Whistleblower Kevin Annett To Talk in Davis, Sacramento

Annett-Kevinby Jerika L.H.

Longtime political activist, author and Nobel Peace Prize nominee Kevin Annett will be making his way to California for a speaking tour that aims to educate people about the continued degeneration of native rights in Canada. His tour sources the many points raised in his newly published books, Unrelenting and Murder by Decree, and will include three appearances in Sacramento and one in Davis.

Annett has been a figure in the Native American rights struggle for many years, often working alongside native tribes to expose corruption, abuse, racism, and historical injustices. A pastor with anthropological training, Annett lived briefly in a native village in northern British Columbia which afforded him an intimate view of the poverty and lifestyle of indigenous Canadian communities. Annett encountered anecdotal oral histories of the atrocities, which were corroborated by archival documents he discovered when studying for a PhD – an endeavor which was revoked due to a sudden pull back on funding for native historical research.

Although this seems suspicious, Annett notes that cover ups are an integral part of church law, in which taking up an issue outside of church authorities could lead to excommunication. He actualized these concerns while employed for the St. Andrew’s United Canadian Church and made native rights a focal point of his sermons and community work. His focus on church abuses perpetrated on native children led to his firing in 1995, and what he describes as a campaign of personal attacks against him led by the church and state, which ensued in an attempt to slander his research and deflect from the historical realities he brought to light.

While Annett recognizes that his work is surrounded by a sea of controversy, he notes that he has yet to meet an individual who could show any degree of proof to refute his claims. Among Annett’s main declaration is the assertion that the Canadian church has assisted in the mass killing of native children at residential schools, a claim that was officially supported with documentation in 2015.

Approximately 6,000 native children died under the care of the church in schools that were set up to “kill the Indian, save the child,” although the exact numbers remain unknown. Historical records were brought into the public arena around the same time that the UN released a report admonishing the Canadian government for its mistreatment of indigenous populations. Even today, thousands of native women and children come up dead or missing in what many have regarded as an extension of native genocide that began since the European conquest of the Americas.

Annett-2

Annett draws similarities to the underlying policies of murder, segregation and otherization that occur in the United States with other ethnic groups. He notes how most waste dumps are near a black, Chicano, or native community – and uses as a specific case study the uranium mines in South Dakota near native lands, which have resulted in high cancer deaths in autochthonous people due to radiation leakage.  In regards to the appropriation of native fashion, narratives, and lifestyle, Annett comments, “We like to keep Indians at an arm’s length, so we don’t really see how their living. We don’t see the sterilization programs, the poverty. It’s an exoticism without an understanding of the reality. It’s a museum mentality that invokes historical fantasies of peace and nostalgia, with no talk of contemporary native culture.”

Current issues affecting native populations often go undocumented. Native families sitting on valuable land often get evicted or go missing. Imprisonment, poverty, and the death rate from tuberculous is as high as they historically ever were. A high number of native children are taken away from their family and put into white foster homes, and the Child Protection Agency does not have to give grounds for taking children. Annett notes, “Canada is one of the few places left in the world where indigenous people are not full citizens under the law. It’s an apartheid system. “

While child trafficking is a big global industry, Annett regards Canada as a reflection of this global network.  His experience in the field has led him to the conclusion that crimes against native people are just as prevalent today as they were before.

“The crimes are not over; they are carrying on. Murder, rape, kidnapping, poverty, segregation, discrimination.  These are crimes by the institutions not just individuals. They can be seen in the high poverty levels and death rates of aboriginal peoples. Native women disappear without a trace, and nothing is done for accountability. I’ve seen the degree to which the church and state have tried to halt my work through methods of intimidation, and it just makes me realize – if they would go this far to stop the truth from coming to light, imagine what they’re capable of – what they did to native children.”  

The church has never officially apologized for the crimes. The first legal rendering of the case placed blame on both the church and government, but the state absorbed the lion’s share of the responsibility. Annett finds the state sentiments of regret to be insufficient. “It’s easy for the state to say I’m sorry, but how does that undo the atrocities brought about by these institutions. They still continue. They’re happening today.”

Annett’s unyielding lifelong aim to expose state sponsored violence has made himself the target of alleged smear campaigns. He regards it as simply the nature of the beast. “It’s not me that’s the controversy, it’s what I’ve raised. It’s a very common reality for whistleblowers who take on the church, state, or corporations because it’s hard for people to psychologically accept the difficult truths I have proven, it’s easier to attack the man. But I know that I am standing on the truth and I’m doing the right thing. Critics rely on name calling and innuendo, but neither the Church nor the government have sued me or have produced counter evidence. [To any critics] I say ‘talk about the evidence, show me where I’m wrong.’”

Guests are welcomed to join Annett on Wednesday, April 27, 7 – 9 pm at the Davis Community Church – it is a free event.

Annett-flyer

Author

Categories:

Breaking News Civil Rights Sacramento Region

Tags:

22 comments

  1. I am not familiar with this person. However nominations for the Nobel prize are sealed for 50 years so when someone describes themselves as a ” Nobel Peace Prize nominee ” they are likely a fraud.

    1. Annett stated Chomsky once endorsed him.  When asked about it he told me that if he did ever say such a thing it was not intended to reflect favorably.

  2. Kevin Annett is NOT a whistleblower.

    He is a BLOWER. A blower of hot air.The First Nations People of Canada are the whistleblowers – People like William Blackwater.Kevin Annett is a CON ARTIST.Nothing more and nothing less.

    DO NOT BE TAKEN IN BY THIS MAN.

    http://www.genuinewitty.com/2012/08/08/kevin-annett-a-modern-abuser-of-residential-school-survivors/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvVDMEn63Lg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M9ufk0tyqk

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5agyfBSAkks

     

  3. Thank you for allowing these comment as people deserve to know the REAL truth about Kevin Annett.
    Further information on Kevin Annett.
    Kevin Annett claims to have set up a group in Ireland in 2010 called the ITCCS.A woman by the name of Rosaleen O Brien pretended to to be a ‘Doctor’ and set up a fake ‘survivors’ group name ‘Templemores Forgotten Victims’ and genuine Residential School survivors and Magdalene Laundry survivors were lured to a fake protest at Government Buildings in Dublin by this woman.
    She now denies ever having met Kevin Annett after being challenged about her part in the Con trick.

    Kevin Annett has no ITCCS group and he has no ‘International Common Law Court’ in Brussels.
    http://cashel.anglican.org/?p=2667This is the FAKE ‘victims support group’ that ‘Dr’ Rosaleen O Brien set up in 2009 in order to facilitate Kevin Annett in setting up his equally FAKE ‘victims support group’ the ITCCS in 2010 in Ireland.As you can see there are NO ‘victims’ in the photo’s of the fist meeting and none have been added to it in SIX years.http://doctorrosaleenobrien.webs.com/apps/photos/photo?photoid=52392072There is no record of the Anglican Church in Ireland being involved in any support groups for victims of child abuse.For the record:Templemore in Southern Ireland while Antrim is in Northern Ireland.THIS POSTING BY KEVIN ANNETT IS A FALSE FLAG.http://itccs.org/what-is-itccs/“The original ITCCS federation was composed of groups from Ireland, England, the United States, Canada and Italy, including the Templemore Forgotten Victims (Antrim, Ireland), the Friends and Relatives of the Disappeared (Canada), and United Against Church Terror (USA). By September, 2013, ITCCS had spread to twenty six countries and over fifty affiliated groups. Its work is translated into thirteen languages. Its affiliates include the prestigious cult ritual and abuse survivors’ organizations SMART of the United States, and ReteL’Abuso in Savona, Italy.”In the comments section of her website  ‘Dr’ Rosaleen O Brien denies knowing Kevin Annett personally when in fact she was instrumental in organizing his FAKE protest in Dublin Ireland on the 15th of April 2010 and led the ‘protest/rally’ with her husband ‘Roy’ where they attempted to infiltrate the work of Paddy Doyle (Residential School Survivor) and members of The Magdalene Laundries victims groups.They were unsuccessful.
    http://doctorrosaleenobrien.webs.com/apps/guestbook/http://www.irishsalem.com/irish-controversies/allegations-of-child-killing-1996to2005/kevin-annett-in-ireland.php

    He is also actively involved in the UK with known Con Artist and charity scammer Belinda Mc Kenzie (who features on the cover of his book Unrelenting – Between Sodom and Zion) and he is presently involved with Nellu Berry and Sabine Mc Neill as part of what has become known as ‘The Hampstead Satanic Hoax’ or Hoaxtead,where a mother and her boyfriend tortured two children in order to makes false accusations against an innocent  Church of England Vicar,their school,their teachers and various innocent families and children.
    This whole matter is now before the Courts in the UK and of course,as always Kevin Annett is keeping his head down on this issue due to it;s serioiusness.
    This is Neelu Berrys You Tube Channel and this is one of her interviews with Kevin Annett.
    You can keep up to date with the whole case in the UK here:
    https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2016/04/15/breaking-sabine-neelu-to-face-trial-on-11-july/
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4ZLhGKtt94

    Kevin Annett has been exposed as a CON ARTIST in Ireland,England, France,Italy,Germany,Spain,Holland and Croatia and of course Canada.
    All he is doing now is moving his CON ARTISTRY to the USA.
    He is slick but then again – most con artists are but it’s the lies and lack of a good memory that catches them out in the end.
    This interview gives you some idea of the workings of Con Artist Kevin Annett in Europe.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx1DLoVFyYg
    Thank you.
    Julien C.
     

  4. “Approximately 6,000 native children died under the care of the church in schools that were set up to “kill the Indian, save the child,””

    Is he claiming they were murdered, or died of neglect or malnutrition, bad vaccines, or some form of abuse? 6,000 children is a large number; I would think the church and government would have a hard time covering up such a scandal.

    Although there is no doubt that many Indians have been abused by the US and Canadian Governments, and some by individual crooked priests and crooked mining or forest company men; I haven’t heard that any church has been involved with sanctioning long-term ongoing systematic abuse of indian children. Strong claims require strong evidence to support the claims.

    1. Funny he has downgraded the figure from 50,000 dead children to 6,000.  I wonder if anyone will press him on this revision and ask if he is agreeing with the government’s  numbers?

  5. While the author of this posting that appears to support Kevin Annett and gives him and his frauds the oxygen he requires to continue in the capacity of a con man in the USA it must be stressed that Kevin Annett is indeed a very convincing con man with all the qualities of a well oiled snake,it is however refreshing that comments from people who are speaking their truth (and concerns) regarding Kevin Annett are being allowed on this website.Indeed it was the banning of comments from Kevins victims for many years on websites,Blogs and You Tube Channels that allowed Kevin Annett to go under the radar as a con man for so along.Websites and Blogs like these come to mind and it’s worth nothing that eventually these people (con artists) have withdrawn their support for Annett when supporting his blatant scams became a liability to their scamming.

    Jean Haines: https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/kevin-annett-here-we-go-folks-the-big-guns-are-coming-out-after-kevin-thought-id-let-you-know-im-totally-with-kevin-j/

    Drake/Benjamin Fulford/Karen Hudes:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rGOBJFS_fk

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTAW2HC_WE0

    Sean Maguire:https://www.facebook.com/sean.maguire.96/posts/973098059368064

    Alfred Webre:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r4mpgSMW7U

    Ines Radman:https://wearelightbeings.wordpress.com/2014/09/22/kevin-annett-flaunts-dead-children-to-gain-support-for-itccs-contribution-from-a-reader/

    There is a long list of people in the alternative media who have also dropped Kevin Annett including:Alex Jones,Richie Allen and Mark Windows.

    There is a very long list of individuals who have been smeared by Kevin Annett and some of them have been covered by Heather Martin whos work on exposing this con man is second to none:

    http://stopkevinannett.weebly.com/testimonials.html

    There is also quite a long list of FAKE identities used by Kevin Annett in an attempt to give credibility to the existence of his ‘ITCCS’ group,his FAKE ‘ICLCJ’ (Court in Brussels) and FAKE affiliated groups one of which is NON (Not in Our Name) and is allegedly run by a religious person named Ciaran Ui Niall.Kevin Annett can’t seem to make up his mind what religion the FAKE Ciaran Ui Niall actually is.

    Is he Catholic ?

    http://itccs.org/2013/10/10/breaking-update-from-ireland-dissolving-ties-with-rome-revealing-childrens-graves-an-archbishops-dirty-ops-schemes-and-forcing-irish-clergy-to-choose-their-allegiance/

    Or is he Protestant – (posted by his friend Kitty Hundal):

    http://friendsofkevinannett.blogspot.ie/

    Interesting the company he keeps and uses to smear people:

    Kitty Hundal:http://anonymoustimmwheeler.blogspot.ie/p/blog-page.html

    Other than Kitty Hundal here are two of the most sickest people on the planet that supports Kevin Annett and promotes his FAKE groups and fake courts.

    Alexandra Meadors:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Z6R9G6Wag

    Alexander Meadors and Tory Smith:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1tKsXAUZow

    Tory Smith invents fantasy child gang rape and child mass murder stories and has a huge following of shady characters on his You Tube Channel:

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2rm3zZK_uA4aSzV2gHysGw/videos

    It is interesting that Kevin Annett states that the proof of his ‘activism’ is the fact that nobody has ever sued him.Kevin Annett is aware that the people he is exploiting and smearing are Native People and victims of child sex abuse who are do not have sufficient funds to do so.As for the claims that his ‘Court’ in Brussels has convicted TWO Popes,the Queen of England and 30 high ranking officials – why would they bother suing him over something that makes HIM look ridiculous and discredits anyone who is aligned to him?

    And don’t forget – he has also ‘DISSOLVED’ Canada and set up his own Republic.

    http://itccs.org/2015/04/07/arrest-the-convicted-war-criminals-on-our-land/

    But if Kevin Annett feels that his whole reputation is built on the fact that nobody has sued him then by the same criteria Kevin Annett should be judged and so we should ask:

    Why has Kevin Annett not sued the United Churches of Canada for ‘wrongly’ sacking him and why has he not sued Vancouver Co-Op Radio for ‘wrongly’ sacking him after he alleges that they FALSELY accused of him of smoking crack-cocaine and engaged in sexual activity with a Native prostitute on their premises, given that he has unlimited funds to travel all over the world perpetuating his fraud?

    http://backofthebook.ca/2011/05/05/kevin-annetts-unfinished-testament-page-2/4980/

    Perhaps those who are organizing these events in Davis,Sacramento might like to ask Kevin Annett to explain himself and answer some straight questions.

    Questions like – why does he deny knowing Steemas?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia5oEppCehw

    Why did he use Willam Coombs to invent this hoax and how could the Queen possibly be in Kamloops BC on the 10th of October 1964 abducting children when she was clearly on the East Coast of Canada that day?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QYeo4I9Djg

    Why did he lie to Ricky Lavellie about meeting the Mayor of Genoa?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfMWs6AJnG0

    Kevin Annett exposed indeed:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCxgV_czaVI

    Indeed:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaMaG7TM7rc

     

     

     

     

     

    1. Victims of his scam are embarrassed to have given him money for all his European holidays.  What could you charge him with when many people were willing donors.  He often threatened me (at one time with bodily harm).  I told him to bring it on…it would have been the best opportunity to expose his lies to the world and there is nothing he has been accused of that he has chosen to sue over.

      1. I know you have a mission to defend the Vanguard but are you honestly going to try and tell us that the Vanguard always gives both sides of the story?

         

        1. You said: “we often don’t get on the Vanguard.”

          Now you ask: “but are you honestly going to try and tell us that the Vanguard always gives both sides of the story?”

          Does the Vanguard “always” give both sides of the story?  No.  Do we often not get both sides of the story?  I don’t think that’s true either.

          In this case, the guy is coming here to speak, the Vanguard interviewed him, other people don’t like him.  Why is the Vanguard wrong to simply do an interview of him?

           

  6. Longtime political activist

    In other words, someone who’s personal identification and livelihood is depended on a perpetual need for activism.

    When did this “longtime political activist” chip become respected?  Answer that and you will also identify the time when western democracy entered step-5 in Alexander Tyler’s 8-steps of democratic devolution (written in 1787):

    1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
    2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
    3. From courage to liberty;
    4. From liberty to abundance;
    5. From abundance to complacency;
    6. From complacency to apathy;
    7. From apathy to dependence;
    8. From dependence back into bondage.

    He wrote:

    “A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a
    permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until
    the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from
    the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for
    the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury,
    with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose
    fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.”

    What does this have to do with perpetual activism?  It is just another way that people have learned that they can vote themselves generous gifts… basically exploiting the political system to enrich themselves.  Al Gore and Michael Moore are two examples of this to extreme.

    None of them produce anything of value… they are just self-promoters appealing to a needy political constituency that also lacks enough enterprising and productive things to do.

    All respected activists should be people that take time out of their normal productive lives to agitate for a cause and then return to their normal productive lives.  Those that don’t should not be respected.

    1. “When did this “longtime political activist” chip become respected? ”

      I have the opposite question, since when did it become an epithet?

  7. Is Seán Ó Duibhginn ainm dom .

    Tá mé gníomhaí atá ina chónaí i mBaile Átha Cliath i bPoblacht na hÉireann . Tá mé an- bhródúil as an obair a dhéanann mé agus tá mé an-bhródúil as mo ciorcal gar de chairde truted leo cabhrú liom leis na agóidí .

    I am the person who was named by Kevin Annett in October 2010 as being a ‘hired gun’ who was paid by Archbishop Diarmuid Martin.I challenged Kevin Annett then and I challenge him now to provide the proof to back up these allegations.

    http://itccs.org/tag/not-in-our-name/

    Kevin Annett is a SCUMBAG.

    I don’t seek out a lot of publicity and my protests against the Roman Catholic Church in Ireland is very personal and continues today and will until I die.This is my You Tube Channel.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BW-w48DJycc

    This is our ACCAW group Channel.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiUnQ4qC_-s

    Thank you,

    John Deegan

    1. Mr. Moderator: why is it permissible for this poster to call Mr. Annett “a scumbag”?

      [moderator] Of all the things written in the comments here, that’s the one you’re concerned about?

      1. Thank you Moderator.

        *Correction to my earlier post.The date should of course have been October 2013 and not 2013.Previous to that date I was branded a ‘hired gun’ in a private email by Kevin Annett to what he deemed his close inner circle who he hoped would do his dirty work for him (which included his father Bill) but instead a copy of that email was sent directly to me and when I challenged Kevin Annett privately in emails to provide proof of his his allegation he then repeated it on the 10/10/2013 on his WordPress Blog.http://itccs.org/tag/not-in-our-name/

        I am not going to get drawn into long debates on websites with anonymous people like ‘The Pugulist’ nor indeed with anyone.As one of the people commenting here (Frankly) put it perfectly.I have a life and it is much more productive than spending time online.

        “All respected activists should be people that take time out of their normal productive lives to agitate for a cause and then return to their normal productive lives.  Those that don’t should not be respected.

         

        I do not hide behind a dog collar and pretend to be ‘a man of God’.I do no ask others to beg on my behalf.I do not have a website (nor a PayPal account).I don’t invent ‘Courts’ or pretend that I have ‘Common Law Sheriffs’ or ‘Direct Action Units’ working for me.I don’t pretend to have ‘sources’ in the Vatican and in Police forces all over the world giving me information’.I don’t use ‘Police trained Clairvoyants’ to produce ‘evidence’ of seeing dead bodies.I don’t travel to Rome to do ‘Exorcisms’ on sidewalks or Rome pretending that I’m right outside the gate of the Vatican.I haven’t set up my own Republic.I am self funded and do what I do because I want to do it and love doing it and as my videos clearly show I have no problem saying straight to peoples faces what I have to say about them.The Archbishop of Dublin,Diarmuid Martin is a SCUMBAG as are all the Bishops in Ireland who have engaged in the cover up of abuse.Members of An Garda Siochana (Irish Police) who have tried to frame myself and family members are SCUMBAGS.I have told them so to their faces and have often named them publicly as the biggest criminal organisation in Ireland (after the Roman Catholic church).Mason Hayes & Curran Solicitors (Dublin) who issued me with Solicitors letter on behalf of the LIAR,Archbishop Martin on the 10th of July 2014 barring me from every Catholic Church in the Archdiocese of Dublin are SCUMBAGS.Members of the Civil Service in Ireland who work with The Garda Ombudsmans office and who refuse to properly investigate my complaints are SCUMBAGS.People who have smeared me on the internet with false allegations are SCUMBAGS and Kevin Annett is one of those people.Kevin Annett is a SCUMBAG.

        I thank the moderator of this website for allowing me to comment and if he/she or anyone connected to The Vanguard  feels like contacting Kevin Annett and to ask him to appear with them and myself on a three way Skype call where he will have the opportunity to provide the evidence to back up his allegation that I received money from the Archbishop of Dublin (or indeed anyone) to engage in a ‘black-ops campaign against him,I would be only too delighted to oblige and I would be more than happy to put on show all my email contacts with Kevin Annett from day one that will show who the real Kevin Annett is when he is away from his ‘Reverend’ persona and is challenged to tell the truth or to remove LIES that he has posted online.Or perhaps he might like to get Ciaran Ui Niall,Mary Hennessy,Jeramiah Jourdain,George Dufort,Carlo Freschi or Domingo Santori to appear on his behalf.I would love to do a Skype call with people who do not exist.It would be interesting.

        http://itccs.org/tag/pope/

        http://itccs.org/2011/08/03/international-media-and-community-advisory/

        http://www.gbdigest.com/2012/04/breaking-news_15.html

        I can be contacted here – accaweccles64@gmail.com.

         

         

         

  8. Thank you Moderator.

    *Correction to my earlier post.The date should of course have been October 2013 and not 2013.Previous to that date I was branded a ‘hired gun’ in a private email by Kevin Annett to what he deemed his close inner circle who he hoped would do his dirty work for him (which included his father Bill) but instead a copy of that email was sent directly to me and when I challenged Kevin Annett privately in emails to provide proof of his his allegation he then repeated it on the 10/10/2013 on his WordPress Blog.http://itccs.org/tag/not-in-our-name/

    I am not going to get drawn into long debates on websites with anonymous people like ‘The Pugulist’ nor indeed with anyone.As one of the people commenting here (Frankly) put it perfectly.I have a life and it is much more productive than spending time online.

    “All respected activists should be people that take time out of their normal productive lives to agitate for a cause and then return to their normal productive lives.  Those that don’t should not be respected.

     

    I do not hide behind a dog collar and pretend to be ‘a man of God’.I do no ask others to beg on my behalf.I do not have a website (nor a PayPal account).I don’t invent ‘Courts’ or pretend that I have ‘Common Law Sheriffs’ or ‘Direct Action Units’ working for me.I don’t pretend to have ‘sources’ in the Vatican and in Police forces all over the world giving me information’.I don’t use ‘Police trained Clairvoyants’ to produce ‘evidence’ of seeing dead bodies.I don’t travel to Rome to do ‘Exorcisms’ on sidewalks or Rome pretending that I’m right outside the gate of the Vatican.I haven’t set up my own Republic.I am self funded and do what I do because I want to do it and love doing it and as my videos clearly show I have no problem saying straight to peoples faces what I have to say about them.The Archbishop of Dublin,Diarmuid Martin is a SCUMBAG as are all the Bishops in Ireland who have engaged in the cover up of abuse.Members of An Garda Siochana (Irish Police) who have tried to frame myself and family members are SCUMBAGS.I have told them so to their faces and have often named them publicly as the biggest criminal organisation in Ireland (after the Roman Catholic church).Mason Hayes & Curran Solicitors (Dublin) who issued me with Solicitors letter on behalf of the LIAR,Archbishop Martin on the 10th of July 2014 barring me from every Catholic Church in the Archdiocese of Dublin are SCUMBAGS.Members of the Civil Service in Ireland who work with The Garda Ombudsmans office and who refuse to properly investigate my complaints are SCUMBAGS.People who have smeared me on the internet with false allegations are SCUMBAGS and Kevin Annett is one of those people.Kevin Annett is a SCUMBAG.

    I thank the moderator of this website for allowing me to comment and if he/she or anyone connected to The Vanguard  feels like contacting Kevin Annett and to ask him to appear with them and myself on a three way Skype call where he will have the opportunity to provide the evidence to back up his allegation that I received money from the Archbishop of Dublin (or indeed anyone) to engage in a ‘black-ops campaign against him,I would be only too delighted to oblige and I would be more than happy to put on show all my email contacts with Kevin Annett from day one that will show who the real Kevin Annett is when he is away from his ‘Reverend’ persona and is challenged to tell the truth or to remove LIES that he has posted online.Or perhaps he might like to get Ciaran Ui Niall,Mary Hennessy,Jeramiah Jourdain,George Dufort,Carlo Freschi or Domingo Santori to appear on his behalf.I would love to do a Skype call with people who do not exist.It would be interesting.

    http://itccs.org/tag/pope/

    http://itccs.org/2011/08/03/international-media-and-community-advisory/

    http://www.gbdigest.com/2012/04/breaking-news_15.html

    I can be contacted here – accaweccles64@gmail.com.

     

     

     

Leave a Comment