Attacking Prosecutorial Misconduct
In October, Michael Morton walked out of a Texas Courtroom after his 1987 murder conviction was overturned because of new DNA evidence pointing to another man.
In October, Michael Morton walked out of a Texas Courtroom after his 1987 murder conviction was overturned because of new DNA evidence pointing to another man.
The Yolo County District Attorney’s office has just spent three and a half years and unknown quantities of money to get the death penalty in what should have been a slam dunk case.
Deputy District Attorney Sulaiman Tokhi argued that this is a case where “bad liars meet good evidence.” During these troubled economic times, crimes involving the stealing of metal pipes such as copper and turning them into recycling centers have increased in numbers.
Eight years ago in Colorado, authorities showed up at the home of Tom Mink with a warrant to search for evidence of “criminal libel.” Mr. Mink had developed a satiric internet publication, The Howling Pig. Mr. Mink, then a University of Northern Colorado student, was being prosecuted for libel for what he claimed were protected First Amendment satirical writings.
Five young codefendants were facing nearly 20 years in prison for an attack on January 24, 2011. The co-defendants, four of whom were minors, faced charges of robbery, assault and gang enhancements.
In the recent multi-defendant case in which five youngsters were alleged to have jumped, assaulted and robbed an individual, the Yolo County District Attorney aggressively pursued gang charges despite very thin evidence of gang involvement for the youths.
I’d like to be able to tell you that, in the end, justice was served, a murderer got what he deserved and we are all better off for it. To wearily quote Bob Dylan, “In the courtroom of honor, the judge pounded his gavel – to show that all’s equal and that the courts are on the level – and that the strings in the books ain’t pulled and persuaded…”
When Judge Richardson dismissed Juror No.11 on Monday morning, granting her request for dismissal based on what she claimed to be a language barrier, it created several red flags for the Vanguard, which questioned why she seemed able to understand sufficient English to render a guilty verdict, but not enough to participate in the deliberation on the penalty phase.
On Monday morning, after a brief inquiry with Juror No.11, the judge granted her request for dismissal based on what she claimed to be a language barrier. Left unanswered by the judge and unquestioned by the defense is how she could understand enough English to render a guilty verdict, but not enough to participate in the deliberation on the penalty phase.
On November 3, 2011, 285 people packed the Yolo Judicial Watch Fundraiser and Awards Ceremony to listen to a night about wrongful convictions highlighted by Maurice Caldwell, an individual who spent 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit, and Linda Starr from the Innocence Project, one of the attorneys that helped to free him.
It was not supposed to happen this way. But a juror’s shocking request to be removed from the penalty phase of the Topete trial has thrown a monkey wrench into the system.
As we await the jury’s verdict, I will save you the suspense, this case has been over for a long time, and during District Attorney Jeff Reisig’s brilliant closing, he buried Marco Topete.