Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.
Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:
Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule
Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:
Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule
Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:
Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule
Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:
Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule
The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.
The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.
The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.
The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.
If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.
However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.
If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.
However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.
If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.
However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.
If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.
However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.
I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!
I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!
I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!
I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!
“I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”
Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.
Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?
“I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”
Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.
Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?
“I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”
Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.
Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?
“I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”
Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.
Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but after eight long years I’m finally ready to vote for “W”.
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but after eight long years I’m finally ready to vote for “W”.
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but after eight long years I’m finally ready to vote for “W”.
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but after eight long years I’m finally ready to vote for “W”.
Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:
http://www.yvm.net/vme/no-on-w
Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule
Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:
http://www.yvm.net/vme/no-on-w
Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule
Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:
http://www.yvm.net/vme/no-on-w
Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule
Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:
http://www.yvm.net/vme/no-on-w
Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule
If you want to read more about Measure W, or volunteer to support the Yes campaign, you can go to
http://www.yesw.org
or contact campaign coordinator, Kingsley Melton at (530)554-2548
If you want to read more about Measure W, or volunteer to support the Yes campaign, you can go to
http://www.yesw.org
or contact campaign coordinator, Kingsley Melton at (530)554-2548
If you want to read more about Measure W, or volunteer to support the Yes campaign, you can go to
http://www.yesw.org
or contact campaign coordinator, Kingsley Melton at (530)554-2548
If you want to read more about Measure W, or volunteer to support the Yes campaign, you can go to
http://www.yesw.org
or contact campaign coordinator, Kingsley Melton at (530)554-2548
The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.
The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.
The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.
The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.
If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.
However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.
If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.
However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.
If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.
However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.
If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.
However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.
With that kind of campaign money, you could pay for half of a teacher for one year.
With that kind of campaign money, you could pay for half of a teacher for one year.
With that kind of campaign money, you could pay for half of a teacher for one year.
With that kind of campaign money, you could pay for half of a teacher for one year.
I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!
I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!
I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!
I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!
“I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”
Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.
Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?
“I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”
Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.
Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?
“I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”
Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.
Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?
“I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”
Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.
Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?
“Perhaps you should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?”
“Perhaps you should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?”
“Perhaps you should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?”
“Perhaps you should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?”