Council Unanimously Approves Binding Vote For March Election
The council was out of time if they wanted the measure on the March 2013 ballot. Staff argued, at least persuasively enough, despite the fact that there was no cost-sharing agreement with Woodland and no rate recommendations from the Water Advisory Committee, that another delay in the election would not only likely spell the end of the partnership with Woodland, but delay the project by another year.
The result of that uncertainty pushed the council forward. It was clear from the start that the council would go to binding language. Brett Lee asked for language that would simply authorize the council to move forward with the project with few specifics in the actual ballot language. However, the city would be tied to the agreed-upon rates that would concurrently be approved through the Prop 218 process.