Month: May 2013

In the past few weeks, fueled by a few egregious anecdotes, opponents of AB 109, the state’s realignment program that shifts custody in certain non-violent, non-dangerous cases from the state to the county, have asserted that the program has failed and produced a spike in crime.

However, an early study conducted by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) shows no such finding.  According to a report release on Thursday, “One-year arrest rates are down and conviction rates are virtually static for offenders released after completing their state prison sentences post-Realignment.”

By Catherine McKnight

The jury trial of People v. Kumar continued on Wednesday, May 15, in Judge Mock’s courtroom. Rakesh Kumar is being charged with four counts including corporal injury, assault by force, and intimidating a witness and victim.

The lead detective in the case took the witness stand. She said Ms. Grom had told her that Mr. Kumar was willing to give her $50,000. Ms. Grom did not report any injuries or abuse until about two months after it happened – she said that this is not uncommon with domestic abuse, due to various reasons. A question was raised about whether or not the injuries seemed consistent with “being punched repeatedly in the face.” She said no, because there were no photos taken of the face.

In the early 1990s, despite years of decline in the actual crime rate, politicians took advantage of public angst and frustration with high profile crimes, gangs and the crack wars, to push through a series of very harsh penalties.  Over the course of the next two decades, the crime rates continued their drop from their late 1970s peak, as prisons filled up.

Realignment was the result of a federal court order for California to reduce its prison population.  It shifted prison populations from the state to counties.  While many accused realignment of simply shifting the problem, there was a strategic nature to that shift.  County prosecutors make the charging decisions and the hope was that by making counties responsible for their own prison population, it would change the way criminal charging occurred.

by Antoinnette Borbon

We knew going in that the murder trial against James Mings would not be straightforward.  It had its share of twists and turns, with the defense arguing that Mr. Mings was not the actual murderer.  The defense claims that Mings’ original attempts at murder, in the heat of the moment after the pleading from victim Kevin Seery to end his life, were unsuccessful.

It was unknown to Mr. Mings at the time that Mr. Seery was still alive and his accomplice, Thomas McDermott, may have choked him a second time and been the one to force the sock down his throat.

With all that has happened in the last week, I have neglected to circle back to the Banker’s Dozen case, whichsettlement I find to be truly strange.  The original case made for some fantastic headlines – the protesters starting in January 2012 managed to shut down a bank, day after day.  Some days the bank never bothered to open.

The university, fresh from the turmoil and university embarrassment over the handling of the pepper spray incident, was not keen on creating another opportunity to drag people out of the Memorial Union, handcuffed and escort them through potentially hostile student throngs.  So, after much deliberation, with the bank literally screaming to arrest the protesters, the bank finally shut their doors and ultimately sued the university.

Defendant Charged with Possession of Drugs, Weapons

By Virginia Hysell

On January 29, 2013, at approximately 7:05 a.m., Yolo County Deputy Sheriff’s Deputy Dugoenich responded to a 911 call in Knight’s Landing from Blanca Sentinman. She had reported that her boyfriend of a little less than 2 years, Alejandro Yanez-Garcia, was under the influence of  methamphetamines and had shot himself in the left arm. She reported that he had been in the bedroom at the residence, yelling in pain and screaming for his younger brother, Jonathan. When Blanca offered her assistance to her boyfriend he refused.

On May 10, 2013 the case of People v. Alejandro Yanez-Garcia (Case No. 13-575-2) was brought before Judge Paul K. Richardson in Department 1 of the Yolo Superior Court. The charges were alleged possession of illegal substance while in presence of a loaded and operable firearm, misdemeanor possession of paraphernalia, and possession of methamphetamine.

Last week, an 8-1 vote of the Mississippi Supreme Court halted the scheduled execution of Willie Manning a mere four hours before he was schedule to be put to death by lethal injection.  While 8 justices of the Court eventually did the right thing, the very fact that we came as close as we did to executing the man is a testament to the utter disaster the state of the justice system is in.

Remarkably, if we look at this case, long marred by racial bias in jury selection, there is actually no reliable evidence to sustain Mr. Manning’s 1994 conviction.

By Vanguard Court Watch Interms

Editor’s note: The following is sequential coverage of the trial of Ryan Baird who is charged with2^nd Degree Murder, Gross Vehicular Manslaughter and Driving Under the Influence of both alcohol and drugs for his role in an accident that resulted in the death of one of the passengers his vehicle.   Closing arguments concluded on Friday and the Jury broke for the day on Friday and will continue their deliberations on Monday.

Testimony Continues in Baird trial