By David M. Greenwald
Executive Editor
Davis, CA – Every so often it is a good idea to put Davis within a national context. Davis has now fundamentally changed the way it handles certain types of calls for services—moving mental health calls to be handled by crisis responders rather than simply cops and moving homeless services, for instance, to a department of social services.
Matt Ferner, reporting in Safer Cities, notes that not only is it a trend, but it has strong backing from the public.
“Cities across the country–most recently smaller cities including Madison Wisconsin, Athens, Georgia, Overland Park, Kansas and Newport Beach, California–are rerouting 911 calls for mental health and homelessness-related situations away from police departments to medical professionals,” Ferner writes.
For one thing, “Medical professionals are better equipped to handle these calls. Their training means that they are better able to deescalate these tense situations and to connect the person in crisis with services and programs that will address the trauma and reduce the likelihood of future calls for service.”
Moreover, “Police officers are spread too thin. Asking officers to respond to homelessness-related calls or mental health crises means they are not doing the most important job that they are uniquely trained and qualified to do: solve serious crimes like murders and rapes.”
One of the points I tried to make earlier this week is that, while the city has not been able to find the funding to add 5 to 7 new police officers (which is a lot more than $434,000), by re-routing mental health crisis calls they could free up their existing officers to be more responsive to other calls.
Previous polling from Safer Cities and Data For Progress showed “a significant majority of voters want police departments to reallocate their resources to prioritize more time and money on solving these serious crimes. Rerouting certain 911 calls to civilian medical professionals frees police 
officers to focus their efforts and limited resources on that critical work.”
New polling from the two is reported this week. They conducted a national survey of 1223 likely voters using a web panel survey. The sample was weighted to be representative of likely voters by age, gender, education, race, and voting history. The margin of error is ±3 percentage points.
The findings here are pretty informative and give how far left Davis voters trend on such issues, and are probably in line with the public in Davis.
In addition to more than two-thirds of the respondents favoring medical professionals as first responders, they also found that nearly three-quarters support the creation of a new agency.
“73% of voters support creating a new agency of first responders, like emergency medical services or firefighters, to reroute some 911 calls away from armed police officers to medical professionals who are better situated to respond to mental health and homelessness related situations than armed police officers. (Net Support = +52)”
That means there is strong support nationally, therefore, to do what Davis has just done.
Keep in mind, Davis is a very heavily Democratic community. When it came to the 2020 Presidential election, just 11 percent voted for Trump. More people supported ending Measure J than extending Trump’s term another four years.
There is a rather sizable partisan split here. Overall, 73 percent of respondents supported a new agency, for example. But for Democratic respondents the number was 91 percent, with 49 percent of them strongly supporting and only four percent of Democrats opposing.
For Republicans, however, the support was more a modest 55-37 and just 16 percent strongly in favor.
Independents were at 67-24, slightly lower than the average of 73-21.
There is a sizable racial gap as well. Just 29 percent of whites were strongly supportive, but 70 percent overall. For Blacks it was 86-11 with 53 percent strongly in support.
All of this dovetails with our experience in Davis where there really was no opposition to the changes. Neither the police chief nor the DPOA weighed in. While council over the last year has received thousands of communications in support of the changes, they reported at the last meeting that they hadn’t received any opposition to it, at least in advance of the last meeting.
With their next question, they found “56% of voters would prioritize investing more money into medical professionals who respond to mental health and homelessness related situations even over investing more money in armed policing. “
There are partisan gaps in the responses to both questions, but once again, Republicans and Independents, while less likely than Democrats to support these kinds of changes, still are more likely than not to support them.
Matt Ferner writes: “Our survey results show that voters overwhelmingly support sending medical professionals instead of armed officers to mental health and homelessness related emergency service calls, and they also support the concrete step of creating new public agencies to carry out these services.”
He continues: “Crucially, in an era of constrained local budgets, most voters–and over three-quarters of Democrats–would prioritize investing more money into medical professionals who respond to mental health and homelessness related situations even over investing more money into armed policing.
“These results should send a loud signal to public officials that putting safety first means building and funding programs that recognize the difference between threats and trauma and tailor responses that work in parallel to and complement traditional policing,” he concludes. “Of these programs, very few of them are as popular with voters as enlisting medical professionals as emergency first responders.”
While we don’t have local polling on these questions, the magnitude of Democratic support combined with who responded publicly to the proposals is suggestive that the Davis community is probably in line with national Democrats as well as voters overall on this crucial issue.
“Data for Progress”? As in progress–ive? With a name like that I’d surely trust their ‘polls’! Just like I’d trust the polling from an organization called “Data for Trumpsters”.
Depends on if the wording of the poll was, “Do you support doing what Davis has just done?”
If you find a way not to keep that in mind, every day, let me know.
Related and/or makes the point . . . how?
That’s because these were sane and reasonable changes, not the more radical changes proposed by the more radically progressive folk.
As worded I’m not surprised 56% responded that way to that question. It’s pretty open and vague.
Yeah, exactly, and that’s why I’ve been so opposed to a separate phone number and supportive of all public safety services being under a common administrative and dispatching Public Safety umbrella, and I hope Davis finds its way to that structure. “recognize the difference between threats and trauma and tailor responses” means a common dispatching center, and letting professionals decide who gets served by whom. Can you imagine someone calls X11 and the social worker goes out and gets shot, or someone doesn’t believe in the new model and calls the police on a mental health issue? That was the stupidest idea ever.
The real issue is, there are going to be more calls for stupid ideas like ‘defund’ and ‘defang’ and ‘abolish’ and ‘slice & dice’ a separate phone lines and not enforcing traffic laws. My prediction: none of this is going to happen – despite that there will be a lot of noise.
Refund the police: Cities backtrack on 2020 clarion call amid crime spikes
https://news.yahoo.com/refund-police-cities-backtrack-2020-110000129.html
Maryland GOP Gov. Hogan takes push to ’refund the police’ to Virginia and beyond
https://news.yahoo.com/maryland-gop-gov-hogan-takes-110330329.html
Austin to Vote on Proposition A to Refund City Police
https://www.city-journal.org/austin-to-vote-on-proposition-a-to-refund-city-police
Furthering prediction: the new department is going to be the sum total of changes, and the Social Services budget will probably triple over the next five years – and maybe it should. I also predict the police department will not shrink, and maybe will even grow slightly so we can have a night bike officer busting people without bike lights — to satisfy that letter-to-the-editor that has run every few months for the last 40 years about the increasing and extremely dangerous phenomenon of bicycles without lights at night. Or . . . we could just establish a bounty of $500/head for vigilante automobile hunting of bicycles without lights. That would stop the problem fast!
And yet, just the other day – I recall that David claimed on this blog that (Davis) police already have a lot of “down time”.
So, which is it?
“What do we have for him, Johnny”? 🙂
I suggest when COVID ends, you go on a ride along – I have done so in at least 8 different jurisdictions. I gives you better context for your question “which is it”
You’re the one making opposing claims, not me.
And I’m trying to point you to ways to get a perspective on the issue that you lack imo right now.
It’s a hurry-up/ wait dynamic.