Commentary: Looking Closer at Public Statements on the Tsakopoulos Development

County Supervisor Mariko Yamada is finding herself in some hot water for her role in holding discussions with Developer Angelo Tsakopoulos on a project that would create a stem cell facility but also build on roughly 2800 acres of land between Davis and the Vic Fazio Yolo Wildlife Area. This would include a commercial development and also somewhere in the order of 7500 units of housing.

In addition to Supervisor Yamada’s response in the Vanguard last week, she has now appeared in three separate publications–the Sacramento Bee, the Davis Enterprise, and most recently the Sacramento News and Review.

Here she is in her own quoted words.

Sacramento Bee, June 28, 2007:

“We are in the 21st century, and we need to keep an open mind about how we are going to approach land use and the I-80 corridor from the Bay Area to Sacramento.”

“There are already so many research organizations along the I-80 corridor. That’s why it’s called the Innovation Corridor. Yolo County should not be the only county that’s not in the conversation.”

Davis Enterprise, June 28, 2007:

“I’ve been approached; it’s in my district.”

“We’re looking at all aspects of this proposal… And the university is in discussions too. It’s all part of the county’s General Plan update process.”

“It’s part of the new direction the county is going in.”

Sacramento News and Review, July 5, 2007:

Attending one of the Tsakopoulos-hosted private dinners were Yolo County supervisors Mike McGowan and Mariko Yamada, both of whom were quoted in the Bee article as positively inclined toward considering some type of research center in a stretch of the I-80 corridor. But Yamada told SN&R that there was no mention made of any housing development. “No, I heard nothing proposed about housing development at that dinner,” Yamada says.

Yamada told SN&R that she would not support any housing development there, as the land sits unprotected in the Yolo Basin flood plain.

Yamada, who is chairwoman of the county board, already has emerged as the target of criticism on a community Web site, with accusations that she has moved from being a “slow-growther” to a politician more accommodating to development. While passionately defending her commitment to preserving Yolo County’s farmland and open space as top priority, Yamada is running for the state Assembly seat being vacated next year by Lois Wolk. Campaign professionals suggest she will have to raise at least $500,000 to be competitive with primary opponent Christopher Cabaldon, the mayor of West Sacramento. But, Yamada firmly asserts, “I don’t practice checkbook politics.”

Note that Supervisor Yamada told the News and Review that she would not support a housing development in that location.

As our article on June 29, 2007 made clear, the objection to the project was the idea of building homes on the property (not to mention the location of the stem cell facility on agricultural land).

As I wrote:

“The issue here is not about a stem-cell research center. If Mr. Tsakopoulos wants to build a research center, I would greatly be supportive of it on the UC Davis campus. However, this is basically a means by which to build homes and other development projects on prime agricultural land and that, I cannot support.”

Supervisor Yamada on July 3, 2007, was given space to respond to the Vanguard’s criticism. She chose to emphasize her record on land use while being a county supervisor.

Supervisor Yamada however at that time never came out against the housing development, instead she spoke only of the research facility:

“The idea of a stem cell research facility in Yolo County is conceptual; there is no specific proposal to be considered at this time. At present, I am keeping an open mind about the research, educational, and life-saving potential such a facility might bring to the region.”

It might seem then that Supervisor Yamada is either clarifying her position or backtracking on this. It is hard to say at this point which. However, 1500 of those units is being studied in the general plan as part of the joint study area.

For my part, I will continue to argue that all aspects of this project are inappropriate for consideration by the county. The city of Davis should have land-use authority on the periphery of Davis as the pass-through agreement states. Remember that the pass-through agreement provides $2 million per year to the county in exchange for land-use authority in the city’s “sphere of influence.” The county may be able to generate more than $2 million on individual development agreements, but that is one-time money. There is no way, that over the course of the 25 year pass-through agreement, the county will surpass the revenue that Davis’ Redevelopment Agency passes-through to them.

This discussion along with the County General plan is pushing the city and county on a collision course. If this is not halted, future cooperation is going to be severely altered. Davis elected both Supervisors Mariko Yamada and Helen Thomson to represent the issues, values, and principles of this community. These type of proposals are in conflict with the general hard-fought land use principles that Davis voters elected their representatives on the Board of Supervisors to protect. We can only hope that as this process moves on, that they remember who elected them and who they represent.

—Doug Paul Davis reporting

Author

  • David Greenwald

    Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

    View all posts

Categories:

Land Use/Open Space

252 comments

  1. Today’s Enterprise includes a story about the opening of the new Benicia bridge on I-680, eliminating the traffic bottleneck on that Interstate. The Yolo Causeway is already a significant bottleneck on I-80 east of Davis. It is hard to imagine how much worse it will be if AKT begins building 25,000 homes as proposed.

    I appreciate the fact that Supervisor Yamada wants to take the time to understand all the facets of the Tsakopoulos proposal, but the negatives are so significant that one wonders how long the listening period needs to last before the answer becomes clear to everyone.

    Matt Williams

  2. Today’s Enterprise includes a story about the opening of the new Benicia bridge on I-680, eliminating the traffic bottleneck on that Interstate. The Yolo Causeway is already a significant bottleneck on I-80 east of Davis. It is hard to imagine how much worse it will be if AKT begins building 25,000 homes as proposed.

    I appreciate the fact that Supervisor Yamada wants to take the time to understand all the facets of the Tsakopoulos proposal, but the negatives are so significant that one wonders how long the listening period needs to last before the answer becomes clear to everyone.

    Matt Williams

  3. Today’s Enterprise includes a story about the opening of the new Benicia bridge on I-680, eliminating the traffic bottleneck on that Interstate. The Yolo Causeway is already a significant bottleneck on I-80 east of Davis. It is hard to imagine how much worse it will be if AKT begins building 25,000 homes as proposed.

    I appreciate the fact that Supervisor Yamada wants to take the time to understand all the facets of the Tsakopoulos proposal, but the negatives are so significant that one wonders how long the listening period needs to last before the answer becomes clear to everyone.

    Matt Williams

  4. Today’s Enterprise includes a story about the opening of the new Benicia bridge on I-680, eliminating the traffic bottleneck on that Interstate. The Yolo Causeway is already a significant bottleneck on I-80 east of Davis. It is hard to imagine how much worse it will be if AKT begins building 25,000 homes as proposed.

    I appreciate the fact that Supervisor Yamada wants to take the time to understand all the facets of the Tsakopoulos proposal, but the negatives are so significant that one wonders how long the listening period needs to last before the answer becomes clear to everyone.

    Matt Williams

  5. Calbadon is the candidate of the Yolo political machine that is backrolled by Yolo developers. This is supposed to “buy” exclusive access to the BOS’
    consideration of future growth development plans. If Yamada supports allowing Tskaopoulos to get through the door to present proposals as the Yolo BOS works on its General Plan Update, I wouldn’t get all bent out of shape. Compared to the public record of Yolo developer-backed local politicians like Thomson,Wolk,Saylor and Souza , Mariko Yamada’s record of political integrity makes her the clear choice for the voters of Davis.

  6. Calbadon is the candidate of the Yolo political machine that is backrolled by Yolo developers. This is supposed to “buy” exclusive access to the BOS’
    consideration of future growth development plans. If Yamada supports allowing Tskaopoulos to get through the door to present proposals as the Yolo BOS works on its General Plan Update, I wouldn’t get all bent out of shape. Compared to the public record of Yolo developer-backed local politicians like Thomson,Wolk,Saylor and Souza , Mariko Yamada’s record of political integrity makes her the clear choice for the voters of Davis.

  7. Calbadon is the candidate of the Yolo political machine that is backrolled by Yolo developers. This is supposed to “buy” exclusive access to the BOS’
    consideration of future growth development plans. If Yamada supports allowing Tskaopoulos to get through the door to present proposals as the Yolo BOS works on its General Plan Update, I wouldn’t get all bent out of shape. Compared to the public record of Yolo developer-backed local politicians like Thomson,Wolk,Saylor and Souza , Mariko Yamada’s record of political integrity makes her the clear choice for the voters of Davis.

  8. Calbadon is the candidate of the Yolo political machine that is backrolled by Yolo developers. This is supposed to “buy” exclusive access to the BOS’
    consideration of future growth development plans. If Yamada supports allowing Tskaopoulos to get through the door to present proposals as the Yolo BOS works on its General Plan Update, I wouldn’t get all bent out of shape. Compared to the public record of Yolo developer-backed local politicians like Thomson,Wolk,Saylor and Souza , Mariko Yamada’s record of political integrity makes her the clear choice for the voters of Davis.

  9. Really what is Mariko’s record of “public integrity”?

    She told us that she was a No on Xer and then we find out from the people involved in campaign that she didn’t disclose her opposition until the measure had been soundly defeated.

    She told us that she was opposed to Target but the Target people told us that she had never taken a position.

    What integrity? And how does integrity excuse the fact that she is now proposing that the county look into developing three sites on the Davis periphery?

    For me this is not about Cabaldon v. Mariko. We have Mariko for the next year and half on the BOS when these land use changes will be encoded into law. That is what I’m worried about–preventing those three areas around Davis from having their land use designations changed. My vote for Assembly is irrelevant to that. Once those land use changes are put into place, that is permanent. Then it becomes only a matter of time before the land gets developed.

  10. Really what is Mariko’s record of “public integrity”?

    She told us that she was a No on Xer and then we find out from the people involved in campaign that she didn’t disclose her opposition until the measure had been soundly defeated.

    She told us that she was opposed to Target but the Target people told us that she had never taken a position.

    What integrity? And how does integrity excuse the fact that she is now proposing that the county look into developing three sites on the Davis periphery?

    For me this is not about Cabaldon v. Mariko. We have Mariko for the next year and half on the BOS when these land use changes will be encoded into law. That is what I’m worried about–preventing those three areas around Davis from having their land use designations changed. My vote for Assembly is irrelevant to that. Once those land use changes are put into place, that is permanent. Then it becomes only a matter of time before the land gets developed.