June 2011 marks the 40th anniversary of President Richard Nixon’s declaration of a “war on drugs” – a war that has cost roughly a trillion dollars, has produced little to no effect on the supply of or demand for drugs in the United States, and has contributed to making America the world’s largest incarcerator. Throughout the month, check back daily for posts about the drug war, its victims and what needs to be done to restore fairness and create effective policy.
The “war on drugs” has had a devastating impact on women and families, who have been greatly affected by policies like mandatory minimum sentences, prosecution of low-level drug offenses, increased conviction and imprisonment of those with relationships to drug dealers, and criminalization of women with drug addiction and mental health problems and histories of sexual abuse.
June 2011 marks the 40th anniversary of President Richard Nixon’s declaration of a “war on drugs” – a war that has cost roughly a trillion dollars, has produced little to no effect on the supply of or demand for drugs in the United States, and has contributed to making America the world’s largest incarcerator. Throughout the month, check back daily for posts about the drug war, its victims and what needs to be done to restore fairness and create effective policy.
Having battled sinus cancer and an inoperable brain tumor for more than a decade, cancer patient Joseph Casias is used to fighting for his life. But now the War on Drugs has forced him to fight for his livelihood, too.
June 2011 marks the 40th anniversary of President Richard Nixon’s declaration of a “war on drugs” – a war that has cost roughly a trillion dollars, has produced little to no effect on the supply of or demand for drugs in the United States, and has contributed to making America the world’s largest incarcerator. Throughout the month, check back daily for posts about the drug war, its victims and what needs to be done to restore fairness and create effective policy.
Having battled sinus cancer and an inoperable brain tumor for more than a decade, cancer patient Joseph Casias is used to fighting for his life. But now the War on Drugs has forced him to fight for his livelihood, too.
Our biggest concern, up until last week, was that not enough people in this community knew that water rates would be tripling. That is no longer the case and I will extend appreciation to the Davis Enterprise for their coverage of the issue, particularly Crystal Lee’s story on the Prop 218 process and Jonathan Edwards’ coverage of the water rates.
However, we remain concerned about the implications of these water rate increases. I have been called irresponsible here for my stance on water. I will not shy away from it, however. The problem that I see is that water is not the only crisis we face and when put against issues such as the city budget and education, as well as county social services, I would not rank the water issue among the highest.
AB 40 ensures law enforcement will know about crime in long-term care facilities
By Assemblymember Mariko Yamada –
The California State Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes recently exposed “deep flaws in California’s system for detecting and responding to elder abuse and neglect” in long-term care facilities in their report California’s Elder Abuse Investigators: Ombudsmen Shackled by Conflicting Laws and Duties. The report’s findings are verified by hearings I conducted as Chair of the Assembly Aging and Long-term Care Committee last August and in a joint hearing with the Assembly Committee on Public Safety in February. During these hearings, district attorneys, law enforcement, and the Attorney General’s Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud testified that the state has made a “de facto” choice to obscure the extent of criminal abuse and neglect in long-term care facilities by statutorily handcuffing dedicated, unpaid volunteers of the Office of the Long-term Care Ombudsman.
The “Long-term Care Ombudsman,” a federal program in every state, facilitates details of daily living for disabled or incapacitated residents of long-term care homes. Ombudsmen fulfill their duties under the protection of strict federal confidentiality guidelines established to protect the residents from potential retaliation from management.
Last week we noted the fact that the leadership in City Hall, the Department heads and Management, were by and large receiving as much if not more in salary than they were back in 2007. We argued that the city could save between 300 and 500 thousand dollars annually through a flat reduction in salary for those making over 87 thousand a year, who were either department heads or from the management group.
We noted personnel cuts, to date, have largely been achieved through the elimination of positions due to retirement or transfer. However, replacement employees often receive the same salary if not more than their predecessors.
The trial of Tim Kinser began this week in Department 8 in front of Judge Janet Gaard. Mr. Kinser was accused of inflicting corporal injury upon his wife of the time, and endangering the health of their two young daughters. The incident occurred on July 31, 2010, at their Woodland residence.
Prior to the trial, Mr. Kinser had informed the Vanguard that his wife was a heavy drinker and had attacked him. He claimed he was bringing this to trial in an effort to retain visitation rights with his children and keep them away from their drunken mother.
A published report in yesterday’s Sacramento Bee suggested that the state has no idea how it will reduce 144 thousand inmates down to 133 thousand within five months.
Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, said Tuesday “We are out of time and we’re out of room. We’ve got to get this done.”
The city council moved forward with their plans for a Prop 218 notice, despite the clear insufficiency of the process. The problem this community faces is captured perfectly by Bob Dunning’s most recent column.
Mr. Dunning quotes a reader stating: “Between the steep rise in water rates and the school bond measure that just passed, I feel severely beaten up here in Davisville.”
We like many aspects of this council better than the previous ones we covered, but one area that has not improved is time management and, in particular, the planning of meetings. Last night is merely the latest incarnation of the ongoing madness when, in all great irony, the council spent 20 minutes trying to figure out how it would save time.
Three things conspired to cause the root of this problem. First, the council had a joint meeting that went until 6:30. Following the joint meeting they had an extended closed session that ended around 7 pm. So they were already starting late when they discussed how to alleviate a content-heavy agenda.
Council Moves Forward With At-Grade Crossing Application –
The Davis City Council moved forward with its at-grade crossing application for the California Public Utilities Commission, after council approved the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND).
Additional information provided by the city demonstrates that this is a long and uphill process, as the California Public Utilities Commission questions the safety improvement of the at-grade crossing and seems to recommend grade-separated crossing as the solution.
University Claims This To Be An Old Database From 2003 That They Never Used –
Following the controversy over the university’s Student Activist Team back in April and the admission and apology by the university for a plainclothed UC Davis Police Officer misleading student activists and lying about her identity, the Vanguard received a tip that back in 2003, the university developed and maintained a “Police Intelligence Database.”
The Vanguard, after a series of denials, eventually got the University to admit that a “small” database existed back in 2003 and 2004. It was developed to track activists in 2003 in advance of a US Department of Agriculture Conference that they claimed was likely to be protested by many out of areas activists, some of whom they claimed threatened violence and disorder.
While the Vanguard has pushed hard against the tripling of water rates by the city, the city is looking for ways to avoid pricing people out of their homes with the rate hikes.
Due to the cost of constructing the surface water project through the Woodland and Davis Joint Powers Act, Davis water rates will rise each of the next five years and eventually triple to over 1300 dollars per year.
This is our new periodic round up of updates on cases we are tracking. Vanguard Court Watch will be following two trials this week.
Oscar Barrientos Second Trial Begins Today
Opening statements begin today in the case of Oscar Barrientos, accused of burglarizing a West Sacramento home. Mr. Barrientos had originally faced trial back in late March and early April, but the trial was cut abruptly short when Detective Tate from the West Sacramento Police Department had to rush to Florida for a family emergency.
Voters have overwhelmingly voted down the last two peripheral projects in Davis. Meanwhile, they overwhelming voted to retain Measure J which requires a vote for the city to be able to develop land outside of the current boundaries as well as to change zoning from agricultural to urban uses.
At the same time, planners and environmentalists have pushed for new developments to be denser, more compact and located closer to the core of town. The reasons for this vary between a principle of protecting farm land and open space, while at the same time expressing concerns about commuting during a time of high fuel prices and the need to convert from fossil fuel use and single-occupancy vehicles to more environmentally sustainable forms of transportation.
Two weeks ago, the Council received a status report on the application for an at-grade crossing. The council has, since January, opposed the construction of a 3800-foot long fence by the Union Pacific Railroad that threatens to cut off access to downtown by residents of Olive Drive.
Union Pacific has made it very clear that they intend to construct the fence, even without the city’s approval, for what they claim are issues of safety, but are more likely due to liability concerns.
One good thing about the Supreme Court’s ruling two weeks ago that California had to reduce its prison population is that, for once, we are getting a relatively honest debate on crime and incarceration. Part of that is due to the relatively low crime rates, so the population is not automatically convulsing into knee-jerk reactions.
Dan Walters in his column this morning writes, “While liberal critics of the state’s criminal justice system hailed it as a long overdue wake-up call for reform, conservatives raised the specter of felonious hordes being released to prey upon the public.”
The good news this week is that the Davis Enterprise finally figured out that the city’s water rates were going to triple. They ran a good article by Crystal Lee on the Proposition 218 process. They followed that up with an excellent piece by Jonathan Edwards on the tripling of the rate hikes.
Suddenly, now Bob Dunning for the first time has a piece on the water rate hikes entitled, “Your wallet: A river runs through it.”
The Contra Costa Times has a very interesting story on a California Supreme Court case that will decide whether Contra Costa prosecutors (and by extension all DA’s) should be required to run criminal background checks on police officers so defense attorneys can prepare to challenge their credibility before they are called as witnesses in court.
The article, “Should DA run rap sheets on police witnesses?” is probably mistitled, as we are not talking about police witnesses here, but rather arresting and investigating officers.
by Vanita Gupta, Center For Justice Special to the Vanguard
June 2011 has the unfortunate distinction of marking the 40th anniversary of President Richard Nixon’s declaration of a “war on drugs” – a war which has cost $1 trillion but produced little to no effect on the supply of demand for drugs.