What began as a public comment that I delivered before the Davis City Council grew into a bit of discussion about possibilities. The city is poised to place an of extension half-cent sales tax measure on the ballot in June. That measure would continue the generation of three million in tax revenue to the city. However, people like me have come out against the sales tax in part because it was used to help expand city employee compensation over the last five years rather than expand services.
Moreover, as I argued last night, while the city of Davis faces a long-term fiscal crisis that has serious ramifications, the short term forecast is not bad. As City Manager Bill Emlen pointed out, even the bad news from last night, falling short of revenue projections measures in the hundreds of thousands rather than the millions.
Councilmember Heystek’s Budget Projections Prove More Accurate Than Navazio’s –
The failure of Davis to adequately address its short-term budget crisis, combined with a further downturn in sales tax revenues has lead the city of Davis to run a new deficit of nearly a million dollars.
The city is in the short-term proposing to balance the budget by using the reserve and then develop new recommendations aimed at restoring the 15% General Fund reserve.
The Davis Enterprise argued in an Editorial yesterday that the city’s labor negotiations should be conducted in public. They used the conflict that emerged last month on the council dais, that started over a dispute between two members of the council as to what happened behind closed doors as an impetus to once again argue for public negotiations.
It is an interesting idea that was broached by the Enterprise last spring before the commencement of bargaining. However, the city cited confidentiality laws among other reasons for not conducting negotiations in public. I would argue that while they may be correct, there could have been a lot greater transparency during the process.
So far there are only two candidates for the Davis City Council, however, that is likely to change as the filing deadline approaches. In the meantime, the two announced candidates have raised roughly similar amounts of money.
Sydney Vergis who finished fourth back in 2008 has received 6733 dollars while Joe Krovoza has received 7675. How they got there was very different.
The Vanguard learned earlier this week that developers for Covell Village have yet to turn in an application for the development. That is still believed to be forthcoming, but the original word was that they would submit their application in January. That has not occurred.
In the meantime however, supporters of the project and members of the Astroturf Organization CHA (Choice for Healthy Aging) are turning up the heat with an apparent letter writing campaign following the February 2 editorial by Robert Chason, another member of CHA in the Davis Enterprise. Attempts to contact Robert Chason following our commentary last week have not succeeded.
The Vanguard has learned that the telecommunication company, NewPath has filed a lawsuit against the city of Davis stemming from the rescission of encroachment permits by City Manager Bill Emlen in December the subsequent denial of appeal by the City Council in Janaury.
On January 19, 2010, the Davis City Council unanimously voted to deny an appeal by NewPath on the rescission of encroachment permits by the City Manager Bill Emlen. Bill Emlen made the decision on December 5, 2009 to rescind NewPath’s encroachment permits and related building permits for a proposed cell tower distribution system across the city.
The Vanguard in investigating how it was that encroachment permits were issued by the public works department has obtained copies of all of the encroachment permits that were issued to the company NewPath between October 21, 2009 and November 16, 2009. Counter to claims made by the company at the time, the city directly ordered the company to work with the owners of a given property as a condition of building the facility.
This condition was not adhered to and on that basis the city might have had the authority to pull the encroachment permits. This is important because there is a reasonable possibility that NewPath will sue the city of Davis as they have other communities.
When last we saw it in early December, the Davis City Council unanimously voted to direct the City Staff to fulfill its agreement with the neighbors of the Montessori Day Care Center and determine if problems still exist with noise levels two years after the construction of the sound wall and three years after all parties (daycare center, neighbors and the City) had agreed to implement a list of mitigation measures to reduce noise.
The agreement between all parties on August 24, 2007 was that after the soundwall was constructed, there were be a re-evaluation of the noise levels to determine if other measures needed to be taken.
I read the op-ed in the Enterprise written by Robert Chason a few days ago entitled “Political Ills Found Locally, Too” and I came away completely perplexed by its purpose. Was he trying to criticize local government? Was he resigning as a paid consultant to the Covell Village developers John Whitcombe and Bill Streng? Was he decrying the problems of local governance?
Covell Village is expected to return to the Davis radar as the developers are revamping a proposal for an 800-unit, Sun City-style, retirement community on the property whose last project was handily defeated by the Davis voters back in 2005.
On Tuesday night it became clear that despite the vote to continue to pursue options, that the idea of annexing West Village is on life support. The problem is logistical and financial.
The bottom line is that from the standpoint of either the city or the university, there may be a good reason for annexation to occur as studies have shown that the project loses the least amount of money under an annexation plan.
All eyes of the city were undoubtedly on last night’s city council meeting. The meeting itself went off relatively smoothly, although one councilmember privately suggested that everyone was walking on eggshells.
Several members of the public came to speak during public comment expressing condemnation for last week’s conduct by some and imploring the council to move on with basic decency in the future.
Last night, at the City Council meeting, the proposed Carlton Plaza Davis assisted living facility was approved on a 5-0 vote in favor. Proponents were tickled pink, and I started a round of applause upon hearing the decision. It was a happy outcome for seniors in Davis, and good for all citizens. Why? Here are the positives of this project, as stated in a staff report:
1. “the few existing facilities …[that] offer… similar services… [have] waiting lists”; 2. “there are limited undeveloped parcels of the size desired” but they are not suitable
The Vanguard along with Councilmember Sue Greenwald and Lamar Heystek have criticized the contract agreements that have come forth out of the collective bargaining process in part because they have failed to take on the most serious of the structural problems. Much time has focused on city pensions that exploded in the last decade as the city expanded their PERS coverage for public safety employees giving them 3% at 50 and giving other employees 2.5% at 55.
As Councilmember Heystek said following the approval of the firefighter contract in December,
As construction has already begun on West Village, the issue of annexation becomes more urgent. There are philosophical reasons to support the notion of annexation. Namely, you would have a large number of residents living on the city’s edge who are effectively disenfranchised from municipal decisions. The first part of the project calls for about 1000 students houses and another nearly five hundred homes. This would be workable but far from ideal.
There are also fiscal considerations that make such an annexation very difficult. The county, the university, and the city all have fiscal stakes in the outcome no matter what is decided. This report will briefly highlight the city staff report and also discuss the consequences that could occur in the future.
After listening to concerns with respect to the proposed Carlton Plaza Davis assisted living facility, and city staff’s recommendation against approval,
The Davis Senior Citizens Commission passed the following resolutions:
Earlier this week, the entire region, in fact, a good chunk of the state got to see the less than stellar side of Councilmember Sue Greenwald as she accused her colleague of being a liar, and continued to carry on off-stage when the Mayor was down for the count.
The Sacramento Bee called this the rude side of small town democracy. They wrote this morning that Davis, in comparison to the civil discussion in Winters over a fast-food restaurant:
The Vanguard has learned and confirmed that the City’s HR Director Melissa Chaney sat at the management table as part of the negotiating team on behalf of the city during the discussion and negotiations with the city management employees group. Not only is Ms. Chaney a member of that bargaining group, but so too is her husband, Rick Guidara who is an information services manager.
The city was clearly aware of this potential conflict of interests. The Vanguard understands that City Finance Director Paul Navazio recused himself from being the city bargaining team when the department heads discussion came up due to the fact that he deemed it to be a potential conflict of interest.
Lost in the chaos of Tuesday is the fact that an important discussion took place and will need to be revisited since the council adjourned without taking action. I think it is important to note at the outset here, that I was surprised the discussion took the turn it did because in my view, the line drawn in the sand should have been with the management group and fire not PASEA.
From the standpoint of fairness, I certainly could not support a system where fire and management got a better deal than the 125 or so employees that make up the PASEA bargaining group.
I have seen a lot of things in the last four years, probably more than most in this community. I have seen the best in people and at times the worst in people. However, I am not sure I have ever seen a worse side of people than I did on Tuesday night. The worst of it came after the cameras were off.
I delayed writing about this for a day. I wanted to gain some reflection. I wanted to see how things played out. I spoke to other reporters about the propriety of reporting such a personal encounter and asked what they would do. But mostly I watched the response of the community and whether Councilmember Sue Greenwald would step up and take responsibility for her actions on Tuesday.
What began as a typical debate over the latest round of MOUs quickly devolved into first more bickering between Councilmember Sue Greenwald and Mayor Ruth Asmundson. The Mayor twice stepped aside to allow Mayor Pro Tem Don Saylor preside over the meeting.
The second time the Mayor retreated into the vestibule where she began getting medical attention from an off-duty firefighter. She would later be taken to the hospital. The Vanguard understands that her blood pressure rose greatly but has no further details on her condition at this time.