Guest Commentary: Reject Commission Proposal and Adopt Alternative
As you know, Agenda Item 06-B on the Dec. 3, 2024 City Council agenda presents the latest…
As you know, Agenda Item 06-B on the Dec. 3, 2024 City Council agenda presents the latest…
On Monday, the Davis community radio station KDRT began airing an half-hour radio program by local journalist…
This fall, Davis Mayor Josh Chapman and Councilmember Bapu Vaitla asked our city commissioners for feedback on…
Mayor Josh Chapman and Councilmember Bapu Vaitla recently began asking city commissioners for feedback on a proposal…
About 60 interested seniors were in attendance at the Aug. 28, 2012 scheduled Senior Citizens of Davis (SCD) Board meeting, ready to weigh in on agenda items. They gathered in the previously arranged for MPR East at the Davis Senior Center, which seats well over a hundred people. On the agenda were the following items:
By E. Roberts Musser
In my capacity as an attorney and as a consumer advocate, I was asked by SCD members to review the new proposed bylaws. I gave my honest legal opinion the proposed changes were not in the best interests of SCD, nor its membership. Some concerned SCD members took their complaints to the Davis Senior Citizens Commission. It was there that SCD Board President John Gerlich was encouraged by Commissioners to slow down the process and obtain more member input before putting the matter to a vote.
There was a recent article that appeared in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS December 2011-Vol. 59, NO. 12 Autonomy When Doctors and Daughters Disagree), in regard to the limitations of advanced health care directives (AHCDs). A case study cited in the article is illustrative of the difficulties inherent in these problematic legal documents.
An 83 year old woman with multiple and massive health problems, completed a legal advanced directive at her primary care physician’s office, expressing a wish to forgo intubation and any attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation should the need arise. Once this elderly lady did become acutely ill, she was rushed to the emergency room for medical treatment. Emergency personnel asked the family for permission to intubate, and the woman’s two daughters agreed. This was done despite the patient’s previously expressed wishes to the contrary, which all parties were well aware of.
Reasons to do this project sooner rather than later:
Nevertheless, this widow revealed to me that she never had “sex” with this man, per se. But the poor soul admitted they had been intimate enough for her to contract genital herpes from him. Perplexed, I fearlessly waded in and asked for more specifics on how this could happen. But she was too embarrassed to give me the gory details. What she did say is that she confronted her lover about him having infected her knowing he already had the sexually transmitted disease. His response was nonchalant and dismissive. He didn’t care, especially because their relationship had already ceased to exist.
I had occasion to fly between the West and East Coasts over the winter holidays. On the return flight through Baltimore-Washington International Airport, I was one of the “lucky” passengers who was separated from my adult children and “randomly” selected for subjection to extra security measures. As I stood patiently in the long line to go through the new airport scanning machines, the lady in front of me loudly voiced her displeasure: “I paid extra for business class tickets. I shouldn’t have to wait in line like this, or be separated from my husband. I cannot believe how I am being treated. This is just disgusting. Can you believe this?”
As this woman continued to arrogantly complain, an airport security guard began walking through our line, emphatically declaring: “Anyone not cooperating with security measures will be removed from the line and ejected from the airport if necessary. I will remove you from this facility if I am forced to. If everyone cooperates, the lines will move more quickly.”
First, it discussed why pensions are a problem. It gives two basic reasons:
Requests for subscription renewal would come in the mail for the husband on a steady basis, to magazines he had already paid for ten times over. Because of his failing memory, he would completely forget he had already paid for the subscription on numerous occasions prior in a matter of a few months. The more frequently he would pay, the more often the subscription renewal forms would come in. Eventually the deluged old fellow was getting one notice a month for each of numerous magazines and newsletters.
Councilmember Greenwald stated she could not support any contract “that doesn’t make the necessary reforms in the cafeteria cash-out and allow us to put it towards paying off our unfunded health liabilities”. Assistant City Manager Paul Navazio clarified that the total compensation figures do count the value of the cafeteria cash-out. When Council member Greenwald tried to respond to Mr. Navazio’s statement, Mayor Saylor forbid further commentary. He would not recognize her, despite her having raised a point of order. Instead Mayor Saylor emphatically stated “as presiding officer” he would “take a vote”. Council member Greenwald was helpless to do anything without running the risk of censure or being stripped of a committee/commission assignment.
In essence, the Senior Housing Guidelines encompass the following principles to direct the senior housing development process:
An article appeared in the Davis Vanguard Feb. 8, 2010, in regard to a suggestion by City Staff that the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) have fewer meetings to save staff time. Apparently the Safety Advisory and Bicycle Commissions have already agreed to reduce their meeting frequency. However, Commissioners of the NRC felt fewer meetings would merely result in longer meetings, but wouldn’t result in decreasing staff time. It should also be noted about three years ago, there was an unsuccessful push to eliminate the Senior Citizens Commission by the City Council Subcommittee on Commissions (Mayor Ruth Asmundson, Councilmember Steve Souza), presumably to trim staff time.
There has been much talk about the crushing workload of City Council members, for virtually no pay; and the partisan bickering with colleagues that makes sitting on the City Council particularly unpleasant. Essentially it has been posited that being on the City Council is a thankless job, with little in the way of rewards. That is unless a Council member has higher political aspirations, and is using his/her seat on the City Council as a launching pad to bigger and better things.