Late on Tuesday night, Firefighters Union President issued an email to his membership indicated a vote of no confidence, “The firefighters in the City of Davis have no confidence in the ability of Chiefs Black and/or Pierce to carry out the Fire Department’s primary duties to the community.”
“California State Law is very clear about the required qualifications of a City Fire Chief. Government Code section 38611 requires that a “fire department shall be under the charge of a chief who shall have had previous training and experience as a fireman,” the vote of No Confidence stated. “While Chiefs Black and Pierce are both good people – and probably excellent police administrators – neither have had any previous training or experience as firefighters.”
On Monday the city announced, “Chief Landy Black will (remain) the Interim Public Safety Director and will have responsibility for the day-to-day operations of both Fire and Police.”
The city issued a press release late on Wednesday indicating it “was surprised on Tuesday evening to receive information about a “no confidence” vote by the Davis Professional Firefighters Union against the Fire Department’s interim management team.”
In a statement, City Manager noted “it is somewhat unusual to have a “no confidence” vote regarding interim managers.” Mr. Pinkerton told the Vanguard the vote of no confidence would have no impact on city operations or the leadership in the department. He declined to comment further citing the ongoing labor negotiations and impasse.
He explained that these were temporary appointments to allow the City to complete its analysis of how and what level fire services should be provided for the future, an analysis that has included all the public discourse at five recent City Council meetings and will continue as the on-going study of fire operations and structure reaches completion in the coming weeks.
“On or about January 21, 2013, Police Chief Landy Black assumed-overall responsibility for the Fire Department, while Police Assistant Chief Steve Pierce was re-assigned to the Fire Department to oversee “administrative operations”, providing support to the Division Chiefs. The City indicated that these assignments would be temporary and would not impact the fire services provided to the community,” Mr. Weist stated in his email.
Mr. Weist cited four factors including lack of “experience of training in fire department management,” lack of “knowledge of current fire department policies, why they were implemented, and normal past practices of the fire department,” that they have “assigned an unqualified and improperly trained Fire Marshal to supervise emergencies.” They write, “This appointment was made without warning or notice.”
Finally they write, “There has been a lack of communication, as well as major inexplicable changes in staffing, department policy, training, policies, organization and emergency operations.”
“For the reasons specified above, and general discontent with Chiefs who do not possess any experience in fire service, morale within the Fire Department is at an all time low, and line personnel have lost trust in Chiefs Black and Pierce,” Mr. Weist stated.
“Of the 31 full-time permanent employees represented by the Davis Professional Firefighters, Local 3494, all 31 employees voted in support of this action,” the vote of no confidence continues. “They have reviewed the language of this vote of no confidence, and have directed us to send this to you in order to make sure you were aware of our concerns.”
Currently there are 36 full-time employees in the fire department.
In a statement regarding the legal claims of Mr. Weist that the arrangement is in violation of Government Code Section 38611, the statement by the city said, “The City analyzed the legal propriety of having Police Chief Landy Black and Assistant Police Chief Steve Pierce oversee Fire Department management (as Interim Public Safety Director and Interim Fire Chief, respectively) prior to their taking over these roles in January.”
Mr. Weist is correct that under Section 38611 of the Government code, “The legislative body of a city organized under general law shall establish a fire department for the city. The fire department shall be under the charge of a chief who shall have had previous training and experience as a fireman.”
However, Mr. Weist neglects to cite Government Code 38630 which was added in 1998 through SB 1452. That section notes, “In municipalities which provide for police and other emergency services through a consolidated public safety agency which includes traditional law enforcement, fire protection, and other emergency services, the chief, director, or chief executive officer of such an agency shall control the agency.”
In those cases, “The chief, director, or chief executive officer of a consolidated public safety agency is a peace officer…” It continues, “No one who fails to meet all of the above requirements of a chief of police and peace officer shall be appointed to the position of chief, director, or chief executive officer of a consolidated municipal public safety agency.”
In other words, the law allows city to combine their fire and police departments into one public safety department and that a Public Safety Director can oversee the department. Under those conditions, the director must be a police officer.
The city argues that the rationale for the vote of no confidence is “unclear.” The city writes, “Why the no confidence vote was announced this week is also not clear. The Department’s operational and temporary management structure has not changed since January. The only change this week was the City’s announcement that it is hiring former interim Fire Chief Scott Kenley as a project manager for three specific projects.”
Chief Kenley has been asked to perform three specific tasks: “the feasibility of a joint management team responsible for providing executive and operational management and oversight for the delivery of fire and life safety services to the City of Davis and UC Davis,” identify a site for the relocation of the central fire station, and finalize “the City’s Standard-of-Cover document and coordinating with UC Davis Fire the development of a joint Standard-of-Cover document.”
Chief Kenley’s advocacy of boundary drop and reduction of staffing makes him a flashpoint for firefighter discontent.
The city believes that the community remains well served by the arrangement.
Chief Black and Assistant Police Chief Steve Pierce have worked in tandem with the Fire Department’s four Fire Division Chiefs regarding all fire operations issues.
“The Division Chiefs, who have a combined total of 88 years of experience as trained firefighters, have operational authority and control over fire incidents and emergency responses provided by the Davis Fire Department,” the city argues. “They have also been heavily involved with the management team in crafting standard operating guidelines to memorialize best practices in current operations and in response to the City Council’s recently-adopted staffing plan.”
While Chief Black and Assistant Chief Pierce has administrative authority, the Fire Division Chiefs are the ones with operational authority and control over fire incidents and emergency responses.
—David M. Greenwald reporting
We should have a vote.
I have complete confidence in Landy Black’s ability to carry out the Fire Department’s primary duties to the community.
I second Ryan. If the firefighters don’t like it then quit. I’m sure their highly paid cushy jobs won’t be hard to fill.
i think we should have the ability to vote that we have no confidence in bobby weist’s ability to be honest and to do what’s in the best interest of the community as opposed to his personal power and finances.
Would it be okay to institute a requirement that firefighters live in, or within five miles of, the community they serve? Then, start firing these jerks one at a time until we get down to a small core of employees who have at least a tiny caring for the town.
The arrogance of these people is astounding. A no-confidence vote for their interim managers, ridiculous!
It’s obvious the firefighters union is prepared to throw sand in the cogs of any efforts to improve management our city’s public safety operations. The cozy, ask-no-questions oversight of the past management/union, Conroy/Weist coziness has bred a civic monster.
A contrived “vote of no confidence”–based not on actions of interim leadership but on a misreading of state law–exposes a hardball attempt to influence upcoming pay and benefit negotiations and planned reorganization. Shame on these people.
It looks like Bobby is keeping busy (when he is not making votes of no confidence, or setting up fake web sites on the 20 days off he has every month):
California Professional Firefighters 3rd DISTRICT VICE PRESIDENT:
Bobby Weist
Representing the counties of Del Norte, Siskiyou, Modoc, Humboldt, Trinity, Shasta, Lassen, Mendocino, Tehama, Plumas, Lake, Glenn, Butte, Colusa, Sutter, Yuba, Sierra, Yolo, Placer, Sacramento, El Dorado, San Joaquin, Amador, Calaveras, Alpine, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Mono, Merced, Mariposa, Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Benito, Fresno, Kings, Madera, Tulare and Inyo.
http://www.cpf.org/go/cpf/about-cpf/the-cpf-team/
And what will he be spending his time on? From the CPF web site:
“POLITICAL ACTION is a commitment that California Professional Firefighters never backs down from. It’s our dedication and strength in numbers that ensures that CPF is always working hard to elect unwavering Pro-Firefighter candidates and policies.”
Apparently, any tactics are considered fair in this quest. Getting a little nervous, Krovoza and Wolk? Difficult timing for these two.
[quote] institute a requirement that firefighters live in, or [b]within five miles of[/b], the community they serve?[/quote]Ok… two questions:
Should that apply to all City employees, or just firefighters?
Look at a map… why do you have an “or”, because ‘within five miles’ means Davis or El Macero, Binning tract, ‘old’ Willowbank, or the Royal Oaks MHP?
From Bobby’s 3rd District report: “After breaking away from UC Firefighters Local 4437, the UC Davis Firefighters formed Local 4920 to include just UC Davis and joined CPF’s 3rd District with 51 members on November 1, 2012.”
So is Bobby representing UC Davis Fire employees too?
“On or about January 21, 2013, Police Chief Landy Black assumed-overall responsibility for the Fire Department, while Police Assistant Chief Steve Pierce was re-assigned to the Fire Department to oversee “administrative operations”, providing support to the Division Chiefs.
-It’s my understanding ( after speaking to the fire crew on Mace Blvd ) that Chief Pierce is on a leave of absence from the department. I was informed that he is attempting to become a lawyer and is taking the bar exam. The crew also expressed to me that Chief Black has been in the station on 5th street no more than a half dozen times since assuming his dual role. As a reader of this site for some time now, I have witnessed the continuous criticism of the fire union but is the vote of no confidence justified? How do you put members of a police force in charge of the fire department and have them be continuously absent from the start? To a reasonable person that’s not leadership.
One of my main concerns that I would like to express is the growing concern amongst the homeowners in my area about the increasing number of burglaries and crime( I live in South Davis ). Don’t forget about the gruesome murders and Families First debacle too. I want the full and undivided attention of the Police Chief concentrating on ways to improve the police presence in the community. If, in fact, chief Pierce is gone from the force for some time we are already short handed. The Fire department deserves to have a full time chief that is devoted to only fire department issues to get them over this hump and persevere forward.
Now I have read the previous arguments that the city is saving money as they look into a combination of services with the university fire department…………Has anyone noticed that the city just increased its budget by almost 100 million dollars? If I had a cool 100 million laying around I would most definitely hire a full time fire chief. It was expressed to me from the mace crew that council promised to hire a full time chief a number of months ago at a council meeting. What changed the councils mind to delay the hiring again?
hpierce, I just didn’t want to be unreasonable by establishing a city-resident-only requirement. Perhaps we’ll have firefighters who also could become full-time farmers in the surrounding farmland and engage in the Davis Farmers Market.
I’m just looking for people with at least a modicum of loyalty to and concern for the community they serve.
With respect to other city employment, I do think that we should hire the best-qualified people. All else equal, I’d give preference to residents in initial hiring. A similar preference would apply when selecting from existing employees for promotion.
But, history shows that qualifications apparently only need to play a minimal role in determining firefighter promotions. So, why not impose a loyalty and residential requirement?
Davisjogger:
“How do you put members of a police force in charge of the fire department and have them be continuously absent from the start? To a reasonable person that’s not leadership.”
The set up of the fire department right now is that Chief Black and Assistant Chief Pierce are running it administratively and the Division Chiefs are running the operations. If that’s the case, why is it necessary that Chief Black be in the fire station, particularly when it was Pierce that was assuming direct control.
” I want the full and undivided attention of the Police Chief concentrating on ways to improve the police presence in the community”
What do you think the Police Chief should do that is not already being done in this regard?
“The Fire department deserves to have a full time chief that is devoted to only fire department issues to get them over this hump and persevere forward.”
You understand that part of the reason for not hiring the permanent fire chief right now is that the city and UC Davis are working on joint management and therefore it does not make sense to hire a new chief until that is resolved.
“Has anyone noticed that the city just increased its budget by almost 100 million dollars?”
That is not true. The city has roughly the same general fund budget it did last year. The additional money in the all-funds is funded by the water rate hikes and will go to facility upgrades.
” It was expressed to me from the mace crew that council promised to hire a full time chief a number of months ago at a council meeting. What changed the councils mind to delay the hiring again? “
The Council indicated their desire to hire a full time chief a few months ago with the understanding that the work with UC Davis needed to be completed first.
people really need to understand that different pots of money are not mixable. the city’s enterprise fund cannot be use to pay for contracts.