ACLU Suit Challenges Government Attempt to Ban Immigrants and Revoke Valid Visas
(From Press Release) – Three students at California universities, along with Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay, filed a lawsuit this week against President Donald J. Trump, the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection for establishing and enforcing an unconstitutional and discriminatory Muslim ban. The plaintiffs are represented by the ACLU of Northern California, the ACLU of Southern California, the ACLU of San Diego, and the ACLU National Immigrants’ Rights Project, along with Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP.
The complaint notes that President Trump’s Executive Order of January 27, 2017, “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States,” constitutes an unlawful attempt to discriminate against Muslims and to establish a preference for one religion over another. It further argues that reference in the Executive Order to Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen is transparently a pretext for the underlying aim to establish this preference. As such, the government’s actions violate the First Amendment, the equal-protection and due process rights granted under the Fifth Amendment, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.
“The federal government has made it clear that it intends to favor Christian immigrants over Muslims in making decisions about who to detain, interrogate, deport, or entirely refuse entry,” said Julia Mass, Senior Staff Attorney with the ACLU of Northern California. “We are a diverse society. American Muslims, immigrants and U.S.-born alike, are part of the fabric of this nation.”
The ACLU’s suit also challenges a January 27, 2017 Department of State letter that summarily and provisionally revoked most valid nonimmigrant and immigrant visas of nationals of the seven predominantly Muslim countries.
Plaintiff Hadil Al-Mowafak is a Stanford University freshman with an F-1 student visa who is now unable to travel to visit her husband in Yemen because of President Trump’s Executive Order. Plaintiff Wasim Ghaleb is a Yemeni student at Grossmont College in San Diego, California. He traveled to Saudi Arabia on January 15 to visit his family, fully intending to fly back to California two weeks later for the Spring semester. Though he possesses an F-1 student visa, he is now barred from returning. Plaintiff John Doe is from Iran and is currently a Ph.D candidate at University of California, Berkeley. He possesses a valid F-1 student visa and recently received and accepted a job offer at a top Fortune 50 Company in Silicon Valley, which is now in jeopardy because of the Executive Order.
Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay (JFCS East Bay) is an organizational plaintiff in the suit. JFCS East Bay has a long history of working to resettle and provide legal and other services to refugees and immigrants from many countries. “All throughout history, people have summoned their courage and moved to create a better life for themselves and their family,” said Executive Director Avi Rose. “This executive order is dishonoring our history, it’s dishonoring our values, and it’s bringing chaos and despair to the lives of everyday people.”
The suit seeks to establish plaintiffs as a class, representing all people who are nationals of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria or Yemen and who currently are, or recently have been, lawfully present in California and who would be able to travel to the United States or leave and return to the United States if it were not for the Executive Order. Plaintiffs also seek a declaration that the Executive Order is illegal and may not be enforced.
The suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
It’s not a Muslim ban, it’s a seven country temporary ban until the vetting process can be thoroughly examined. But it’s all actually it’s on hold right now do to judge’s ruling yesterday.
Directed at Muslims.
“But it’s all actually it’s on hold right now do to judge’s ruling yesterday.”
Due to lawsuits like this.
It’s the same seven countries that Obama selected in the 2015 Terrorist Travel Prevention Act. If it was a Muslim ban countries like Indonesia, Turkey, Pakistan and many others would’ve been included.
Except he said, it would be a “priority” to allow middle eastern Christians to enter the U.S., including those who hail from countries banned for travelers by the executive order.
Once refugee admissions resume, the government will “prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality.”
Trump said: “They’ve been horribly treated. Do you know if you were a Christian in Syria it was impossible, at least very tough to get into the United States? If you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible and the reason that was so unfair, everybody was persecuted in all fairness, but they were chopping off the heads of everybody but more so the Christians. And I thought it was very, very unfair.”
Yes, I think we’ve all heard what the administration has said. Did you miss Trump’s entire campaign? Did you miss Giulani recently explaining that this was indeed a Muslim ban being rephrased as an executive order to protect America, and rejiggered to appear legitimate and legal?