecutor’s comparison of Bankston to a “dangerous animal” during the penalty phase violated the 2020 Racial Justice Act. This ruling marks the first time a death sentence has been overturned under the Act, though Bankston’s murder conviction remains.

Judges Dismiss 9 Felony Cases Due to US Attorney’s ‘Flagrant’ Misconduct

The U.S. Senate confirmed Darin Smith as U.S. attorney for Wyoming, a development occurring days after federal judges dismissed nine felony cases. The dismissals stemmed from findings of Smith’s “flagrant” misconduct during grand jury proceedings, prompting concerns regarding prosecutorial conduct and the administration of justice on the Wind River Reservation.

Everyday Injustice Special Edition: DA Candidate Daniel Chung Targets ‘Corruption and Injustice’ in Santa Clara County

A special edition of the Everyday Injustice podcast convened a discussion on wrongful convictions, prosecutorial misconduct, police accountability, and the future of criminal justice reform in California, featuring host David Greenwald, Ben Free Project founder Ben Frandsen, legal advocate Lydia Morgan, and Santa Clara County District Attorney candidate Daniel Chung. The dialogue centered on Chung’s campaign to unseat incumbent Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen and broader systemic failures within the criminal legal system.

Glossip Granted Bond after Supreme Court Reversal Citing Misconduct

An Oklahoma County judge granted bond to death row prisoner Richard Glossip, marking a significant development in his capital punishment case after nearly 29 years of incarceration, nine execution dates, and three last meals. The ruling, which followed a U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning his conviction due to prosecutorial misconduct, allows Glossip release on $500,000 bail pending retrial proceedings.

Former Officer Alleges Retaliatory Pattern Inside Santa Clara DA’s Office

Jermaine Hopkins, an honorably discharged disabled veteran and former police officer, has alleged a pattern of institutional intimidation and retaliation against Deputy District Attorney Daniel Chung, which he believes is part of a larger trend of powerful officials using their power to silence critics and deflect blame.