On Wednesday the Vanguard ran the story, “Media Bias in Local Court Coverage” which described how the District Attorney’s Office effectively gets to write their own stories. To illustrate the point, we ran the DA’s Press Release side-by-side with the Woodland Daily Democrat’s article covering the same story.
The article went on to point out several inaccuracies or omissions that the Daily Democrat reprinted without fact-checking. From our standpoint this is a problem as the public receives a very slanted view of what actually transpired and there is no effective media check against the DA’s PR campaign.
There is a good article this morning in the Woodland Daily Democrat on the problems that the Yolo County Counsel’s Office had with responding to public records requests.
Earlier this year, I had made a request for information from the County Counsel’s office, it took several months and every so often I would send Assistant County Counsel Dan Cederborg an email asking for an update on the status. He stopped responding, did not return my calls, etc. After awhile, I finally asked Supervisor Matt Rexroad to intercede, he made some calls and within a few days I got exactly what I was asking for.
One of the main complaints about the charging of cases by the District Attorney’s Office in Yolo County is that the DA overuses the gang enhancement charge. There are times when we believe non-gang members or questionably gang members are given extended sentences or charges by the DA’s office. But there is another interesting set of cases, where the individuals are actually gang members, they commit a crime, but the crime should not be enhanced with a gang enhancement.
In March of 2009, the victim was walking to the store when he ran across a friend along with Angel Sanchez. The victim did not know Mr. Sanchez prior to this date but was introduced by their mutual friend. Together they walked back to Mr. Sanchez’s apartment and decided to start drinking alcohol. In total there were individuals inside the apartment drinking.
ACLU Sues ICE and Sonoma County Sheriff For Exceeding Local Authority in Immigration-Related Arrests –
While many in the nation including members of our community and adjacent jurisdictions have protested and boycotted Arizona’s immigration law that gives law enforcement the legal ability to racially profile in an effort to identify potential undocumented workers and residents, a lawsuit in the neighboring county of Sonoma is moving forward alleging much of the same activity.
Last week, a federal judge in San Francisco allowed a lawsuit to move forward that charges the unlawful collaboration between the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department and the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to unlawfully target, arrest, and detain Latinos in Sonoma County.
District Attorney’s Office Basically Gets to Write Their Own Stories – Unfiltered and Often Unchecked by Local Media –
As a non-traditional media entity the Vanguard and sites like it, is often criticized for presenting a biased perspective and slanting its news coverage. The Vanguard believes its role is to cover news stories in greater detail, and present alternative and opposing perspectives from the mainstream newspaper.
However, we also take issue with the notion that news covered by traditional media outlets, such as newspapers necessarily represent fair, unbiased, and accurate assessments of what has actually happened. While we believe that individual reporters endeavor for journalistic standards of fairness and balance, the decisions made by editors introduce bias in terms of what gets covered and what does not get covered. But just as important, newspapers given their lack of staffing and resources will often rely on third-party press releases and news accounts from government agencies to be printed, almost verbatim.
En 4 junio, 2010, el juez del tribunal superior del condado de Yolo, Tim Fall, sentenció Anthony Vasquez a 38 años y 8 meses a la cadena en perpetua después de la condenación de un jurado para el robo y el intento de disuadir un testigo.
Según un comunicado del DA, el jurado encontró a Vasquez culpable del robo con el uso intencional de un arma de fuego, la descarga de un arma de fuego que causó gran daño físico, asalto con un arma de fuego que causó gran daño físico y del intento de disuadir un testigo. El jurado también declaró que se cometieron los crímenes en beneficio de una pandilla criminal callejera.
On June 4, 2010, Yolo County Superior Court Judge Tim Fall sentenced 22 year old Anthony Vasquez to 38 years and 8 months to life in state prison after a Yolo County jury convicted him of robbery and attempting to dissuade a witness.
According to a release from the DA, the jury found Vasquez guilty of robbery with intentional use and discharge of a firearm causing great bodily injury, assault with a firearm causing great bodily injury and attempting to dissuade a witness. The jury also found that the crimes were committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang.
En el otoño de 2008, el juez David Rosenberg y el juez Janet Gaard escribieron un op-ed que apareció en ambos el Woodland Daily Democrat y el Davis Enterprise. Fueron oponiéndose la Proposición 5, que fue el Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act (la ley para la rehabilitación de delincuentes no violentos), que se suponía reducir el número de infractores drogodependientes encarcelados.
En este artículo que se enfocó principalmente en los particulares de la proposición, ellos afirman, “Creemos en los tribunales de drogas y la posibilidad verdadera de que los tribunales de drogas pueden ayudar a personas que quieren escaparse de sus adicciones y mejorar sus vidas.”
In the fall of 2008, Judge David Rosenberg and Judge Janet Gaard wrote an op-ed that appeared in both the Woodland Daily Democrat and the Davis Enterprise. In it, they were arguing against Proposition 5, which was the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act, which was supposed to reduce the costs by pushing nonviolent drug offenders away from prison.
In that op-ed that focused mainly on the particulars of the proposition, they argued, “We believe in drug courts and the real possibility that drug courts can help people escape addictions and turn their lives around.”
La primária democrática para la oficina del Abogado General está en sus últimos días, y no hemos tratado la elección en la que hay seis candidatos del partido democrático que quieren ganar la nominación. Una de ellos se llama Kamala Harris, el DA de San Francisco. Srta. Harris se encontraba en una controversia en miércoles cuando el defensor público de San Francisco, Jeff Adachi, la acusó de rehusando de “ entregar los nombres de los agentes de la policía con antecedentes criminales o antecedentes de mal conducto cuyos testimonios han ayudado a condenar acusados a los abogados defensores,” según un informe en el San Francisco Chronicle en jueves.
Kamala Harris discute que su oficina necesita examinar los nombres antes que el defensor público, y que ella necesitaría la permisión del tribunal para dar los nombres de los agentes a los abogados defensores.
We have not given coverage to the Attorney General race that is coming down to its final days for the Democratic Primary, where six democrats are vying for the nomination. One of them is San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris. Ms. Harris found herself in a controversy on Wednesday when San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi accused her of refusing to “turn over to defense lawyers the names of police officers with arrest records or misconduct histories whose trial testimony has helped to convict defendants,” according to a Thursday story in the San Fracisco Chronicle.
Kamala Harris is arguing that her office must first review the names and only after going to court for permission would her office alert defense attorneys to the officers’ problems.
La gran mayoría de acusados en el Condado de Yolo se representan por el defensor público o por un abogado de conflictos (también nombrado por el tribunal). Nuestras investigaciones sugieren una gran disparidad en los recursos disponibles a la defensa pública de los acusados en el Condado de Yolo, siguiendo las tendencias para el estado de California como una totalidad.
Significa que los acusados no se representan bien? Tracy Olson, la defensora pública del condado, dice que no, pero al mismo tiempo la disparidad entre los recursos de la oficina del DA y el defensor público es demasiada grande para ignorar.
The vast majority of criminal defendants in Yolo County are represented through either the public defender’s office or by conflict counsel, also appointed by the court. Our research suggests a vast disparity in the resources available to the public defense of the accused in Yolo County following trends for the state overall.
Does that mean that defends are not being well-represented? Tracie Olson, the County’s Public Defender, says no, but at the same time the resource gap between the District Attorney’s Office and public defense is perhaps too large to ignore.
It began as a very simply comment that Matt Rexroad has likely done thousands of times, he updated his Facebook status as he would sometimes update his blog, rexroad.com, with a comment about the political world. And for those that believe that Matt Rexroad is nothing more than a cut and dried Conservative Republican, the Matt Rexroad I have gotten to know over the last four years has a considerable amount of gray.
So when I saw his Facebook status, as he is indeed a “Facebook friend,” I laughed and thought nothing of it, it was Matt Rexroad being Matt Rexroad. He wrote, “Matt Rexroad understands that it works with Republican voters… but if Sarah Palin endorsed me I would be too embarrassed to tell anyone.”
Para cualquiera razón, decidí comentar en un artículo en el Woodland Journal que hizo una reclamación sobre la Coalición de la Justicia del Condado de Yolo. El artículo mismo no se interesa mucho, pero uno de los moderadores del sitio, Dino Gay, hizo algunas afirmaciones que llamó hechos.
“Navarro fue Sureño. Fue drogado. Tuvo un cuchillo. Sacó el cuchillo ante un agente de la policía. Otra vez, todos hechos.”
For some reason I decided to weigh in on a post on the Woodland Journal that made a claim about the Yolo County Justice Coalition. The post itself was not really that interesting, but one of the moderators over there, Dino Gay, then made assertions about the Gutierrez case that he called facts.
“Navarro was a Sureño. He was high. He had a knife. He pulled the knife on an officer. Again, all facts.”
Un proceso comienza hoy día para Loren Poirier, 42, acusado en casos distintos del vandalismo. Sr. Poirier tiene una historia personal del trastorno bipolar, y hay preguntas serias sobre su competencia para ser enjuiciado y también sobre su estado de mente cuando se cometen los crímenes.
No obstante, el DA del Condado de Yolo, en una inversión del juicio del ADA James Walker, quien fue asignado originalmente a este caso, se lo persigue como un caso de “3 strikes” y quiere encarcelar a Sr. Poirier para el resto de su vida.
A trial begins today for Loren Poirier, 42, accused in separate cases of vandalism. Mr. Poirier has a history of serious mental illness, diagnosed as Bipolar Disorder, and there are serious questions both about his competency to stand trial as well as his state of mind at the time in which the crimes were committed.
Nevertheless, the Yolo County DA’s office, apparently overruling the judgment of Deputy District Attorney James Walker, who was assigned to this case, is pursuing this as a three strikes case and seeking to put Mr. Poirier in prison for life.
On Monday we learned that Raley’s has agreed to pay a settlement of $550,000 to resolve a case brought by the District Attorney’s offices in six counties including Yolo County, for illegal practices in handling workers’ compensation claims brought forward by injured workers.
The settlement was announced on Monday by the district attorneys from Yolo, Sacramento, Placer, San Joaquin, Amador, and Monterey counties. Yolo County DA’s office will receive $100,000 as part of the settlement.
Mark Merin, local defense attorney, will ask “Should Freedom Have a Curfew?” as he reviews the current West Sacramento ‘gang injunction’ at the annual meeting the Yolo Chapter of the Northern California ACLU on May 27, 6:30-9pm at the Davis United Methodist Church fellowship hall, 1620 Anderson Road in Davis. The meeting is free. All county ACLU members are invited, and the public is welcome.
After a potluck meal and election of new Yolo board members for 2010-11, special guest Abdi Soltani, Executive Director of NorCalACLU will provide a brief update of current ACLU activities, followed by Merin’s presentation.