UCD Students Sit in Silent Protest Against Bigotry in UC System

Sit-in-1

Around 100 UC Davis students waged a silent sit-in yesterday in protest against acts of bigotry in the UC System over the past month.  The student wearing all black and tape or other coverings over their mouths, sat in silent protest yesterday.

The first hour was spent in the MU, the second hour at the Silo, and the event ended up at Mrak Hall.  Students every half an hour broke their silence to list their demands and every hour changed places, marching through campus also in silence.

This particular protest focus primarily on changes to African-American studies programs and other outreaches for African-America students.  While the events on UC Davis campus have capture attention of many students, particularly the Swastika carved into a Jewish student’s dormitory at Tercero and a spray-painted attack on the LGBT Center, other incidents system-wide particularly the “Compton Cookout” where a fraternity at UC San Diego mocked Black History Month with racial stereotypes and the noose found in a UC Santa Cruz bathroom, clearly impacted the students.

The list of demands includes the desire to bring the African and African-America studies program to full department status along with aggressive recruitment of African-American faculty across all disciplines and programs.

Sit-in-2

They also called for a full climate report “conducted by the Student Affairs and Research and Information (SARI) and Budget Office from our administration” this would include incoming class breakdown by race, class, gender, sexual orientation, retention & attrition data broken down along the same lines, and most notably a “report that includes any acts of hate/intolerance that occur on the campus and the specific response by the campus administration to such acts.”

Further demands include a response by the chancellor to the recent incidents, there is apparently the belief that while the Chancellor has given these incidents lip-service and emails, there has been a lack of response.

“That the chancellor respond to all of the recent racist and hate incidents that took place on our campus and the steps she is taking currently to prevent them in the future. We want to know how the chancellor will reassure us and that we will always remain safe on our campus. A simple email response, while appreciated is not a strong enough response to such acts of hate. In the future, we strongly recommend the first initiative action to come from our chancellor by taking pro-active steps to work with our community. Overall, we want the chancellor to have accountability and to speak against hate and keep transparency between the students, staff, faculty, and administration.”

Along with these are apparent concerns that African-American students lack resources and support on campus.  Some of the demands ask the university evaluate attrition rates, provide funding for a retention specialist, a student affairs officer position within African and African American studies, required meetings with an adviser prior to each quarter, and fund an African American male counselor to work with black males and student athletes housed in CAPS and in other places besides the African American studies department/program.

Sit-in-3

The final of the fourteen demands is as follows:

“Lastly, we require the Chancellor and the University show mutual respect for the “Principles of Community” and prioritize issues that have a positive impact on students of color and leading by example. We demand that there be repercussions when the “Principles of Community” are blatantly being violated. More specifically we demand that the university uphold the part within the principles of community when its states “We confront and reject all manifestations of discrimination, including those based on race, ethnicity, gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, religious or political beliefs, status within or outside the university, or any of the other differences among people which have been excuses for misunderstanding, dissension or hatred. We recognize and cherish the richness contributed to our lives by our diversity. We take pride in our various achievements, and we celebrate our differences.””

When the student arrived at Mrak Hall they were greeted by three top level administrators, Bob Loessberg-Zahl, Assistant Executive Vice Chancellor, Offices of the Chancellor and Provost, Rahim Reed Associate Exectuive Vice Chancellor for Campus Community Relations, and Pat Turner Vice Provost of Undergraduate Studies.

Mr. Loessberg-Zahl initially extended her concern for the acts of hate on campus while Rahim Reed announced plans to call in an emergency hearing tomorrow with the Campus Council of Diversity to look at the students’ petitions and their proposals for increasing minority support. This is a closed meeting, but they hope to make a standing committee with students from different clubs to process all of the issues.

Sit-in-4

A number of students expressed concerns that there was a conspiracy to cover up the three incidents where swastikas were either carved or spray-painted on various parts of campus, in hopes that the incidents will blow over.  Mr. Loessberg-Zahl stated that they were not sure if they could even process and punish these acts of vandalism with the swastika as a hate crime.

Pat Turner said that one problem with the lack of African-American professors is that there is simply not a lot of minority PHD applicants in the pool.

This statement appeared to anger many and one female African-American students emphasized how uncomfortable she feels as an African-American in Davis, that there is a reputation among African-Americans that Davis is unwelcoming to minorities, particularly African-Americans.

Sit-in-5

The students communicated to the Administrators that they felt under-appreciated for their work.  There was an overall sense that while the students feel this is a “state of emergency” that the students sense a lack urgency on the part of the administration.  They are disappointed that administration was not proactive and failed to action previously.  Instead they waited until a hate crime was committed to do so.

Many of the students felt that their cries for help are not taken into concern, mostly because they have had three previous protests and the Chancellor has not been present once.

While a number of students left the meeting angry, some students schedule a talk with Rahim Reed along with some African American faculty members at UC Davis.

—David M. Greenwald reporting

Vivian Nguyen contributed to this report

Author

  • David Greenwald

    Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

    View all posts

Categories:

Students

10 comments

  1. I commend these students for not becoming violent or disruptive. They are trying to effect change the right way – working within the system. Let’s see how receptive the UC adminstration is to the demands…relative to the students who tried to take their protest out onto I-80.

  2. Reading this and all the news reports on “the rise of hate on campuses”, I can’t help but think of the 90/10 rule: 10% of life is made up of what happens to you. 90% of life is decided by how you react; or the 80/20 rule (Pareto Principle): roughly 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes.

    I believe that the left and the media developed a racism template beginning in the 1960s when our true civil rights transformations occurred, and today, even when a fractional percentage of bigotry exists, cannot let go of the story line. Another ways these two rules can apply:
    -80-90% of the media chatter comes from 10-20% of societal activity
    -The last 10-20% of any problem will take 80-90% of the effort to correct
    -10-20% of the population demand 80-90% of the attention

    If we were to take an accurate cross section of America, I bet we would find far fewer true white Christian (about the only group not represented as needing protection) racists than the media attempts to imply with their common story line.

    However, I believe there is a resurgence of a form of white anger developing in this country that manifests as indicative of racism. The TEA Parties are a prime example for what is occurring and I think we may be seeing the tip of the iceberg for a new type of group conflict the pits working class whites against the thousands of other protected groups that have achieved greater security through the statutes and social progression hatched from the civil rights movement.

  3. A bet…

    If anyone in the media has the stones to actually investigate this “wave of hate” they will find that the bulk of these hateful and racist acts were caused by the organizers of these events.

    Sorry folks, the KKK and the Aryan nation are not alive and well on the UC campuses, and if they were, a picture of a noose and a scrawled swatstika are hardly the way they would express themselves. The incidents are nonsensical efforts by the organizers of the events to try and get attention. Come on, Nazis don’t chalk on the quad…

    In short- I decalare shananigans…

  4. I totally agree with you Gunrock. Wasn’t there an incident on campus a few years ago where they found that the culprit was the activist that was trumpeting it?

  5. I don’t recall that, I do recall someone reporting a crime, maybe an assault off campus that turned out to be fabricated, but I don’t remember any on campus incident that turned out to be a culprit, but my memory only goes back to about 1996 on such things.

    I agree with Gunrock that the KKK and Aryan nation are likely not alive and well on the UC Davis campus, but I do think the point that Lt. Carmichael made that the student with the swastika on her door was likely targeted by someone in her dorm or someone given access to her dorm by a neighbor. That is unsettling.

    What is also unsettling is that the people I worry about coming on campus are not KKK or Aryan Nation types who are well marginalized in society, but rather ordinary individuals acting out of some sort of malice.

  6. As I vaguely remember, there was a protest on campus a few years ago and as I recall a feminist speaker’s car was vandalised and it was supposedly found out that she had done it herself. My memory isn’t what it used to be and I can’t find the story online. Anyone else recall?

  7. Nice link Don and I quote:

    [quote]The rise in phoney antisemitic hate crime hoaxes occurs whenever gentiles start getting smart about the “behind the curtain schemes” that Jews perpetrate on host countries. The “hate crimes” are used to instill guilt on gentiles and to scare their own community into giving money to the Zionist leaders and to organizations such as the JDL, ADL and the Simon Wiesenthal Center. [/quote]

    Geez, link onto a white supremacy site?

Leave a Comment