Six months after revelations about the detention of a young Honduran boy rocked Yolo County, a lawsuit was filed last week against a large number of agencies, starting with Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and going down as far as Yolo County Chief Probation Officer Brent Cardall. The suit claims the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) was using unsubstantiated claims of gang affiliation to illegally detain teenagers in jail-like facilities in Woodland.
The lead plaintiffs in this case lived in Suffolk County, New York, where two weeks ago President Trump gave a speech endorsing police brutality against people suspected of gang violence.
The suit charges ORR with accepting ICE’s unsubstantiated gang allegations and placing children in severely restrictive conditions, even though the government had previously released the youth to the custody of their parents.
The plaintiffs were transported to distant detention facilities without notice to their parents or lawyers and were not afforded a chance to challenge the charges against them.
According to the suit, “AH” is a 17-year-old unaccompanied immigrant child and a citizen of Honduras.
Until June of 2017, he resided with his mother on Long Island, but was then arrested by ICE and transported by the defendants to a secure detention facility in Woodland.
He remained at Woodland in the custody of ORR until he was transferred by ORR to a staff secure facility in Dobbs Ferry, NY.
However, “he remains subject to being transferred back to Yolo or another secure or staff secure facility in Northern California at any time. As such, he is in custody under color of the authority 
of the United States, and he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2241.”
Then there is “FE,” a 17-year-old unaccompanied immigrant child and a citizen of El Salvador.
Until June 9, 2017, he resided with his mother and stepfather on Long Island, but was then arrested by the Suffolk County Police Department, released on June 14, 2016, re-arrested by SCPD on June 16, 2017, and turned over to ICE.
Defendants then transported him to a secure detention facility in Shenandoah, Virginia, in the custody of ORR.
ORR then transferred him to an ORR contract facility in Fairfield, California, and then to another ORR contract facility in Lincolndale, New York.
However, “he remains subject to being transferred back to Yolo or another secure or staff secure facility in Northern California at any time. As such, he is in custody under color of the authority of the United States, and he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2241.”
Defendant Jefferson B. Sessions III is the Attorney General of the United States, ”responsible for the enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws. He is sued solely in his official capacity.”
There are nine other defendants in this case, including Brent Cardall of the Yolo County Probation Office and Jose Esquivel of the BCFS Health and Human Services in Fairfield.
According to the suit, Mr. Cardall is sued: “Upon information and belief, he is responsible for providing care and custody to unaccompanied minor children through a contract with ORR. He is sued solely in his official capacity.”
Mr. Esquivel is sued because “he is responsible for providing care and custody to unaccompanied minor children through a contract with ORR.”
The ACLU put out a press release on August 11.
“We’re talking about teens who were picked up for play-fighting with a friend, or for showing pride in their home country of El Salvador,” said Stephen Kang, attorney with the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project. “The Office of Refugee Resettlement is accepting wholesale that young immigrants should be kept behind bars because of what they look like or where they come from.”
The lawsuit charges that federal authorities – under the guise of a “crackdown” on transnational street gangs – are embarking on a concerted effort to detain and deport children based on unreliable claims of gang affiliation and flawed reports of criminal history.
“The police and immigration agents are arresting kids because they think they look like gang members, but youth are the future of this country and they have a lot to offer,” said “JG,” a 17-year-old plaintiff. “Don’t judge people by their appearance.”
FE, the juvenile plaintiff described above, reports that he’s been frequently stopped by Suffolk County Police (SCPD) starting in the spring of 2017. His request to meet with the police department to introduce himself and address the harassment was rebuffed. On June 9, this teenage boy was walking home from a soccer game and “play-fighting” with a friend when SCPD officers arrested him for disorderly conduct. He was released five days later, and then rearrested two days later by local police officers who told FE he was being arrested to be turned over to immigration authorities for deportation. He has been held in ORR detention ever since due to ICE’s unsupported allegations of “gang affiliation.”
The SCPD – which has acknowledged that it uses ICE to detain teens the SCPD doesn’t have the evidence to arrest – was investigated by the Department of Justice in 2009 for discriminatory policing against Latino community members. Due to this investigation and its findings, the SCPD is currently a party to an agreement that requires the department to implement “significant changes in how it engages the Latino community.” The named juvenile plaintiffs, all of whom are Latino, report being watched, targeted, and profiled by local law enforcement.
“The government rightly reunited these kids with their families years ago,” said William S. Freeman, senior staff attorney for the ACLU of Northern California. “They have dreams and legal claims to remain in the United States, but they’ve been swept up by an administration that prioritizes deportations over truth and justice.”
ORR is legally required to ensure that a child who immigrated to the U.S. alone is placed under the care of a family member or sponsor in the U.S. or, alternately, in the least restrictive setting possible. The suit alleges that ICE and ORR are violating this requirement by re-arresting children who have already been processed and released to sponsors by ORR, and then placing them in prison-like facilities.
“This case centers on the denial of fundamental protections that are at the core of our legal system, and that apply to everyone, regardless of immigration status,” said Martin Schenker, a partner at Cooley, LLP. “Children are being denied access to their family and legal counsel and incarcerated in remote locations based on unreliable and unsubstantiated allegations, which amounts to a wholly unacceptable breach of their statutory and constitutional rights.”
The class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The plaintiffs seek to be returned to their parents’ custody, and request a declaration that the government has violated their rights under the Constitution, federal immigration law, and a 1995 consent decree that sets national standards for the treatment of immigrant children. The lawsuit also seeks an injunction to block the government from arresting and detaining immigrant children without cause.
This complaint amends a complaint that was originally filed on June 22 on behalf of one juvenile plaintiff from Suffolk County and his mother.
—David M. Greenwald reporting
