Budget/Fiscal

Street Level View Shows City Roadways Failing At Alarming Numbers

Pothole-stock.jpg

In early February the Nichols report came out showing the city’s Pavement Condition Index (PCI) was far lower than previously believed.  The average was 62, which puts the network in the fair condition category with a significant portion of the network suffering from “load-related distresses.”

Previous estimates had the number at 70, still a low number, but not quite the crisis.  One of the big differences is that the city had previously surveyed all streets and bike paths using a manual method, where “a person visually inspects each street (or path) segment and conducts a detailed survey of 10% of the segment considered to be representative of the segment’s condition.”

Commentary: Council Rolls Dice on Firestaffing

snake-eyesThe Vanguard was deeply disappointed last week when the Davis City Council pushed off the decision on fire staffing to coincide more with the public discussion of the budget.  We believed at the time and continue to believe that the issue needs to be addressed within a budgetary framework, but the issues of staffing also need their own context.

At the same time, we think the council is rolling the dice in light of the ability of the firefighters to mobilize some in the community through fear and partial information.

City Fiscal Crisis: Not Just a Few Potholes

Pothole-stock.jpgThe idea has come up that the city’s road needs amount to “filling in a few potholes.”  When one hears of a few potholes, one figures this is an aesthetic need or a mere nuisance.

Back in June of 2011, the firefighters’ union president Bobby Weist scoffed at the notion that money needed to be diverted from employee compensation to roads.

My View: Questioning the Toughness of this Council

weistSay what you want about the last council, but they knew they had their three-vote majority bloc on each vote – and if it was going to be a 3-2 vote, they did not fret it.  And so by a series of 3-2 votes, they passed their agenda whether it was the 3-2 vote not to read the Aaronson report, the 3-2 votes to pass the budgets that kicked the can down the road, or the 3-2 vote to kick the water can down the road, as well.

Early on, it seemed like the new council got it.  It was Joe Krovoza, Rochelle Swanson and Dan Wolk who voted 3-2 in June 2011, in a room that was over 90 degrees and packed with 150 city employees, to cut $2.5 million from employee compensation.  That is the type of vote where legends are made, where councils get the reputation for being tough.

Commentary: Fire Staffing Battle Becomes High Stakes Game of Chicken

OvertimeFor several years now, the Vanguard has been warning the Davis community that the fiscal condition is far worse than most people have been led to believe.  At times, citing our unfunded liabilities in retiree health and pensions, we have suggested that Davis might not be far from bankruptcy.

We now believe that assessment was wrong.  While the unfunded liabilities in both retiree health and pensions are concerning, and need to be addressed through the bargaining process, they are manageable.  Unlike other cities, Davis is not saddled with huge amounts of debt.  It has managed the fiscal crisis not by digging a deeper debt hole, but rather by failing to spend money that it needed to spend but did not have.

Council Blinks: Not Ready to Make Fire Cuts

weist-dec-2012The room was packed with firefighters and community members opposing cuts to fire staffing.  The council listened to the community concerns, they listened to the firefighters like Captain Joe Tenney, who argued that former Interim Fire Chief Scott Kenley’s plan sounds good on paper but falls apart in the in the real world, and they blinked.

Councilmember Lucas Frerichs stated his discomfort with moving forward with these cuts outside of the broader context of the budget.  Mayor Pro Tem Dan Wolk made a motion to bring this decision back within the context of discussing the budget.  Councilmember Rochelle Swanson would then push for an earlier, a May 14 check-in date.

Fire Campaign Succeeds in Scaring a Few Residents

Weist-Pioneer

If all goes as planned, by the end of the day today, the city could conceivably wrap up lengthy issues involving fire and water.  But as we know, things rarely go as planned, and while water has gotten the bulk of the attention with a highly contentious election wrapping up at 8 pm tonight, fire will take center stage this evening before the ballots are all counted.

The firefighters’ union, led by Bobby Weist, their president, have worked hard to drum up support from the community.

Enterprise Supports Reduction of Fire Staff

OvertimeThe Davis Enterprise, on the eve of the water election, uses their Sunday editorial to argue, “Money-saving change will not jeopardize public safety.”  The Enterprise writes, “While all eyes will be on results coming in from the Measure I election on the surface water project, we hope the council will give plenty of serious attention to these necessary changes.”

The editorial notes that the audit by former Interim Fire Chief Scott Kenley proposed a number of critical changes to the fire department including “a modification of the city’s response-time goal, a shared-management plan with the UC Davis Fire Department and a possible service boundary drop between the city and the university.”

My View: Discrepancy Between Police and Fire Pay Persists

Weist-PioneerBack in May of 2009, the Vanguard wrote an article entitled Why Do Firefighters Make Substantially More Than Police Officers in Davis?.  The article not only reports on the discrepancy in pay, but the questions that then Councilmember Lamar Heystek asked of then City Manager Bill Emlen.

This week, we have learned that the pay discrepancy persists.  According to city records, a firefighter in the city of Davis makes $7,748.10 per month in salary, while the police officer makes $6,752.37 per month in salary.

Firefighters Try To Rally the Public to Their Side

Weist-Pioneer

COMMENTARY: Fire Offers No Alternatives Other Than Status Quo – It was a sparse crowd on Tuesday night, at the Multipurpose Room at Pioneer Elementary School, to hear about the city’s proposed fire staffing changes.  It is part of a larger campaign to bring public awareness to the firefighters’ issue.

The firefighters, apparently believing that they cannot move council directly, are trying to mobilize people to pressure council.  If Tuesday night is any indication, this is going to be a tough task.

Firefighters Union Plans Meeting Tonight at Pioneer Elementary

weist-dec-2012Last month the Davis City Council made a series of critical decisions on fire department response time and the boundary drop.  However, when they delayed the discussion on reductions to fire staffing until what will be March 5 – election eve – due to the later hour, they gave the firefighters an opening that they are now, in one last-ditch effort, attempting to exploit.

The Vanguard obtained a flier that reads: “Did you know that the City Manager is proposing to reduce staffing/service level to the fire department?”

Water May Be Unequally Distributed Throughout the City

water-rate-iconBob Dunning recently wrote, “We have been told over and over again that Measure I is about ‘clean water’ for all residents of Davis.”

He added, “Unfortunately for the Clean Water advocates, though, when you delve into the details of the plan, it appears not everyone in town will be eligible for the same access to all this clear, sparkling, cures-what-ails-you Sacramento River water. In fact, when I asked this ‘equal access’ question of city staff, the answer that came back was startling.”

Council Stunned at the Magnitude of the Road Repair Problem

road-failureCouncil Comes to Terms with Colossal Failure of Past Councils – There were two things on Tuesday night that the council skirted cautiously around.  The first was that they did not put the blame for the debacle squarely on the shoulders of their predecessors, but they certainly hinted at it more than once.

The second was that, while they mentioned revenue options, they clearly wished to avoid a full discussion until after the March election.  After all, residents have already agreed to pay $600 per year for school parcel taxes, and they are being asked to increase their water rates by perhaps more than $1000 per year over the next five years, so it is understandable that the council would be a bit skittish about biting off more.

Report: City Faces Huge Increases in Road Pavement Costs

Pothole-stock.jpgAt Current Levels of Funding, Half the Streets will Fail by 2032, Costs Increase to Over 400 Million Dollars – Since 2009, the Vanguard has been sounding the alarm that the condition of Davis’ roadways has been deteriorating and, without an influx of money, the city would be facing tens of millions in deferred maintenance costs in the future to restore roadways to passable conditions.

In 2009, the Vanguard noted that the street maintenance was currently being funded at a traditional $800,000 baseline level.  However, we noted from then-Finance Director Paul Navazio, “The current funding level is insufficient and it leads to the deterioration of street conditions.”  The funding to address the current backlog would require an increase to $2.8 million per year, and full funding to maintain the desired pavement index is in excess of $3 million per year.

Commentary: Process Exposes Union for Being out of Touch

OvertimeFormer Davis City Manager and UC Davis Vice Chancellor John Meyer had it right, it was a strange “new world order where columnists” were essentially sitting at the table, able to ask questions of the city council.

And if anyone wants to understand once and for all why David Greenwald is a blogger, columnist, writer rather than a politician, watch my opening salvo where I point the finger at Bobby Weist for twenty years of delay on boundary drop.

Council Goes Forward with Boundary Drop, Changes to Response Time, Puts Staffing Questions Off

Fire-Davis-StockAt times it was an informative, often contentious, roundtable that saw members of the fire department and representatives from UC Davis at the table with the Davis City Council and city staff.  While the city council was able to act on several recommendations, they put off discussion of staffing changes until next month, due to the lateness of the hour.

In a somewhat unorthodox move, the city asked Rich Rifkin and myself to be participants in this roundtable.

Former Fire Chief Expresses Concerns About Fire Staffing Changes

conroy-roseBy Rose Conroy

(Editor’s Note: The following response was sent to the Davis City Council.  As a public record, we are publishing this in its entirety so that the public can read the other side of the story).

I am writing to you to express my concerns regarding the proposals in the staff report submitted to you by City Manager, Steve Pinkerton.

Misunderstandings Drive 2 In/2 Out Discussion for Firefighting in Davis

Overtime

It was a different era, when the city of Davis went to four firefighters on an engine in 1999 as a way to meet the new OSHA regulations requiring two men in and two men out in order to fight a fire.

The staff report in 1999, written by then-Fire Chief Rose Conroy, shows at that time the city responded to about 2538 calls for service with four firefighters at the main downtown station and three at the other two stations.

Special Commentary: Tuesday Night We Can Take Our City Back Once and For All

weist-dec-2012Council Will Discuss Reduction to Three Personnel on a Fire Engine – It was the 2008 city council election campaign that first really focused my attention on the firefighters.  Up until that point, they were mainly a side issue.  The issue of a fourth fire station seemed, even in the pre-Lehman Brothers collapse days, to be a pipe dream.  The issue of pensions and total compensation were just getting on my radar.

The firefighters’ union, for better or worse, ran the city of Davis for the better part of a decade.  By the end of the 2008 election, they won two of the three seats.  That meant that 7 of the last 9 councilmembers had won with their endorsement.

Commentary: Pinkerton’s Bold Move

pinkerton-steveThere is more than just a tinge of irony here.  After all, the CalPERS (California Public Employees’ Retirement System) regulations were supposed to prevent double-dipping into the pension well, whereby retired public employees, particularly public safety employees, who retired at the age of 50 could effectively have a second career where they got CalPERS pension credits.

In this case, the city of Davis finally found their man – with the skills and ingenuity to not only audit the department but stand up to what was once the most powerful union in the city and still remains quite dangerous.  But the new CalPERS regulations are putting reform efforts in jeopardy by forcing the interim chief to leave before his task has been completed.