Everyday Injustice podcast
Our podcast will be covering criminal justice reform, mass incarceration, wrongful convictions, and more.
Our podcast will be covering criminal justice reform, mass incarceration, wrongful convictions, and more.
Members of several Davis city commissions are scheduled to convene Wednesday, August 12, for a continued review of the Draft Preferred Land Use Map for the Davis 2050 General Plan Update, a process central to defining the city’s future development and housing strategies.
Davis’s shift from at-large to district elections has demonstrably reduced candidate competition and voter participation. This electoral system change, intended to broaden engagement, has instead prompted concerns regarding its effect on local democratic vitality.
Former Senior Citizens Commission Chair Elaine Roberts Musser commented on the Davis City Council’s decision to disband the commission and restrict the operational scope of other advisory bodies. Musser’s statement highlighted concerns regarding the council’s approach to public input and commission oversight.
Proponents of Measure W contend that the proposed 1,250-unit housing development in Davis provides a substantial allocation of affordable and attainable residences, coupled with developer-financed traffic infrastructure enhancements, prior to the upcoming November ballot initiative.
Commissioner Humberto Benitez, presiding in the Los Angeles County Superior Court’s Airport Courthouse, determined an accused woman’s mental health diversion treatment plan lacked sufficient detail during a pretrial hearing. The Commissioner subsequently denied a defense motion to terminate her SCRAM alcohol monitoring, citing two reported device violations. Deputy Public Defender Rachael Denny had argued the accused was participating in multiple programs and that reported device issues were malfunctions, while Deputy District Attorney Niki Razipour opposed removal, citing the minor’s age and the violations. The proceedings are slated to continue, allowing the assigned prosecutor to review the diversion motion and the defense to provide further treatment plan specifics.
A Yolo County Superior Court judge declined to revoke or increase the $25,000 bail for an individual facing a felony murder charge, despite prosecutorial arguments and pleas from the victims’ family. Judge Paul Richardson affirmed the existing bail amount, even as Deputy District Attorney Aloysisus Patchen cited the accused’s failure to install a Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) device, a stipulated condition of release.
A Newport Beach judge declined to modify a protective order against an accused individual, citing an incomplete weapons relinquishment form from the probation department. The court also continued the matter to a later date after the alleged victim indicated an inability to afford a proposed independent psychiatric evaluation.
A Santa Clara County Superior Court judge declined to credit 40 hours of community service presented by an accused individual, citing the organization’s failure to meet the criteria for a qualifying 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit.
The July edition of the Vanguard Incarcerated Press features stories from incarcerated individuals that expose the cruelty of the prison system and highlight the resilience of those who endure it, while also advocating for free speech, human rights, and prison reform.
I must admit arriving at California Medical Facility Vacaville (CMF) was an answered prayer for me. Since…
Early 2019, nearly a year before anyone had even heard of a Covid pandemic, Dr. Joan Parkin…
Every Christmas, network TV airs the black-and-white classic “It’s a Wonderful Life” with Jimmy Stewart. There is…
We are a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that relies on the kindness of readers like you to help us do everything that we do. Please consider donating today!