Budget/Fiscal

Retiree Medical and Bankruptcy: Why Davis Can and Should Cut Back on Its Overly Generous Retiree Medical Plan

OPEBIn June, City Manager Steve Pinkerton’s pronouncement that the city’s retiree medical costs represent over 20% of payroll, and that number could go up as high as 25%, alarmed the Vanguard.

“Unfortunately, 20% of payroll is probably not going to cut it in the future,” City Manager Pinkerton told the city council back in June.  “We’ve been ramping this up, the council has been responsible and doing the right thing for the last three or four years by beginning to take on retiree medical, ramping it up each year from 6% to 8% to 10%, last year it was 12% of payroll, the original plan was to go 14%…”

My View: Delay the Decision on Water As Serious Concerns Still Remain About JPA and Water Projects

Sacramento-River-stockThere have been some interesting new developments this week with regard to water.  On Thursday of next week, the Water Advisory Committee (WAC) will meet in a crucial meeting that may determine at least the WAC’s recommendation for the water project.

If the speculation is correct, one member of that body may recommend we go forward with the Woodland-Davis project.  As I laid out earlier this week, while there are good reasons that we might consider doing that, especially as the cost gap is reduced, there are still looming questions.

Davis Mayor Pushes Economic Development Visioning

mori-seiki

by Mayor Joe Krovoza

If you want to take a trip and have an end destination in mind, chances are you’ll consult a map prior to departure.

The Davis community, including sustainability advocates, the business community, and the university, acknowledge that we sit at a crossroads with our approach to business development.  We have the ability and wherewithal to help guide new business developments, poise the community to take advantage of the synergy between our world-class university and our dynamic existing business community and potentially carve out long-term, environmentally sustainable economic cores for Davis.

A Move to Woodland JPA Re-opens United Water, DBO Unresolved Questions

floating-20.pngIt appears we may be heading toward a decision on water – at least from the standpoint of the Water Advisory Committee (WAC).  The committee voted to eliminate the three most expensive options.

That leaves us with two Woodland options and one West Sacramento option.  Committee member Alf Brandt indicated at the meeting that he would be ready to make a motion at the August 9 meeting.

Take the Time to Get the Water Project Right

floating-20By Michael Harrington, Pam Nieberg, and Nancy Price 

In November 2011, the Water Referendum successfully qualified for the ballot. If passed by the voters, the Referendum would have overturned the City Council’s attempt to replace our existing publicly-owned ground water system with a large, expensive, and privatized surface-water system under the Joint Powers Authority.

Rather than letting voters decide, the 2011 Council withdrew its plan, and empanelled the Water Advisory Committee (WAC) to study and recommend to the Council their preferred water project by type and size, timing, ecological sustainability, seasonal water availability, and fair and affordable rates for all ratepayers.

Gazing Into a Crystal Ball — Water Process Interest Groups — Looking Forward to a March Water Ballot

Sacramento-River-stockby Matt Williams  

Let me start by saying that the opinions and perspectives presented here in this article are those of the author and not the opinions and perspectives of the Water Advisory Committee (“WAC”).

In the past week two events have taken place that have very interesting implications when looking forward to what might happen when Davis voters actually cast their votes regarding the conjunctive use water system and the water rates recommended by the WAC, approved by Council and distributed in a Prop 218 notice.  Those two events were:

Water Project: How Much is Ownership and Joint Governance Worth?

water-rate-iconOn Thursday night, the Water Advisory Committee (WAC) narrowed down the project options from six to three.  The pattern was very clear and unequivocal. The WAC eliminated the three most expensive project options and kept on the table the three least expensive project.

Wrote Matt Williams in yesterday’s Vanguard: “The three projects still under consideration have current cost estimates of $130 million, $153 million and $157 million respectively.  Each of those projects has a different risk profile, and some movement in the costs downward is expected as those risk factors are clarified, but it is safe to say that the citizens of Davis will not be spending as much as an additional $60 million as a result of the hard work of Staff and the WAC last night.”

WAC Narrows Down the Project Options

Sacramento-River-stockby Matt Williams –

The lyrics below are by John Fogerty . . .  and the opinions hereafter in this article are those of the author, who is a member of the Water Advisory Committee, but is writing here as an individual citizen.

Left a good job in the city
Workin’ for the man ev’ry night and day
And I never lost one minute of sleepin’
Worryin’ ’bout the way things might have been

Commentary: Is Outsourcing the Best Way to Control Our Costs?

treetrimmingOn Tuesday, the city council brought back for discussion the city’s Urban Forest Management Program, to discuss how tree services would be maintained in the face of cutbacks and a transition to more heavily utilize the West Coast Arborist services, which has a contract with the city on a per tree basis.

The focus of that discussion, and for the most part rightly so, was predicated on the notion of maintaining current levels of service in the face of the city cutting costs by going away from in-house staff and toward contracted services by an external group.

Commentary: Good Move By Mayor To Appoint Lee to Water JPA (UPDATED)

Lee-Swear-in-2012One of the biggest weaknesses of the Joint Powers Authority has been that the two members serving on it were actually not representative of where the council majority was on the water issue.  Stephen Souza and Joe Krovoza were the two strongest supporters and proponents of the water project, at least at the time of the September 6 water rates.

On September 6, the ultimate vote was 4-1, but more as a practical matter, in that Rochelle Swanson and Dan Wolk had supported a one-year rate hike plan, but Sue Greenwald, wanting to go further, did not join them on the vote.  As a result, Mayor Pro Tem Swanson and Councilmember Wolk, at that time, joined the 4-1 majority.

Council Defers Decision on Payment to Woodland Until Late August

Sacramento-River-stockWater Ballot Measure Now Set for March 5, 2013 –

On Tuesday night, the council official delayed the timeline of the city’s water ballot initiative to no later than June 30, 2013, with the targeted date of March 5, in a motion made by Brett Lee and seconded by Rochelle Swanson.

The motion called for a delay of consideration of the city paying its pro rata share of the additional cost to to raise the Regional Water Treatment Facility (RWTF) site out of the floodplain until August 21 when the WAC will hopefully finish their evaluations.

City Calls for March 2013 Vote on Water

water-rate-iconCouncil Asked to Take Steps to Preserve the JPA Until the Time Comes to Dissolve It –

Last week, the WAC unanimously voted to delay the city’s water ballot measure until the spring of 2013.  This week, the council will meet to formalize the ballot timing for March 5, 2013 as well as set forth other policies.

Under the current plan, the city would also adopt a resolution that authorized the city to pay its share of the additional cost necessary to raise the Regional Water Treatment Facility (RWTF) site out of the flood plain.

Referendum Drive Leads Davis to a Better Path on Water

sig-gathering-water.jpgOn September 6, 2011 the Davis City Council in the wee hours of the morning, by a 4-1 vote, voted to move forward with the surface water project with what they called a 14 percent rate hike.

Over the course of the next three months, it became clear that there were serious problems with the rates that were passed on that day.  In fact, even Councilmember Dan Wolk appeared to be confused about what was actually passed.

The 2011 Water Referendum

water-rate-iconby Michael Harrington, Pam Nieberg, and the Leadership Committee of the 2011 Water Referendum

The referendum was born to ensure that the water rates approved 4/1 by the Davis CC on Sept 6, 2011 were either put to a citywide vote, or repealed.  The referendum qualified, and the CC thankfully repealed the rates on December 6, 2011.

The referendum was a very intense team effort by dozens of local voters led by Pam Nieberg, Michael Harrington, and others who wish to remain anonymous due to the ongoing political and economic power of the surface water project proponents.

San Bernardino’s Bankruptcy Should Be a Cautionary Tale

bankruptThe news this week that the city of San Bernardino declared bankruptcy ought to have a stunning impact on the rest of the state.  The basic problem that San Bernardino faces, as one analyst suggested, is that they ignored their economic hole for the last fifteen years and it ultimately resulted in municipal insolvency.

Over the last few years, people have attempted to ignore the specter of bankruptcy facing the city of Davis because the other communities’ problems were sufficiently different so as to have their impact minimized.

City to Look At Urban Forest Management, Tree Trimmer Position

treetrimmingAt the last meeting of the previous city council, the Davis City Council approved the budget with the understanding that city staff would bring back the matter of tree trimming services for a full discussion.

In the wake of the Davis City Employees Association decision by the Public Employment Relations Board, the city laid off nine employees, including tree trimmers, effective July 1.

Decision Time Getting Closer or Farther For the WAC

water-rate-iconby Matt Williams

As always the opinions of the author herein are his personal opinions and do not in any way represent the opinions of the WAC.

Last night’s WAC meeting came in two installments, the first of which began with a very lively Public Comment period.  Bill Streng and the Chamber Government Relations Committee were not there, but Sue Greenwald, Michael Harrington, Alan Pryor and others shared their water insights with the WAC.  If anyone thought Sue was going to fade quietly into the sunset, this WAC meeting showed that she is a potent force on either side of the dais.  Her comments were on point, helpful and even within a 3-minute time limit.

Spin Cycle

OvertimeThe June 30 deadline for the expiration of bargaining unit contracts has come and gone.  The budget has been passed, but a discussion of cuts to some positions re-opens next week.  The new council will be seated this week.

The discussion of tree trimmers has distracted us from the central core of the arguments.  Back in May, we got a bit of a taste of this as two members of the public came forward during public comment to defend the Davis firefighters.

Davis To Bring in Green Visionary to Consult on Economic Development

William_McDonoughWilliam McDonough is best known it seems for designing the Ford Motor Company’s plant with a vast green grass roof.  But in the last ten years, with his book “Cradle to Cradle,” he has, according to Forbes Magazine, “unleashed a design revolution that began examining not just what things look like, but also the chemical makeup of things: water bottles, carpet, countertops.”

He believes that “waste can be eliminated by making products that can be either recycled or re-used.”

Water Picture Grows More Complicated

Sacramento-River-stockOn Saturday the Vanguard reported on a memo from Woodland City Manager Paul Navazio to Davis City Manager Steve Pinkerton, that effectively eliminated the regional option of a joint Davis-Woodland-West Sacramento project.

But other options remain on the board.  As we indicated last week, delays in the release of the Carolla report have complicated an already tight timeframe.  There was some thought that this may take the Woodland option off the table completely.