SF DA Boudin Cites Expanding Victim Services, Recall Committee Attacks via Twitter

San Francisco DA Chesa Boudin

By Lovepreet Dhinsa

SAN FRANCISCO – San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin—after citing expanding victim services in the city—was attacked again by Recall Committee spokesperson, Richie Greenberg, via Twitter.

From an article in the Washington Post, Boudin tweeted on March 16: “Despite drastic increases in criminal justice expenditures, most survivors of violence and crime still do not receive help from the justice system.”

The Washington Post article was in response to the recent increases in criminal justice expenditures, which were majorly dedicated toward incarceration.

Despite these increased expenditures, statistics indicate that crime victims actually never agreed to this and “fewer than one in three victims reported receiving any help from the justice system.”

The article also noted that over 60 percent of victims supported an improved approach to public safety rooted in prevention and treatment rather than incarceration.

The article also mentioned that people of color were disproportionately represented in these criminal justice systems, in which they were “blamed…for their experiences.”

Boudin followed his tweet with, “in @SFDAOffice we are expanding victim services and centering victims in the criminal justice system.”

But Greenberg, spokesperson for the Recall Committee, took to the same social media platform yesterday to attack Boudin’s tweet about his office’s work about victim work.

According to Greenberg, Chesa Boudin “attack[s] our beloved San Francisco as a whole.”

Greenberg took this claim further by accusing the district attorney of “inciting contempt for the young, the elderly, gay, straight, White, Latinx, African-American, Asian, Jewish, immigrant and local-born, single and married, new parents and grandparents, victims of crime, those with disabilities, women and men alike.”

Greenberg mentioned his distaste against Boudin’s appointment of the chairman of the Democrat Party in San Francisco, David Campos, as his chief of staff, in which Greenberg insinuated how “highly-politicized” Boudin’s office was.

David Campos was an elected SF Supervisor for eight years, spent three years on the SF Police Commission and won scholarships at Stanford and Harvard.

Greenberg made it clear that his and his 29-member coalition represented each of these categories, and felt more “empowered” as they begin the official recall process.

Greenberg ended with a demand from Boudin and his office to cease “ignoring valid, legitimate inquiries…about your lack of virtually any effective criminal prosecutions, turning San Francisco into a criminal’s paradise,” and to terminate the chair as the chief of staff immediately.

District Attorney Chesa Boudin has yet to respond via Twitter or with any kind of termination.

Lovepreet Dhinsa is a junior undergraduate student at the University of San Francisco, pursuing her bachelor’s degree in Politics with a minor in Legal Studies. She has a passion for criminal defense law, and strives to go to law school to fight for indigent clients. As such, she is also involved in her university’s mock trial program and student government.


To sign up for our new newsletter – Everyday Injustice – https://tinyurl.com/yyultcf9

Support our work – to become a sustaining at $5 – $10- $25 per month hit the link:

Author

  • Vanguard Court Watch Interns

    The Vanguard Court Watch operates in Yolo, Sacramento and Sacramento Counties with a mission to monitor and report on court cases. Anyone interested in interning at the Courthouse or volunteering to monitor cases should contact the Vanguard at info(at)davisvanguard(dot)org - please email info(at)davisvanguard(dot)org if you find inaccuracies in this report.

    View all posts

Categories:

Breaking News Civil Rights San Francisco

Tags:

8 comments

  1. Greenberg ended with a demand from Boudin and his office to cease “ignoring valid, legitimate inquiries…about your lack of virtually any effective criminal prosecutions, turning San Francisco into a criminal’s paradise,” and to terminate the chair as the chief of staff immediately.

    What I would suggest *instead* is that Boudin make speeches regarding white supremacy. After all, if espousing a similar view works for a school board member, why not the DA?

    Here we go again, folks!  (Let’s see what the response is to that suggestion.)  🙂

      1. Two guesses… either bares the teeth, or bears with it… but, actually don’t much care what happens in SF… on a practical basis… philosophically might be a different matter, but that would be “off-topic”…

  2. The article also mentioned that people of color were disproportionately represented in these criminal justice systems, in which they were “blamed…for their experiences.”

    I’m sorry, what “experiences” is this referring to?

  3. “Greenberg ended with a demand from Boudin and his office to cease “ignoring valid, legitimate inquiries…about your lack of virtually any effective criminal prosecutions…”

    Greenberg is stupid.  Or dishonest.  Not sure which.  How many criminal trials have occurred in San Francisco in the last year?  Very few.  Under conditions of COVID, no one is going to trial anywhere in the state.  Ironically the DA announced today that they got a conviction in a high profile sexual assault case.  But this is just a dishonest argument by Greenberg.

Leave a Comment