In 2004, the voters of Davis passed a half-cent sales tax that was supposed to preserve city services from cuts. Instead what we saw is that the $3 million for sales tax went almost directly to a 36% pay increase for firefighters. It did not “preserve” city services from cuts, rather it increased the cost of city services to the taxpayer.
Fueled by the increased revenue from sales taxes and booming property tax revenues, the city went on a spending spree that it will likely pay for for the rest of our lives, obligating tens of millions to people well after they have ceased to work for the city of Davis.
Last week we reported that city staff was bringing Verona, a project on the corner of Fifth and Alhambra that was approved in July of 2008 back to amend the development agreement. To date, like most other project that have been approved by council in the last two years, there has been no building permits pulled nor construction that has begun.
On May 12, there was an emergency hearing of the Planning Commission where suddenly the Verona project was brought back with major changes. Because of the nature of the Planning Commission meeting, there were two members absent, in addition, there were already two vacancies, which means that the final vote to move this to council occurred with just four commissioners by a 3-1 vote.
It has been a long week and thus instead of completing all of the candidates interviews this week, we have only gotten to two interviews. On Monday we ran Joe Krovoza’s interview. Today we will run Jon Li’s interview.
Vanguard: You have been a harsh critic of the city throughout your campaign, can you explain what’s wrong with the way the city operates from your perspective?
Rochelle Swanson Surges into Second Place in Money Race
Thursday marked the disclosure deadline in the Davis City Council race along with Measures Q and R. We have learned several interesting things yesterday. In the council race, Joe Krovoza remains the run away leader in contributions, but Rochelle Swanson who got a late start has now surged to second place, while Sydney Vergis lags the field.
In the meantime, we can now put tangible numbers on the Independent Expenditure (IE) campaign by Marty West and Ruth Asmundson which has garnered a good deal of probably unwanted attention this week. As regular readers know the Vanguard has filed two complaints against that IE alleging that they had not disclosed their spending in a timely manner subject to Davis City Municipal Code section 12.01.055(c).
Just when you thought you have read your last candidates’ forum, the UC Davis student government, ASUCD, held its own candidates forum on campus Wednesday evening focusing largely on student issues. While the focus was clearly student oriented, a lot of the issues bleed nicely into broader community concerns on issues such as Picnic Day, Noise, West Village and many others.
The election is now just under two weeks away, but this was another opportunity for the students and also the public to hear where the candidates stand and make their final decision. The format was a bit different from other formats, one candidate would be asked a question and get two minutes to respond and some of the other candidates could jump in and respond for one minute.
As the Vanguard reported on Sunday and again on Tuesday, Mayor Ruth Asmundson and Retired UC Davis Law Professor Marty West filed a form 410 and created an Independent Expenditure Committee entitled, “Committee to Support Sydney Vergis for City Council 2010.” We have argued that the group is in violation of the “behest of” clause in FPPC regulations that prohibits independent expenditure committees that are “made under the control or at the direction of, in cooperation, consultation, coordination, or concert with, at the request or suggestion of, or with the express, prior consent of.”
On Tuesday, the Vanguard learned that contrary to the information provided by City Clerk Zoe Mirabile, that the city is the appropriate venue to file a complaint against a violation of City Municipal Code section 12.01.055(c) which stipulates in the event that an independent expenditure committee spends more than $250 that they are required to notify “the city clerk and all candidates running for the same seat within twenty-four hours by facsimile transmission, overnight delivery, or personal delivery each time this two hundred fifty dollar threshold is met. This notice shall include a copy of any mailing or advertisement produced, if applicable.” As such, the complaint will be filed this morning.
The Davis City Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to impose the City’s last, best and final offer to the city’s largest bargaining unit, the Davis City Employee’s Association (DCEA). Dozens of the members of DCEA showed up at the council meeting last night, there were accusations leveled toward the city about unfair labor practices, accusations leveled that the city was bent on imposing this.
From the city’s perspective, DCEA was simply unwilling to go to the bargaining table and negotiate in good faith. And while other bargaining groups accepted concessions, most of which the Vanguard has argued fell well short of what was needed to have occurred, our understanding of DCEA is that their last, best, and final offer to the city fell well short of even those.
On Sunday the Vanguard reported that we would be filing an FPPC complaint against an independent expenditure committee created by Mayor Ruth Asmundson and Retired UC Davis Law Professor Marty West, “Committee to Support Sydney Vergis for City Council 2010,” for violating the “behest of” clause in FPPC regulations that prohibits independent expenditure committs that are “made under the control or at the direction of, in cooperation, consultation, coordination, or concert with, at the request or suggestion of, or with the express, prior consent of.”
We wrote on Sunday, the idea that the Mayor would involve herself without the prior consent of her daughter does not pass the smell test. The Vanguard believes that the Mayor would not have involved herself without discussing this first with her daughter and/ or other members of the campaign. The relationship between the Mayor and her daughter, a key player in the Vergis campaign, presents an inherent conflict when attempting to maintain the appearance (as well as fact) that this is an effort completely independent of the official campaign organization as the independent expenditure law requires.
As we head down to the final stretch in the 2010 Davis City Council campaign, the Vanguard will this week publish our interviews of candidates. The Vanguard took previous statements and positions that the candidates have taken to explore more deeply or to clarify on issues that have been presented both in campaign material as well as the candidate’s forums. We begin today with Joe Krovoza.
Vanguard: What would you describe as your general philosophy on land use, development and the ag-urban boundary?
The Vanguard learned on Friday that former School Board Member Marty West and Mayor Ruth Asmundson have filed the FPPC Form 410 to create an independent expenditure committee to Support Sydney Vergis for City Council. The Committee’s title is, “Committee to Support Sydney Vergis for City Council 2010.” On Monday, the Vanguard will file a complaint alleging that Mayor Ruth Asmundson’s relationship with Sydney Vergis campaign treasurer and adviser Alinia Asmundson leads to the inevitable conclusion that there was prior communication and approval by a key adviser to the Vergis campaign.
According to the FPPC Manual, “An “independent expenditure” is a payment for a communication that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified California state or local candidate or the qualification, passage, or defeat of a clearly identified state or local ballot measure, and the communication is not coordinated with or “made at the behest” of the affected candidate or committee.”
Yesterday I was interviewing Jon Li, candidate for the Davis City Council for an interview that will be published along with interviews with the other candidates starting on Monday. He made an interesting point to me that this council was elected three months before the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
The world of the 2008 City Council campaign saw a major focus on growth and Stephen Souza and Don Saylor argued that we needed to meet our internally generated housing needs, they spoke about a low vacancy rate, they spoke about students commuting in and out of Davis, a lack of range of housing within the city, and of course the lack approved projects and lack of building permits.
Current Funding Levels will Take us Into the Fair PCI Range by 2012 –
Last week, we reported on the increasingly dire situation involving the city’s ability to perform very basic city services such as pave streets. As the Vanguard has reported, the city for a number of years has maintained a road maintenance budget that is less approximately 800,000 dollars per year which is about 1.2 million dollars less than what is needed. The result is the city has built up more than a five million dollar backlog of maintenance needs.
Last Tuesday acting public works director Bob Clarke gave a report on the public works department. “In addition to the staffing cuts,” he reported, “our approximately $1 million a year road maintenance budget is down to $250,000 next year, which won’t buy us much pavement out in the field next year.”
The conventional wisdom in this council election is that Joe Krovoza is the front runner and likely to finish first and that second place will come down to Sydney Vergis and Rochelle Swanson. Often in Davis, conventional wisdom is not so conventional and things do not work out as planned. Nevertheless, if true, the prospects of Rochelle Swanson received a big boost on Wednesday as Councilmember Lamar Heystek added his name to her endorsement list.
It has been a good week and a half for Ms. Swanson’s candidacy as she received both the Sacramento Bee and Davis Enterprise endorsements in addition to receiving endorsements from Mayor Ruth Asmundson and past mayor and current councilmember Sue Greenwald. Rochelle Swanson is trying to carve out the progressive wing of Davis politics, securing endorsements from both Mr. Heystek and Sue Greenwald, along with other past leaders like former Mayor Bill Kopper and Councilmember Mike Harrington.
According to the courts (Honorable v. Easy Life Real Estate System), reverse redlining is the practice of extending credit on unfair terms to specific geographic areas due to income, race or ethnicity. So typically, reverse redlining occurs in neighborhoods with high concentrations of ethnic minorities. However, I have a sneaking suspicion, as do other consumer organizations, the elderly were another target for extending mortgage credit on unfair terms. The result has been a foreclosure crisis of immense proportions and far reaching consequences beyond just ethnic minorities or the elderly. Everyone is being effected by the mortgage meltdown, young and old alike, regardless of cultural background. Reverse redlining harms everyone.
Extending mortgage credit on unfair terms is a form of predatory lending. Major indicators of predatory mortgage lending are:
In July of 2008, the City Council approved an 83 unit single-family residential development on the corner of Fifth Street and Alhambra. To date, much like most other recently approved developments, there has been no building permits pulled nor construction that has begun.
However, for reasons not completely clear, on May 12, there was an emergency hearing of the Planning Commission where suddenly the Verona project was brought back with major changes. Because of the nature of the Planning Commission meeting, there were two members absent, in addition, there were already two vacancies, which means that the final vote to move this to council occurred with just four commissioners by a 3-1 vote.
Last fall, when the council was debating whether or not to approve a development proposal at the 29 unit project Willowbank in South Davis, the question came up as to whether or not this was the appropriate time to approve new development units. Problem as acknowledged by council and staff was a large number of units approved but not built due to the economic downturn and the decline of the real estate market.
Concerns were raised and the Mayor went as far as to suggest that they may consider time limitations on entitlements to encourage the developers to build in a more timely manner in order to avoid a glut on the market when things finally improved.
The other day I was reading a little blurb from Steven Greenhut, the right wing or libertarian depending on your perspective, who has led the charge for pension reform. He was talking about an experience in the PERS committee listening to testimony over SB 919, a pension-reform bill.
What caught my attention in particular was the union representatives kept talking about the fact that pension liabilities can be fixed at the bargaining table. Now Mr. Greenhut called that utter nonsense and argued that “the unions control the bargaining table. It’s been at the bargaining table where these massive liabilities have been created.”
Measure Q is the renewal of a half cent sales tax in Davis which generates on average three million dollars in general fund revenue. The League of Women Voters forum gave us the opportunity to hear the Yes on Measure Q side as presented by Councilmember Sue Greenwald and the Non on Measure Q side as presented by David Musser, a Davis resident.
In addition, on Sunday, the Davis Enterprise published an op-ed written by four of the Davis City Councilmembers and three other individuals in support of the sales tax renewal.
Endorsement Caps of a Great Week for Swanson and a Tough Week For Vergis –
For the second time this week, Joe Krovoza and Rochelle Swanson have received a major endorsement, this time from the Davis Enterprise.
The Enterprise has a history of supporting the pro-growth candidates and policies, indeed going back to 2002, Sue Greenwald in 2004 is the only non-pro-growth candidate to receive an endorsement. The Enterprise supported both Covell Village and Target. But times have changed, and the most burning issue has not been growth this year, but the budget and the Enterprise has fairly consistently been critical of the current council’s budget and spending priorities.
Last week, when the League of Women Voters held their forum, they not only had a candidates for with the city council candidates, but they also had the only discussion on Measure Q and Measure J.
Last week, we covered the candidate’s portion of the forum except for one question, which deal with Measure R. Today we are going to cover that question and then the discussion between Mark Spencer who represented the Yes on R side and former Davis Mayor Jerry Adler who was opposing the renewal of Measure J in Measure R.