By Joseph Cohen
In the early hours of May 6, 2016, the lives of rookie police officer Stephen Mader and R.J. Williams intersected in Weirton, West Virginia. Both men were young fathers. Mader was a white cop holding a gun. Williams was a Black man holding a gun. This tragedy ends exactly as you’d expect — with R.J. Williams killed by a police bullet — but with a twist: Mader did not kill him. In fact, he tried his best to save Williams’ life. And for doing his duty, Mader was fired.
Today we can announce a resolution of the case in favor of a police officer who chose not to shoot a Black man.
To settle all outstanding claims, the City of Weirton will pay Mader $175,000. And while justice prevailed for Mader, R.J. Williams is still dead — a constant reminder police nationwide need the proper de-escalation training needed to avoid unnecessary killings, especially of Black men and boys.
In the case of the death at the hands of police of R.J. Williams, it all started with a domestic disturbance call by Williams’ girlfriend. Arriving first on the scene, Mader came upon Williams, who had his hands behind his back. The officer quickly asked Williams to show him his hands. Williams complied, revealing a gun. Immediately, Mader ordered Williams to drop his weapon. But Williams refused, (asking) repeatedly for Mader to “just shoot me.”
In that moment, Mader did not see a man with a gun. He saw a human being in crisis. Mader deduced that Williams was not what he might appear — a danger to others and to a responding officer alike. 
Mader saw that Williams was trying to commit “suicide by cop.”
Rather than shoot, Mader returned to his military training and attempted to de-escalate the situation. He softened his voice, looked Williams in the eye, and said, “I’m not going to shoot you, brother. I’m not going to shoot you.” With those words, Officer Mader connected to the humanity of Williams, a man in deep distress.
While Mader continued his attempt to convince Williams to drop his weapon, two other officers arrived on the scene. In a matter of seconds, one of the newly arrived officers fired four shots, killing Williams. It was at that point the officers discovered that Williams’ gun was unloaded. Stephen Mader was correct. R.J. Williams was not a threat, but it didn’t matter. He was dead.
Weeks later, the Weirton Police Department fired Stephen Mader.
We have grown accustomed to hearing about outrageous acts of violence perpetrated by the police against communities of color. Some become more outraged. Some have become numb. Some call for accountability or for the needed reforms to stop unnecessary police violence and deadly use of force. No matter the public’s reaction, in nearly every instance, the offending cops are not prosecuted and are back patrolling the streets in a few weeks.
But in Weirton, West Virginia, there is the bizarre opposite. Officer Mader was fired for not shooting a Black man with a gun. The message the police department sent is tragically clear: Law enforcement in Weirton should err on the side of killing people.
Under the Fourth Amendment, police officers may only use deadly force if they have probable cause to believe that the target is a violent imminent threat to the officer or someone else. Officer Mader came to the opposite conclusion — he reasonably, objectively, and correctly determined that R.J. Williams was not a threat to anyone except maybe to himself. And once he made that determination, Mader was not permitted to use deadly force under the U.S. Constitution.
Essentially, the Weirton Police Department fired Stephen Mader for failing to violate R.J. Williams’ Fourth Amendment right to not get shot.
A police officer cannot lawfully be fired for failing to violate someone’s constitutional rights. So this past May, along with the Law Offices of Timothy O’Brien, we filed a lawsuit against the City of Weirton on behalf of Mader. We argued, in part, that the termination of Stephen Mader was in violation of West Virginia public policy.
Mader’s firing exposed, again, the toxic culture that infects far too many police departments in America. We need to end the insularity and hostility towards the community exhibited by so many law enforcement agencies. We need to give law enforcement officers tools to effectively serve their communities. That means we need to invest in de-escalation training, implicit bias training, and crisis intervention training. The resolution of this lawsuit sends a clear message to the City of Weirton and to police departments across the country. Our communities deserve thoughtful, compassionate, transparent law enforcement.
Joseph Cohen is the Executive Director of ACLU of West Virginia
“the City of Weirton will pay Mader $175,000. And while justice prevailed for Mader,”
I wonder if “justice” did prevail for anyone in this case. Is Mader now gainfully employed, either as a police officer or in another capacity of his choosing. Or are we merely assigning dollar value to disruption of many lives ( the man who was shot, his girlfriend, any other family members, Officer Mader and his family) and calling it even ? What “justice” was provided for all of the other individuals involved in this case including the officer erroneously fired, when de escalation was objectively warranted ? A fundamental problem I see is the willingness to plaster a monetary value on the disruption of life(s) and call it “justice”.
“Is Mader now gainfully employed”
Yes, according to The Independant (UK) he’s employed as a truck driver. Don’t know if by choice or necessity. He will never again be employed as a police officer in the US. The cop mentality says that he failed to support his fellow officers by not shooting Mr. Williams.
The city said in a statement that the decision to settle was made by its insurance provider and that it stood by its decision to fire Mr Mader
” What “justice” was provided for all of the other individuals involved in this case”
As much as is humanly possible, I’m afraid. Like you, I find it disgusting to put a monetary value on a human life. Mr. Mader says he’s happy to put it all behind him. The trigger happy cop who murdered Mr. Williams will never suffer any consequences for his heinous action. Mr. Williams will never be restored to his family and cops will go on killing civilians.
“As much as is humanly possible”
It is this part that I am unsure of. I can think of a number of things that might have led to a more humane, if not ” just” outcome. Some may have been done, others probably not. My short list would include:
1. Was everyone involved in the entire process from 911 call, to dispatcher, to all of the officers involved debriefed simultaneously? Did any of the respondents actually speak with the 911 caller who might have been able to provide insight?
2. Were any or all of the officers involved offered job retraining ? Any or all offered city provided psychologic evaluation/counseling ?
3. Was the girlfriend and/or any family members of the deceased offered grief/psychologic training ? Is she being offered any compensation from the city? If not, I am wondering about a wrongful death suit since the city settled with the non shooting officer.
1. Of course not. The officer who shot and any other collaborators were “debriefed” as soon as the incident was over by internal affairs shooting team to make sure that they had their story straight, but beyond that, everyone performed as expected, so no need from the PD’s point of view.
2.With the exception of Mader, they all performed as expected , so why would they be retrained?
3.No, she was probably considered another perpetrator by the police. There is currently no record of any wrongful death claim.