![](https://davisvanguard.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Bail-765x510.jpg)
In California, bail insurance corporations’ impact and influence is exposed as the Legislature considers reforms to the state’s unjust and costly money bail system
(From press release) – On Thursday, Color Of Change and the American Civil Liberties Union ’s Campaign for Smart Justice released a scathing national report exposing insurance corporations’ hand in creating an unnecessary and largely unaccountable $2 billion bail industry. The report, “Selling Off Our Freedom: How Insurance Corporations Have Taken Over Our Bail System,” outlines the insurance industry’s role in a money bail system that ensnares thousands of people in detention or debt – or both – as well as the industry’s significant impact and influence in California.
“We all want a justice system that works for everyone,” said Margaret Dooley-Sammuli, Criminal Justice and Drug Policy Director of the ACLU of California. “Sadly, the current money bail system puts bail insurance corporations’ profits before justice. These conglomerates reap tremendous benefits at low risk, while trapping people in debt and evading oversight. This is not a system of justice. It is a system of corporate greed.”
The bail bonds industry portrays itself as small, “mom and pop” bail bonds agencies that secure release from jail for a nonrefundable fee – typically 10 percent of the bail amount paid in cash or through an installment plan with interest. In reality, multinational insurance corporations dominate the industry, underwriting each bond. The money bail system allows corporate insurers to operate with little risk, meaning the industry profits even when its customers do not show up for court. The report reveals that bail insurance corporations are increasingly held as under-the-radar subsidiaries of large multinational companies, and fewer than 10 large insurers underwrite a majority of the approximately $14 billion in bail bonds issued in the United States each year.
“Big insurance is raking in huge profits by putting a price on people’s freedom,” said Rashad Robinson, executive director of Color Of Change. “Bail bonds are the new payday loans. It’s a predatory practice that traps Black families and poor people in debt. For too long, the corporations that reap massive profits from this unjust destruction of our communities have been allowed to operate unchecked. When taxpayers foot the bill for needlessly locking up poor people before trial, the government is essentially subsidizing a racist, unnecessary, and outright dangerous industry. This report makes it clear: our justice system cannot be fair until we end for-profit bail.”
The report found:
- The for-profit bail industry rigs contracts to coerce people in dire circumstances to forfeit their rights, such as forcing customers and families to submit to invasive surveillance, and to pay long-term and unpredictable costs;
- The for-profit bail industry traps families in cycle of debt through payment plans for bond deposits, which people can end up paying long after their case is dismissed or resolved;
- In just 5 months of 2016, nearly 200 people in San Joaquin County, California paid for-profit bail companies to be freed from jail where no case was even filed and the charges were dropped;
- In California, complaints about for-profit bail to the California Department of Insurance nearly quadrupled between 2010 and 2015. Common complaints included scams, misrepresentation, extortion and kidnapping, bribery, perjury, theft, and fraud;
- In California, the for-profit bail industry contributed nearly $300,000 to state-level candidates, committees, parties, or ballot measures in the 2010 through 2016 election cycles.
Every year, California’s money bail system keeps thousands of people in jail before they get their day in court – all because they cannot afford to post bail and buy their freedom. Others are able to pool resources together, often with the help of family members, to pay the nonrefundable 10% fee.
San Diego resident and small business owner Melodie Henderson was among many Californians that the for-profit bail industry drove into life-altering debt. Eleven years ago, she was arrested and had her bail set to $50,000. Unable to afford the whole amount, she and her grandparents went through a bail bonds company to secure her release as her case moved forward. She spent years trying to pay back the bail bonds company, during which time she postponed school, got behind on other bills, and severely damaged her credit.
“The burden that I had placed on my family was worst of all,” said Melodie Henderson. “Watching my grandmother write checks to the bail company for me broke my heart.”
Fortunately, the California legislature is considering two identical bills AB 42 (Bonta) and SB 10 (Hertzberg), that will truly protect the wellbeing and safety of communities. Specifically, the bills will reduce the number of people locked up because they are unable to pay to get out of jail while their cases move forward. They will also prioritize services to help people make their court appearances and curb the state’s overreliance on the current money bail system. The bills build upon commonsense solutions adopted in other localities that have significantly reduced their use of commercial bail, such as Kentucky, Santa Clara, California, and Washington, D.C.
The full report is available online here: https://www.aclu.org/sellingfreedom.
It’s a very difficult question. Bail makes not sense at all. However I don’t trust either Color Of Change or the American Civil Liberties Union to devise a system that looks out for my interests.
There are some existing alternatives including one in Washington DC that holds some promise
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/when-it-comes-to-pretrial-release-few-other-jurisdictions-do-it-dcs-way/2016/07/04/8eb52134-e7d3-11e5-b0fd-073d5930a7b7_story.html?utm_term=.e77b94615817
I had this out with your friend Mr. Dunning in the Enterprise about the Mosque Baconer.
I would be much more interested in what the counter proposal is than in what is currently wrong. I remember reading the DC thing previously and was not impressed though I cannot remember why.