by Antoinnette Borbon
Monday ended the lengthy preliminary hearing of a woman accused of a violation of probation. Judge David Rosenberg held Laura Glover to answer for the three misdemeanor counts. But he not only held her to answer, he remanded her into custody after listening to testimony of two deputies, a security guard, and the defendant herself, talk about the incident that took place in a campsite on May 31, 2013.
The woman was charged with resisting and delaying an officer, corporal punishment on a child, and being under the influence of alcohol while on felony probation. Judge Rosenberg dropped the false information charge.
Earlier last week, two deputies testified to finding a woman highly intoxicated, slurring words, and yelling obscenities at the trailer where she and her five-year-old were camping with a friend. Deputies stated they were summoned to do a welfare check on the child because a witness saw the woman yelling at the child and then slapping her more than a couple times.
The witness, who was a teen staying at the park, called security. As security arrived, he began questioning the little girl but the mother/defendant grabbed her daughter and went inside the recreational vehicle.
The security guard called the sheriff’s office to come out to do a welfare check. They testified that, upon knocking at the door, they found a highly-intoxicated woman who was slurring her words and appeared unstable. They asked if they could talk to the child but the woman told them to leave and she tried to shut the door on them.
The deputies testified to seeing the recreational vehicle in disarray, with stale food and empty alcohol containers. The deputies stated that the little girl appeared frightened and was crying. One of the officers testified to seeing a red mark on the child’s face. Both deputies stated they had identified themselves to the woman.
However, they testified that the woman refused to talk with the deputies, and once she did talk, she gave incorrect information and then tried to flee, attempting to headbutt an officer and resisting the officer.
The deputies caught her and placed her under arrest as the young girl watched. As they were taking her away, the woman yelled to her child, “This is your fault, look what you’ve done,” along with other profanities.
Defense Attorney Kitay put the defendant on the stand to testify. Once she was on the stand, he began asking her what happened that afternoon. She stated that she and a friend and their children split the cost to go on a camping trip. The defendant stated they took her friend’s boat and she had been water skiing early in the morning with her daughter.
She told the court she had had only two beers the whole day, the last one being right before she had lain down to take a nap. She stated she had asked her daughter to take out the trash but instead her daughter threw it on the floor, so she slapped her.
She said it was a light slap. But she never mentioned using any profanity. She stated this incident took place after she got back from the boat, around 1:30 pm. Sometime after she slapped her daughter, she found her daughter outside talking to a security guard. She grabbed her and went inside to take a nap in the recreational vehicle.
She said she was awakened by a loud knock. She went to answer the door and it was two uniformed men, who she thought were security guards. She stated, “I never heard them announce they were cops, I thought they were just security guards and do not recall seeing a duty belt or a sheriff’s badge.” She described them as being dressed in camouflage attire, with nothing indicating they were law enforcement.
She said she was scared and tried to shut the door and go back to sleep but one of the officers stopped her from shutting the door. She stated they saw the child was okay and should have just left, but they didn’t. She said she could not recall what they told her as to why they were there, but then she recalled they told her they were there to do a welfare check.
But in cross-examination, Deputy District Attorney Deanna Hays began with questions about the defendant’s drinking problems. Ms. Hays asked her about her past drinking problems. She asked the defendant how many beers she had to drink that day. The defendant kept saying only two. Ms. Hays asked her about being on probation and what it was for.
It was then that the defendant when into a rant about her past, stating, as she turned and faced Judge Rosenberg, “Okay, so here it is, yes, I have been an alcoholic but like the big book says, sometimes you go back to drinking one last time, and look at this, here I am, so I guess I drank out of impunity, your honor.”
Judge Rosenberg allowed her to answer.
As each question came at the defendant, she would answer it one way and then ask Ms. Hays to repeat the question, only to change her answer.
Ms. Hays asked her more than once if she saw a tag on the uniform that said “Sheriff.” She replied “I really do not recall.” The defendant was asked about the slap to her daughter’s face and why the defendant slapped her.
The defendant told Ms. Hays the same story about her daughter not taking the trash out. Ms. Hays asked her if she remembered yelling at the deputies, and resisting and delaying them when they tried to take her into custody, but she did not recall. Ms. Hays asked the defendant about the incorrect information given to police, but she stated once again, “I do not recall.”
In argument, the defense would state the laws permitting a welfare check. He stated case law which says there must be an immediate threat to a person. He sayid this was not such a situation. He then went on to state there was no evidence of corporal punishment on a child and that it was not a public place but the defendant’s place of residence, at the time while camping, and she had the right to drink.
DDA Hays came back with a strong argument stating the child suffered mental and emotional injury and that is within the scope of the corporal punishment laws. She reiterated what the defendant yelled at her little girl as she was being arrested and told the court this was emotional injury.
Ms. Hays stated there was evidence of a slap from the teen who witnessed it happening outside the recreational vehicle. She stated the defendant was belligerent and resisted, and delayed the deputies, using profanity that day. She asked the judge to hold her on charges.
Judge Rosenberg stated he felt the two deputies and the security guard’s testimony were honest but that the defendant’s was not, as she changed her answers several times when asked the same questions. He stated that there was enough evidence to prove the allegations and stated the defendant is a danger to the little girl and to others while under the influence.
But it was not the usual continuance of the case with an arraignment. Instead, Judge Rosenberg told the bailiffs to remand her into custody. He stated he felt she was dangerous and needed to be detained.
The defense attorney fought to keep her out, claiming his client had a business and needed to get some affairs in order before going into jail, but Judge Rosenberg denied his request.
The next court date for the defendant will be November 4, 2013, in Department 4.
Thanks for the clear reporting Antoinette.
This is an example, although a mild one, of the kind of circumstances I encountered that caused me to leave the Child Protective Services evaluation team many years ago.
In my opinion Judge Rosenberg got this one exactly right. While the mother clearly has the disease of alcohol addiction driving her behaviors, and might be a wonderful mother when not under the influence. The situation, as presented, is clearly a dangerous one for a 5 year old. In instances such as this, I am a strong believer in Family Reunification only when the parent has completed an appropriate detox and rehab program and demonstrated the ability to remain sober for an extended period of time. What may be down played as “only a slap” by the defense, can easily escalate to a life threatening circumstance when the individual under the influence of alcohol or other drugs loses their temper and control of their actions.
If she was on probation for something alcohol related this would make even more sense.
Judge Rosenberg was the Drug Court Judge for a few years. I think he learned to spot the lies and excuses of addicts during that time. I believe he acted in the best interest of the child and the mother.
Thank you medwoman….I think David’s cracking of the whip on our writing styles seems to have set in…lol…
Yes, I totally agree with Rosenberg, as there were also knives lying around the trailor too that the little girl could have been hurt with while her mother out of it under the influence. I also agree, a slap is more than just a slap, along with ugly words, this is a situation already, that has made this poor child emotionally injured. Bruises heal but words never do as much…
Judge Rosenberg was not impressed with her words and read this one right. I think for me, the hardest part in listening to her testimony is she had absolutely no remorse for what she had done to the child. She only ranted on about herself, her life and lied about so many things to Ms. Hays. I was very impressed by DDA and her ability to ferret out the truth in this case. She never backed down and this is the kind of counsel we need to stop any kind of abuse/crime from repeating. I commend Rosenberg also…sure he has seen this time and time again.
I hope she gets the help she needs but more so, can understand the depth of her actions. I pray for this little innocent child’s heart and for those who attend to her now.
Thanks for reading!
Kindly, Antoinnette
interesting that you wrote this the day after david’s commentary on the family court system. i honestly believe that little would still have been alive if judge mcadam were as proactive as judge rosenberg.
Oh my word. That poor little girl. What ripped my heart out was thinking of the horror that child experienced as her mother blamed HER for the arrest. Horrible.
[quote] attempting to headbutt an officer[/quote] I can’t imaging having the instinct to use my own head as a physical weapon. Just wow.
@Davis progressive….yes, I agree! But you just never know when you are going to make a bad call..it is a risk they take. But I am happy he could spot a spade when he saw one. I personally thank him.
The interesting thing is this; only half of what really goes on in these cases is seen in court, maybe a bit more, but the truth is only law enforcement has to see it all and hopefully write a correct/honest report. One that would help the judges/jury make better decisions from reading and hearing all the evidence.
I know our own YONET division gets to see first hand the way innocent children are kept in a household, endangered by drugs, guns, filthy environments and poison chemicals,all to often. Not to mention the parents being under the influence of drugs/alcohol and the actions that stem from that influence; i.e. abuse, neglect.
We only get to see the defendant/defendants after they are cleaned up, sober and sometimes remorseful. By then, sometimes it is too late, the child/children are hurt in one way or another.
Parenting is tough enough without adding addiction to the equation. Living sober is commanded for a reason.
@Ginger…yes, hard to picture a woman doing this but good ol alcohol/drugs do tend to make one lose all inhibitions. She is lucky she did not get hurt herself. Yes, blaming her little one was about the ugliest thing she did alongside sitting on the stand lacking any remorse for what she had done to her child. Very hard to hear..