Students

At first I thought it was a typo, students supposedly protesting the impending tuition hikes by going nude in the quad at UC Davis, that should have read Berkeley right?  The students claimed that their lack of attire was symbolic of the fact that they are being “stripped” of their right to accessible, affordable, quality education.

As it turns out, it must have been Davis after all, because naked to these students meant walking around in their underwear.  Kids today.  Kind of reminds me of a hunger strike at the UC Berkeley campus a decade ago, it turns out the kids weren’t exactly starving themselves as they consumed the SlimFast diet drink.  Didn’t stop the administration from caving to their demands.

September 24 has become the magical date at UC Davis.  That is the date of the first day of instruction for the fall quarter.  Planned for that day is a faculty walk out that at least 100 UC Davis faculty members have signed onto.  At issue there is that they want some of the furlough days to fall on instructional days.

At the same time, last week, UC Davis told its more than 4400 union employees that if they do not accept the furlough they will face layoffs or other reductions.

Matt Krupnick from Contra Costa Times reported last Thursday that the University of California may raise student fees an additional 32 percent by the fall of 2010.  This would boost the annual undergraduate tuition to over the 10,000 dollar mark for the first time in the system’s history.

He reports that UC regents will meet next week to discuss the phased increases which would include a more modest 7.5 percent hike for Spring 2010 followed by a much sharper increase in the fall.

At 9 a.m. Thursday morning, UCDavis’ building contractor for the West Village project began entombing ground squirrels. Using a tractor-drawn plow, workers began the long grading process that will lead to yet another subdivision of single family homes, apartments, and commercial development. Standing in the way was one of the largest ground squirrel colonies UC Davis has ever had. Stretching over an area about the size of a football field, almost 100 burrow openings provided doorways to the underground homes for the over 100 squirrels who lived there. Driving or biking by Friday afternoon you would be able to see frantic adult and juvenile squirrels trying to find those doorways, possibly to reach those who remained underground out of fear, maybe to get away from the vehicles roaring by.

It was a simple bill, along the lines of Proposition 1F, except this one for the University of California–it limited UC executive pay increases during times when there were budget cuts and student fee increases.  SB 217 would have prohibited pay raises for top executives in years in which the UC or CSU budget does not receive an increase in state funding.  

The University of California Board of Regents this summer approved exorbitant pay raises for more than two dozen executives.  The hikes, which included a 25 percent increase for UC San Francisco’s chief financial officer and pay in excess $500,000 for UCSF’s chief operating officer, came at the same time that Regents approved pay cuts, layoffs, and furloughs for lower wage workers.

On Friday, Interim Provost and Executive Vice President of Academic Affairs Lawrence Pitts sent out a letter announcing that the proposed faculty furloughs will not occur on instructional days–those “days for which a faculty member is scheduled to give lectures, lead classes or workshops, have scheduled office hours, or have other scheduled face-to-face responsibilities for students.”

In some ways, this might seem to a no-brainer as it mitigates the impact of what should be the university’s primary duty–the education of students.  However, not surprisingly this has trigger criticism from faculty leaders and representation.

There has been much talk about the West Village development providing key faculty and staff housing to employees at UC Davis who are currently unable to live in the city of Davis.  Many argue that UC Davis brings in 1500 housing units, including 475 homes with this project.  But much of that is in the form of student housing, rather than housing for employees of UC Davis.  In the first phase, the number will be just 325 units.

Realtors around Davis have expressed concern about the overall viability of the project describing it as small housing with limited equity that is unlikely to attract existing homeowners.  They pose the question as to whether the project will fail before it even gets underway.

In what an elaborate ceremony attended by many of the leaders on and off the UC Davis Campus, outgoing UC Davis Chancellor Larry Vanderhoef celebrated the culmination of a long process and the beginning of the construction phase of West Village.

Everyone joked as to how long the process took, but the planning began back in the 1990s as a means to provide affordable housing for faculty and staff while supplying additional housing for some 3000 UC Davis students.

There has been a lot of talk about incoming UC Chancellor Linda Katehi and what seems to get overlooked due to the scandal surrounding her alleged admissions policy shenanigans are the huge pay increases and perks Linda Katehi will be receiving from the UC Regents while student fees climb another 9.3% this year.

Excessive executive compensation has been in the news a lot lately from AIG to the Auto Industry, but when it happens in a public institution like the University California it gets nowhere near the public outcry.

On Thursday the report was released by the commission investigating the University of Illinois.  It was a scathing report and the impact from it will be felt far and wide.  Officials will be urged to resign and there were harsh words for the top administrators the President and Chancellor for acting unethically and enabling an admissions process that would allow students with subpar scores but influential and powerful sponsors to become students at the system’s flagship school.

However, as bad as the report is, that is not our concern in Davis.  Our concern is with the status and implications of incoming Chancellor Linda Katehi.  And from our perspective it appears that Chancellor Katehi comes out unscathed.  The report directly names nine people who either knew or should have known of the admission of substandard clouted applicants at the time of those decisions, Katehi is not only not mentioned on that list but her name does not appear at all in the report.

While 20 members of the UC Board of Regents cast their vote to go along with President Yudof’s furlough plan, one Regent was still looking for a different way.  That was Lt. Governor John Garamendi who has foregone a challenge for Governor in favor of seeking the open 3rd Congressional Seat, vacated by Ellen Tauscher who was appointed by President Obama as an under Secretary of State for arms control.

Right up until the end, Mr. Garamendi was looking for another way.  He called on the Regents instead of acceding to the demands of the economic downturn to join a coordinated effort with CSU and the Community Colleges to Abolish the two-thirds majority requirement and pass an oil severance tax.

In the 1950s California led the way with an innovative and unprecedented higher education  that would enable anyone who wished to, to attend a four year college and get a college degree.  For the next half century, California had a higher education system second to none in the world.  There was the world-class University of California system that would take the top tier of student and the California State University system that would admit virtually anyone, initially at no cost and but even to this day one of the best deals around.

If this is the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression one of the biggest victims will be the California Dream of an accessible and affordable college education.

Today the UC Board of Regents will vote on a controversial plan that will enact furloughs to help close the growing budget of the University of California.  UC President Mark Yudof announced this proposal last week, and the plan still has to go through full board approval and union approval.  While this plan seeks to save money by avoiding cutting jobs, and instead opting for between 11 to 26 unpaid days off proving a small salary cut, UC employees, professors, and AFSCME Local 3299 are openly stating their opposition.

The Vanguard had the opportunity to do a brief phone interview with AFSCME Local 3229 President Lakesha Harrison.  The Vanguard asked Ms. Harrison two questions revolving around this ordeal: Is this fair? And who does this effect the most?

On Friday a very prestigious group of UC Davis professors came to the defense of incoming Chancellor Linda Katehi.  Unfortunately, like many who have come to her defense, they have failed to address the key issues that have brought questions.

The bottom line I think for myself is that at first the chancellor did not answer questions about what happened during her tenure at the University of Illinois.  When she did, her answers seemed in contradiction to the facts that emerged.  In short, she has not been forthcoming with information that explains her exact role.  While I agree that nothing has come forward is a smoking gun in terms of her involvement, at the same time the answers and statements that she has given have failed to put this issue to rest.

I wanted to wait until UC Davis sent me Chancellor Katehi’s response before I opined in this matter.  Perhaps she would have the one explanation that made sense of this entire thing. But her response is more of the same: denial or responsibility even as the evidence begins to mount that castes doubt on her claims.

Here is her full statement, you can decide yourself based on the evidence if it is believable:

This morning’s Chicago Tribune has now for the first time directly linked incoming UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi to the growing University of Illinois influence peddling scandal.

The revelations link a politically connected Greek Orthodox priest trying to get help for the daughter of a family friend so that she could attending the University of Illinois.  In the course of doing so he reached out to a campaign adviser to State Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias.  A few months later, that priest aided Giannoulias with a large fundraiser that needed him at least $120,000, according to the Tribune article.

It would require the willing suspension of disbelief to buy the account offered by newly appointed University of California (UC) Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi that she was unaware of the admissions scandal that is now engulfing her current employer, the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champagne (UIUC).

For weeks now, the Chicago Tribune has detailed the well established and entrenched practice of circumventing the normal admissions process for the sons and daughters of the wealthy and powerful.

“I want to be clear to you and others at UC Davis that I was not involved in the admissions decisions that were the subject of the Tribune’s “Clout Goes to College” investigation.”

In a week that featured a major press conference led by Senator Leland Yee and featuring Democrats and Republicans from both houses in the legislature introducing a constitutional amendment that would open up the University of California to oversight from the state legislature, now we have two letters, one from President Mark Yudof and the other from Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor Enrique Lavernia.  The letters warn of the possibility of furloughs, pay cuts, and a loss of 20 percent of the state general fund support for the UC Davis campus.

Vice Chacellor Lavernia writes:

Yesterday a bipartisan group of State legislators introduced a Constitutional Amendment to allow greater public oversight and accountability of the University of California in response to a number of egregious actions by the UC Board of Regents, including recent exorbitant executive pay hikes.

SCA 21, authored by Senators Leland Yee (D-San Francisco), Roy Ashburn (R-Bakersfield) and Gloria Romero (D-Los Angeles) and ACA 24, authored by Assemblymembers Brian Nestande (R-Palm Desert) and Anthony Portantino (D-La Cañada Flintridge), would remove the Regents autonomy and allow the Legislature to enact statutes affecting UC policy, similar to authority granted over the California State University.  If approved by two-thirds of the Legislature, the measure would be put before the voters for final approval.