City of Davis

Commentary: Beware of the Eastern Flank of Town in Business Park Discussion

citycat.pngThere has been a lot of discussion following the story on the Business Park Study project.  Much of that has focused on the issue of Cannery Park and the implications for what should happen with that project.  While I understand that focus, I think there is a big looming issue that goes beyond Cannery Park.

That is the issue of 215 acres of business park build out over a 25 year period.  Granted that is a long period of time, but the issue itself forces a discussion of peripheral development and building on farmland.  The city has only 140 acres of potential business park with Cannery included in the mix.  That means even considering Cannery the city is looking at 75 acres of development on agricultural land.

Analysis: City Hall Bought and Paid For by Firefighters Local 3494

davis_firedepartmentNearly a month ago, the Vanguard ran a story asking why firefighters make substantially more than police officers in comparable positions.  This was after Councilmember Lamar Heystek posed questions to city staff.

In particular, the Vanguard learned that while the two positions appear to be similarly funded, the Firefighter II position is not the equivalent of the Police Sergeant position.  When Councilmember Heystek asked Bill Emlen what the comparable front line supervisory positions were for police and fire, City Manager Bill Emlen responded:

NRC Sends Proposed New Wood Burning Restrictions Back to City Council

citycat

SPECIAL TO THE VANGUARD –

On June 22, the NRC received testimony from Dr. Tom Cahill on the highly anticipated Wood Smoke Study he did in Davis last winter. Vanguard readers may recall that a decision by the City Council on the then proposed wood burning restrictions recommended by the NRC last November was deferred at the Council meeting on January 6 of this year. The basis for the decision was to allow the wood smoke study proposed by Dr. Cahill and staff to be completed and the results reviewed by the NRC.

Commentary: Council Cuts To Police Oversight Put Community At Risk

landy_blackWas it really just three years ago that the city of Davis was on the brink?  The city was making regional even national news in a bad way.  The case of young Halema Buzayan punctuating a string of complaints against the Davis Police Department. 

For those not familiar with that case, it should have been a simple case.  The then 16-year-old Buzayan was arrested in June of 2005 for an alleged hit-and-run.  Whether or not the teen was driving the vehicle or the vehicle made contact with the other car are in doubt.  What is not in doubt was a decision to go into the family’s home at night and arrest the girl in her pajama’s.  The family then alleged a series of civil rights violations followed from that point in time, the most serious the allegation that the officer involved ignored pleas for an attorney.  That case is still pending before federal court.  It is moving slowly but depositions have or will shortly begin.

Council Fails to Deal With Structural Issues As Budget Pictures Comes Into Focus

citycatAt last night’s Davis City Council meeting, the City Council went through the budget section by section.  While the efforts of Councilmember Lamar Heystek to introduce an alternative budget two weeks ago gained some concessions from the Council majority, Councilmember Heystek and Councilmember Sue Greenwald found themselves on the short of end of 3-2 votes on the key issues.

The bottom line was the failure of the Davis City Council to adequately address the looming structural issues of employee compensation at this meeting.  The short-term budget remains to be balanced through cutbacks to programs rather than changes to way the city funds employee compensation.

BEDC Votes Not to Consider Exemptions to Measure J At This Time

citycatCity Staff Presents Intriuging Preliminary Study of Business Park Needs for the City –

The Davis City Council a few weeks ago directed that three of the commissions look into the question of whether Measure J should have a business park exemption during their vote to place a renewal on the ballot that would sunset in 2020.

Last night, the first of those commissions, the Business and Economic Development Commission (BEDC) would take the matter into consideration.  From the onset, the commission was clearly not comfortable with the vague directive.  For the most part they seemed inclined not to grant an exemption, but they were not ready to definitively reach that verdict instead they voted by a 7 to 1 vote to recommend no exemption at this point in time.  The one dissenting vote actually wanted an qualifier removed.

Staff Report Largely Rejects Heystek’s Budget Alternative

citycatTwo weeks ago, Councilmember Lamar Heystek caught the city council and most of city staff off-guard when he moved from the dais to the staff table and began to present a full alternative budget.  The crux of his budget was to do what city staff had refused to do shift the burden of the budget deficit from short-term savings plans that would have to be made permanent due to the current projections for the city to longer term structural fixes to the city’s budget.

Following Councilmember Heystek’s lead has been Councilmember Stephen Souza who proposed his own alternative budget.  One of the key provisions for that budget however is his projection that the city due in part to Target will actually see an increase in revenue from sales and property taxes.  Our analysis on Sunday leads us to conclude that his projected 1% growth in revenues is highly unlikely given the current economy and the city of Davis’ reliance on state and university jobs that figure to impacted by the ongoing crisis at the state level.  Instead, it may be more likely that the city experiences another drop in revenue close to the 14% it has suffered during the past fiscal year.

Examination of Budget Proposals: Proposed Cut to Davis Media Access and Sales Tax Assumptions

citycatThe Numbers Do Not Appear to Add Up For Souza’s Projected Tax Revenue Growth –

Since looking at the entire budget proposals can be rather daunting, today I want to focus on two specific proposals, which in most respects are entirely unrelated.  The Vanguard has joined Councilmember Lamar Heystek in opposing many of the programmatic cuts for the city as embodied in the Tier 1 and Tier 2 reductions.  One of the big cuts in the Tier 1 and 2 reductions is the cutting of 27,000 dollars to Davis Media Access.

For the past year and a half, Vanguard Radio has operated on KDRT 95.7 run by the Davis Media Access.  In addition, Davis Media Access also operates DCTV.  While many do not take advantage of the community based television, we view it as another means by which to inform the community of Davis in a very intimate way via television.  Davis is in many ways a victim of being trapped in the Sacramento media market, there are no Davis-based television stations.  That pales to many other college towns and communities of this size that find themselves less a part of a larger city’s media market.  Growing up in San Luis Obispo, we not only had our own TV station and multiple radio stations, but there were nearby stations from Santa Maria and Santa Barbara that would also cover local news.  That does not occur in Davis very often unless there is a major burning issue.

Mayor Asmundson Brazenly Shreds Notions of Open Meetings and Public Discourse

citycatAgenda Overload Cancels Budget Discussion–Time Limitations on Questions Thwart Dissent

Since the beginning of her second term as Mayor, Mayor Ruth Asmundson has looked for ways to speed up meetings in an effort to end meetings earlier and limit discussion.  There are some good reasons to avoid meetings continuing past midnight let alone past 1 am.  However, first through a limitation of public discussion and now a strict limitation on council questions and comments, the Mayor has now put the very notion of open meetings and open deliberations into question.

The meeting this past Tuesday illustrates the point to its ultimate absurdity as Councilmember Stephen Souza had to resort to reading his questions really fast (almost sounding like the chipmunks) and Community Development Director Katherine Hess resorted to one word answers in order to get all of the questions that he had answered.  The absurdity of the moment, punctuated by his steadfast and inexplicable refusal to vote to extent his own time.

COMMENTARY: Council Senior Housing Committee Plan Makes Little Sense

covell_village.jpg

Lost in the fray of developer driven project priorities is the fact that it makes very little sense to have a discussion of senior housing based on a such a narrow segment of our community.

Let me back up here for a moment.  Last week, it was determined by a 3-2 vote at the council meeting with the usual suspects supporting it and Councilmembers Lamar Heystek and Sue Greenwald opposing, that there would be some sort of community based discussion on senior housing needs.

COMMENTARY: Heystek’s Budget Changes the Game, But Will Council Listen?

lamar_heystekThe problem is a small city, city manager government is that staff runs City Hall.  Councilmembers are dependent on staff reports to be able to govern.  Staff is not assigned individually to elected city councilmembers, instead they collectively serve the council and by extension and default, the council majority.

That gives a tremendous advantage to council majorities who can gain from city staff the formulation and justification of their policies.  That makes what happened on Tuesday night all the more remarkable.  Councilmember Lamar Heystek took the highly unusual stance of sitting down at the staff table and presenting his own alternative budget.

Covell Village Redux Supporters Play Hardball

covell_village.jpg

The Vanguard has received a letter sent to City Council, City Staff, and the Senior Citizens Commission complaining about comments made by Stephen Hayes, a Senior Citizens Commission member at the June 2, 2009 Davis City Council meeting.  His offense?  Speaking out against the proposed senior citizens development.

The individual writes:

Heystek Presents Alternative Budget Proposal

lamar_heystekLast night during the Davis City Council Meeting, Councilmember Lamar Heystek began to take matters into his own hands as frustration about the city’s budget proposal has grown.  Instead of merely opposing the current proposals laid out by finance director Paul Navazio, the councilmember boldly proposed his own alternative.

There are two key planks to the alternative budget as laid forth by Mr. Heystek.  First, the belief that the current 850,000 dollar reduction in salary compensation which represents perhaps a little over 3% of their total budget is insufficient.  Councilmember Heystek instead proposed a 5% reduction in total compensation for employees.

Substitute Motion: Council Majority Bollixes Measure J Renewal

citycatCouncil last night had a series of dizzying substitute motions during the course what should have been a fairly routine discussion on the renewal of Measure J.  As a result, the council might have passed the renewal of Measure J–they appear to have–or they might have created a whole new monster that will complicate the process of simple renewal.

A couple of dozen citizens came out on Tuesday night, all but one in support of the renewal of Measure J with no sunset and no exemptions.  The one exception was the owner of the 43-acre Signature property just east of Harper Junior High and south of the Mace Curve.  He argued for the inclusion of his property as an exemption to Measure J.

Is the City Budget Short-Selling the Public?

citycatThe city of Davis will ostensibly be passing a budget on June 23, 2009.  Included in that budget will be about 15.5 FTE positions cuts and another 1.5 million dollars in the tiered program reductions.   Total savings to the city will be 3.4 million dollars and the budget will on paper be balanced.

As we look more closely at the budget, one is likely to become skeptical about the plan.

City Staff Recommends Renewal of Measure J Basically Intact

citycatFive Year Sunset Clause Problematic However

The issue of the renewal of Measure J was at one point expected to be rather controversial.  However at least looking at the staff report, that may not be the case.

In 2000, Measure J was passed by the voters of Davis by a 53.6% yes vote giving the citizens the right to vote and determine whether land can be re-designated from Agriculture or Open Space to any urban usage.  The measure however, sunsets at the end of 2010 and must be reconsidered by the voters.

Westlake Property Remains Out of Compliance With City Codes

westlake.jpgBack on April 1, the Vanguard visited the Westlake site and took photos of possible code violations.  The Vanguard has now learned that following those photos, the city of Davis issued a notice of Violation to the property owners on April 9, 2009.

In particular, two items were cited, the loading dock “filled with earth” and a cracked window that had been boarded over.

VANGUARD REPORT: Covell Village Campaign Failed to Disclose Hundreds of Thousands in Campaign Expenditures

covell_village.jpg

On November 3, 2005, literally four days before the 2005 election that would see Measure X, the Measure J vote that Davis voters would overwhelming vote down by a 60-40 margin, an article ran in the Davis Enterprise, whereby the No on Measure X campaign complained among other things that the Covell Village Company and their “Smart Planning – Yes on X” Campaign had failed to disclose the true cost of more than a dozen glossy campaign mailers sent to thousands of Davis voters as well as other campaign expenses such as campaign worker salaries.

The Vanguard has now learned over three and a half years later that there was significant merit to that complaint. On April 3, 2008 three amended statements  using the Fair Political Practice Commission (FPPC) California Form 460 were filed with the Davis City Clerk, two and a half years after the termination of campaign papers were filed on January 31, 2006 claiming a zero balance and a final expenditure of $385,274.75 for the campaign that lasted from July 28, 2005 until December 31, 2005.