The city council has approved a number of projects in recent years. Recently Lincoln40 was given a green light to go forward by a court, but the city will have decisions to make on Trackside – whether to bring it back to council or appeal an adverse court ruling.
In the meantime, Sterling Apartments is under construction, and Davis Live Student Housing and Chiles Road Apartments have been approved.
The Vanguard recently had an article on Paul’s Place, which could include the demolition of a current house at 1111 H Street and the building of a four-story structure that could accommodate micro-homes for people currently homeless.
The Vanguard also ran a series of articles on the Aggie Research Campus. Assistant City Manager Ashley Feeney, the Community Development Director, told the Vanguard that the city has no additional material from the developer outside of the letter to recommence the project that had previously been paused.
Back in October, Plaza 2555 came before the city council. The council at that time said they were unsure of the final form of Plaza 2555, but the councilmembers were convinced that the site should be residential rather than commercial, as currently zoned.
Councilmember Will Arnold defended the idea that the site should be changed to residential. He said that he was in favor of converting the site to residential, stating, “We are still very far behind in 
providing adequate rental housing for our citizens.” He said, “I find it somewhat interesting that folks that were opponents of these other projects that we’ve passed have said, well these projects passed we don’t need anything anymore. When they were fighting tooth and nail against those projects and at least three or four of them are still under lawsuits, so who knows what we’re going to get.”
According to the city, the project is somewhat in flux.
Ashley Feeney told the Vanguard that “the applicant has not withdrawn their application and said they would be reaching out for a meeting to discuss in the near future.”
Two newer projects are headed toward CEQA review.
In October 2018, the Vanguard reported that the U-Mall Redevelopment Plan would head to an EIR scoping meeting – which occurred in November.
This is a major project and one of the reported impacts has been the imminent closure of the iconic restaurant and sports bar, the Davis Graduate.
The site currently is an 8.25 acre parcel with 103,696 square feet of commercial uses, including retail and restaurants. Tenants include Trader Joe’s market, Forever 21, Cost Plus World Market, The Davis Graduate restaurant and sports bar, and smaller shops and services. Professional offices are located on a partial second floor.
The redevelopment project will involve the “demolition of approximately 90,653 square feet of the existing mall to create a mixed-use development.” The project would result in 264 multi-family residential units and 136,800 square feet of new retail uses.
“The addition of 136,800 square feet of retail uses would accommodate shops, restaurants and other uses,” they write in their proposal. “The proposed improvements and uses would revitalize the center and expand shopping and dining options for local residents. At buildout, the project would include approximately 808,500 square feet.
“The existing building that houses the mall retail uses would be demolished and rebuilt to include four levels of residential units over three levels of parking and four levels of residential units over retail uses,” they write. The overall proposed building height would be seven stories or approximately 80 feet.
Ashley Feeney told the Vanguard, “The administrative draft EIR is nearing completion.”
Sherri Metzker said the CEQA process is not close enough for an estimated release schedule, but she believes later summer or early fall.
The same is true for the University Research Park Mixed Use project.
“The CEQA document is being prepared for this project,” Mr. Feeney told the Vanguard.
The proposal is on an open parcel along Research Park Drive across the street from the Holiday Inn. In addition to the apartments, the site will contain 214 parking spaces and 216 bike parking spaces – 148 long-term spaces within the buildings and 68 short-term spaces scattered throughout the site. There will also be 40,000 square feet of open space within the project.
The goal of that project is to provide workforce housing, particularly for employees of the businesses in the research park.
It appears, at least with the two latter projects, we can expect a Draft EIR by the late summer and early fall. Meanwhile, the ARC will likely also have a progressive schedule, with their EIR already certified.
—David M. Greenwald reporting
In October 2018, the Vanguard reported that the U-Mall Redevelopment Plan would head to an EIR scoping meeting – which occurred in November.
This is a major project and one of the reported impacts has been the imminent closure of the iconic restaurant and sports bar, the Davis Graduate.
The issue of which current U-Mall tenants will chose to continue operations after the reconstruction is indeed a significant concern … especially with respect to the sales tax revenues the City receives.
One way to mitigate that issue would be to get the Amazon Fulfillment Center to move from its current on campus location to U-Mall. A relocationg there could mean all the Amazon orders delivered to the Fulfillment Center would be subject to the City’s 1.0% Measure O sales tax, as well as result in the City receiving a fair share of the 7.5% base sales tax amount.
The owners of U-Mall should actively pursue that commitment prior to the public hearings on their redevelopment application.
In addition, a U-Mall location would probably be more convenient for the majority of UC students than the current on campus location.
Not a bad concept as to use, per se, but how does one get a company, unrelated to the project to relocate? A ‘condition of approval’ for the project?
Just saying…
My sediments exactly.
I’m not concerned. Local businesses will be replaced by national chains, yielding the City their taxes.
Can you say gentrify? GENTRIFY!
Can you say gentrify? GENTRIFY!
Plaza 2555 is interesting, on many levels…
Creation of the parcel: came out of the circulation plan in the So Davis Specific Plan… developed (pun semi-intended) to try and thwart Mace Ranch Park proposals… preventing an OC of I-80, envisioned in former GP, to be an interchange w/I-80, @ CR 103 (now, Drummond) and connecting to Wilson Way (now a greenbelt).
Originally, the odd-shaped parcel was zoned as Commercial Recreation as I recall… non-res, but not straight commercial and definitely not Office, nor Industrial, nor Commercial.
The parcel’s “highest and best use”, based on its configuration, was Park and Ride (my opinion, at the time)… but MF appears to work… on transit routes, good bike connectivity, greenbelts and park close by, and Oakshade Town Center close by. Commercial/Innovation Park/Industrial etc… never was going to happen… you have to understand the configuration of the lot. No even semi-serious nibbles from anyone looking to do non-res. Since its creation. ~30 years ago…
We have yet to see “its final form”… but I agree, it is appropriate for MF…
Why is the “configuration” of the lot only suitable for residential development?
$
That’s what I figured, as well. Commercial interest reminds me of Goldilocks:
“too oddly-shaped”,
“too close to the freeway (except when it isn’t)”,
“not within 200 yards of UCD (except when it isn’t)”, etc.
A more likely reason is $, as in a lack of waiver of fees and taxes to “encourage” commercial interest. (In reference to Mori Seiki article, below.)
https://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/city/mori-seiki-opens-its-doors-to-the-community/
It seems that residential development interest is considerably less “fussy”.
And in this case, the developers are not even offering a “pretense” of mixed-use.
Same thing with the Chiles Road development, nearby. Where they’re actually tearing down a commercial building, and completely replacing it with apartments.
In your mind, with your filters.
If you don’t believe me, ask Jim Gray, or John Buckel… their profession is to market, find properties for businesses… John landed DTL (now DMG) which gave us Mori Seki… not sure what their charge out rates are… they understand what I’m saying… suspect I’d score 2-0 with both of them…
I may not be an expert in real estate, but have known well many who are. And they have shared their knowledge/insights with me.
Bill: I thought our exchange was going quite well, to expose the unsupported nature of your comments. Unfortunately, Don deleted them (or at least they’re stuck in moderation mode).
If your latest comment is allowed to remain, I’ll respond further. But, no sense in doing so, until we see what Don decides.
(I’ll go ahead and start responding, with the expectation that Don may delete some of these comments.)
So, these experts have personally told you:
1) the configuration of the Plaza 2555 site is “unsuitable” for commercial development (but is somehow perfectly suited for residential development), and
2) the Chiles Road site is saddled with a commercial building that can only be replaced with a residential building?
How about WDAAC? Any update on the development agreement, including the status of the “draft” Davis-Based Buyers Program?
There was something one the agenda for the Planning Commission this week pushed back to July 10. Have more obviously as it gets closer.