“It’s basically called a discharge board or a retention board. Whatever, you call it, I’m going to get fired. I think people have to realize that. They are firing people from their units in a time of war when you need people to serve in their country and these people are able, capable, willing and trained. You’re firing them for the sole basis of who they are. And the sole basis of their honesty.”
“It’s a trial. I am guilty until proven innocent. Guilty until proven capable. The charge against me is my admission, my saying saying three words honestly that has translated to conduct which is translated to immorality which is translated to unprofessionalism which is translated into discharge which is translated again into firing.”
He told the Vanguard that he had basically reached the point where he could no longer lie about who he was.
“Graduated from West Point, we learned that a cadet would not lie. It had nothing to do with your orientation, it does not say that a straight cadet would not lie, but a gay cadet must lie. So that kind of dissonance we don’t deal with.”
Yesterday as expected, the Military Administrative Board recommended the discharge of Lt. Dan Choi under the miltiary’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Policy.”
Here is what his friend Anthony Woods said about the ruling:
“Today, a Military Administrative Board recommended the discharge of my friend, West Point Classmate, and fellow Iraq War Veteran Lt. Dan Choi for refusing to lie to his fellow soldiers, and for refusing to violate the Honor Code to which all Army officers are bound. Lt. Choi is an experienced combat leader and Arab linguist—two things our military desperately needs– who is ready and willing to re-deploy with his unit. Today’s decision only highlights the fact that the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy” is undermining the strength of our military and the security of our nation.
Having served two combat tours in Iraq and brought all 81 of my soldiers home alive before being discharged under the policy last year, I understand what Lt. Choi is going through all too well.
Since 1993, the careers of tens of thousands of soldiers have ended prematurely because of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”—-at a cost of more than $400 million to taxpayers, the safety of combat soldiers deprived of experienced leaders and specialists, and the readiness of a force already stretched thin by two wars and repeated, extended deployments. More than 70% of Americans support its repeal because Americans understand that in a time of war, America’s security is far more important than political expediency.
I applaud Lt. Choi’s resolve to appeal this wrong-headed decision, and look forward to leading the effort to repeal this misguided policy as the next Congressman from California’s 10th District.”
Woods is himself a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. He is a veteran of two combat tours in Iraq, and was awarded both the Bronze Star and Army Commendation Medal for his service. Woods is a native of Fairfield, CA, and is campaigning for the expected Special Election to replace Representative Ellen Tauscher in California’s 10th District. He himself faced this decision not long ago, and also was eventually removed from the military.
I am sure there are some people who believe that this policy makes us better off, but in this day and age that view does not make a whole of sense to me. This is a policy that has outlived its usefully. Truman would integrate the military for blacks and whites. It is time for Obama to take the steps to do the same in 2009 for gays.
—David M. Greenwald reporting
http://www.whitehouse.gov/ContactUs
President Barack Obama
Dear President Obama,
I am writing to request your intervention in the case of Army Lt. Dan Choi. On Tuesday June 30 a Military Administrative Board recommended his discharge under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy regarding sexual orientation.
Lt. Choi has served two combat tours in Iraq and is an Arabic linguist, and is ready and willing to deploy again with his unit. As you know, Arabic linguists are crucial to the success of the counterinsurgency strategy that has turned the tide of the war in Iraq. As you also know, trained linguists are in very short supply.
My daughter is an Arabic linguist in the USMC (1st Radio Battalion) who volunteered for her current, third tour of duty in Anbar Province. She felt her skills were vital and her unit needed her. She can attest to the shortage of these key personnel, and the major role they have played in the success of our military actions in the Sunni Triangle.
Lt. Choi’s unit needs his special skills. These linguists help keep our troops safe and further our military goals. I believe the lack of such translators has become acute enough that it weakens our national security.
I know you have asked Congress to change the DADT tell policy, but while they deliberate we are losing skilled, patriotic men and women. I urge you to consider these on a case by case basis, and in the case of Lt. Choi I respectfully ask that you use your authority as Commander-in-Chief to overturn the administrative board decision and return him to his unit.
Sincerely,
Don Shor
Don Shor – Thank your daughter for her service to our country.
I don’t know how I feel about the DADT policy – it was the brainchild of then President Clinton, whom I was never particularly fond of.
However, I would say that both Wood and Choi knew what the policy was going into the military. So I find their position after the fact a bit disingenuous.
What are the policies of segregating men and women in the military now? Can the same be applied to homosexuals, to remove any concerns the military may have? Does anyone know?
I am not a big fan of women in the military. I think it is fraught with problems, which has turned out to be true. The incidence of rape in the military against women was a national scandal at one time, especially in the military academies.
I think my concern is more for the safety of women/homosexuals in the military, from fellow soldiers, than anything else. So is there some way to ensure their safety as a practical matter? Philosophically I have no problem with women/homosexuals serving in the military.