Commentary: If Sheriff Has Nothing To Hide, Then Show Us Your Report

Requests for a disclosure of the full investigation have resulted in both claims of privilege and claims that it is an ongoing investigation. When the DA wants to release information from ongoing investigations they do so. They released a statement of probable cause and the coroner’s report within a week of the shooting. Why? Because they believe it showed justification from the shooting.

There was an interesting op-ed in the Woodland Daily Democrat this week written by Judge David Rosenberg and Jim Perry, who is the Court Executive Officer.
In last week’s
The Yolo County Grand Jury is extending its deadline to look for applicants to the Grand Jury Pool. The Grand Jury plays a crucial role both in determining who gets indicted for crimes and also in terms of investigating local agencies for possible wrong doing.
In a county where many complain about disparate treatment in the Criminal Justice System between people who are white and of privilege and those who are minorities, the 8 month sentence that Brett Pedroia received for performing multiple sex acts with a minor has stuck out for quite some time.

Last August, the Vanguard reported that Yolo County District Attorney’s Office Investigator Randy Skaggs had filed suit against Yolo County and the District Attorney’s Office for among other things a violation of right to privacy and whistle-blower retaliation.
Last November, the Yolo County District Attorney’s office released their report on the Shooting of Luis Gutierrez Navarro by Yolo County Sheriff’s Deputies. That report concluded, “When considering all of the facts and circumstances known to them at the time, the use of deadly force by the deputies was objectively reasonable and justified and therefore does not warrant the filing of criminal charges against Sgt. Johnson, Deputy Oviedo or Deputy Bautista.”
Good piece by Marcos Breton this morning in the 
The challenge to the Gang Injunction was originally to begin today (March 9), however last week, Judge David Reed suddenly recused himself citing a number of cases that he was involved in as a defense attorney that the District Attorney’s Office intends to use. That move was likely a ploy by the District Attorney’s Office to remove Judge Reed who seemed to view their case more unfavorably than others.