Governor Brown Goes to War Against Both Sides While Keeping 2012 in Mind with Organized Labor

Jerry-Brown

Last night, Governor Jerry Brown laid down the gauntlet against Republican lawmakers, accusing them of an “unconstitutional delegation of power.”

The governor, angry that the legislature defeated his tax and jobs plans, accused Republicans of being controlled by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

“The Republicans in Sacramento have one jockey,” the Sacramento Bee quoted Governor Brown in a speech in San Francisco, as he changed tactics.

The legislature failed to send the governor his two major jobs proposals.  The first would have closed tax loopholes for multistate corporations and used proceeds to provide tax breaks for California small businesses and manufacturers.

The second would have extended the state’s electrical surcharge to promote energy efficiency and the development of alternative energy sources. The surcharge has been in effect since 1997 and adds $1 to $2 to the average monthly household electric bill.

The Sacramento Bee, in an editorial noted, “It wasn’t even close, as some Democrats joined Republicans in rejecting the measures.”

Writes the Bee this morning, “In the aftermath of that defeat, Brown went hiking.  The quiet approach, Democratic strategist Darry Sragow said, didn’t work.”

“Now he’s trying something else,” Mr. Sragow said. “Plan B, or maybe Plan C, and that’s to engage, to be more confrontational and more visible, to call the question in public.”

The Bee reports that Governor Brown will be asking voters next year to raise taxes.  In so doing, he knows he needs support by the unions, “Brown piled blame Wednesday on the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association  for the Legislature’s defeat of his tax and jobs plan, saying some Republican senators told him they would like to vote for the measure but couldn’t because of the association’s political clout.”

Said  Governor Brown, after acknowledging months of failed negotiations, “At least I know who to talk to.”

However, Republicans are not the governor’s only target.  The governor is planning to veto many of the hundreds of bills passed by the legislature prior to the recess.

“I’m going to veto a lot of bills over the next 30 days,” Brown told reporters. “So I have to say to some, fasten your seat belts. This is going to be a rough ride. … They’ll be playing the veto blues before we finish them up.”

The legislature has sent the governor nearly 900 bills for signature, slightly down from previous years.  Of those, about 560 need to be acted on by October 9.

According to the governor’s office, Governor Brown has signed 295 bills so far this year.  He has also vetoed 31 bills and allowed one to take effect without his signature.

In an editorial by the Sacramento Bee on Tuesday, the paper implores the governor to “use his veto pen without mercy.”

Writes the paper, “Gov. Jerry Brown needs to sharpen his veto pen. We hope he mercilessly skewers many of the bills sent to him in the closing hours of the legislative session.”

“In recent weeks, Brown has declared that not every human problem requires a law. He has noted that the state would survive fine without many of the bills sent to him,” the editorial continues.

The Bee declares, “Lawmakers did, however, jam through an extension of a $100 million annual tax break for the movie industry. Given California’s precarious financial situation, Brown ought to ax this labor- and Hollywood-backed measure.”

The Bee presents an anti-labor message, “Several other labor bills also deserve quick deaths, including Assembly Bill 101, to expand the right of child-care workers to unionize, and Senate Bill 922, to restrict city councils, county supervisors and voters’ power to ban ‘project labor agreements,’ which require that public agencies use union labor for public works projects. This power ought to remain in local hands.”

Indeed, as Bee writer David Siders noted, “The raft of labor-backed bills are a challenge for Jerry Brown.”

On the one hand, the Governor wants to be independent and careful with state spending, but as noted earlier, the Governor needs labor to pass his tax measure.

Writes Mr. Siders, “As the Legislature finished in a flurry early Saturday and left town, it left Gov. Jerry Brown in a jam.  Among the raft of bills approved in the final hours of the legislative session were several union-backed measures that, if Brown vetoes, could strain his already-complicated relationship with labor and, if he signs, could upset his business friends.”

Democratic strategist Garry South noted the delicate balance that Mr. Brown must play as he prepares for his seminal tax measure in 2012.

Mr. South asked, “How much of labor’s agenda can he veto and still have the kind of labor support he’s going to have to have if he puts a tax measure on the ballot in 2012?”

Labor unions spent millions in 2010 electing Governor Brown.  It was an easy call, given the anti-labor rhetoric of his opponent.  It has been seven years since there was a Democratic Governor, and at that time, Governor Davis passed huge increases in both salaries and pension.

Notes Mr. Siders, “Legislation Brown has dispatched so far suggests he is capable of disappointing his supporters.  Despite intense pressure from Democrats and labor unions, Brown vetoed legislation in June that would have made it easier to organize farmworkers. A compromise measure proposed by Brown and negotiated by Steinberg and the United Farm Workers union was approved by the Legislature late Friday.”

Concludes the Bee editorial, “Brown might be tempted to give Democrats who control the Legislature the benefit of the doubt and sign the majority of their bills. But as the governor says, not every human problem warrants a law. The state would be better off without the vast majority of the bills that await his review.”

—David M. Greenwald reporting

Author

  • David Greenwald

    Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

    View all posts

Categories:

Budget/Fiscal

5 comments

  1. [i]”The governor, angry that the legislature defeated his tax and jobs plans, accused Republicans of being controlled by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.”[/i]

    Well if this isn’t the old pot-head calling the kettle black, I don’t know what is.

    Brown is like a puppet on public union-controlled strings. His policy issues appearing to support budget balancing at union expense are always weak and politically strategic in nature.

    Considering the direct payola connection between the unions and Brown, it is laughable that he calls out this indirect connection between the GOP and an organization that advocates for low taxes.

    His two proposals were creative, but punitive to business at a time when business in this state is already on the ropes and ready to throw in the towel.

    The first would have penalized companies doing business outside of the state, but had the secondary impact of penalizing their affiliates within the state. Just the threat of this had the net impact as Amazon.com canceled all contracts with California affiliates. I have not seen any analysis of the job losses caused, but I am sure we are talking hundreds if not thousands of people who used to fullfill Amazon orders within California. The second proposal of electrical surcharges to promote efficiency and would be used for development of alternative energy sources (note, not budget-balancing), again, would have hit energy-using businesses hard.

    Also, we all know how government making direct investing in the green energy industry turns out. Just read about Obama’s $500 million of taxpayer money blown on the now bankrupt Solyndra.

    Brown, like many Democrats, either does not get that business in this state… especially small business, is in crisis. Either this or he does not care. I am starting to think that many Democrats in office do not care.

  2. [quote]Last night, Governor Jerry Brown laid down the gauntlet against Republican lawmakers, accusing them of an “unconstitutional delegation of power.”

    The governor, angry that the legislature defeated his tax and jobs plans, accused Republicans of being controlled by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.[/quote]

    And of course Gov. Brown’s lack of leadership has had nothing to do with the mess we are in – it is always someone else’s fault, and that someone else must be a Republican(s)… sigh… SOS (same old stuff)… the blame game instead of actually working to fix the problems. But then of course if you have no idea how to fix the problems, the only option left is the blame game…

  3. [i]But then of course if you have no idea how to fix the problems, the only option left is the blame game…[/i]

    The governor made specific, detailed proposals for how to resolve the state’s budget issues. The Republicans blocked them.

  4. “the Governor needs labor to pass his tax measure”

    This statement is totally illogical. I see no basis for it anywhere in the article. Just saying something repeatedly does not make for a persuasive argument.

    The truth is the opposite. Labor desperately needs the governor to raise taxes so that they can try to delay the inevitable cuts that are coming their way.

    Is it really plausible that if the governor annoys his labor supporters that they will say
    “No” to higher taxes? Not a chance.

    Every Democrat will always vote for tax increases, so what the governor needs to pass a tax measure is some Republicans.

    The governor may need labor to get reelected, but for passing tax increases they are irrelevant.

  5. [quote]The governor made specific, detailed proposals for how to resolve the state’s budget issues. The Republicans blocked them.[/quote]

    The governor could have worked around it, and put the issue of the tax extensions to the voters, but refused to stick his neck out…

Leave a Comment