Reasons to do this project sooner rather than later:
Every expert willing to speak publicly seems to agree we need the surface water project sooner rather than later. All the Davis and Woodland City Council members agree we do need the surface water project.
While we have, up until this point, focused on Veolia’s role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, perhaps the bigger problem that Veolia should face in gaining a contract with the Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency should be their handling of water issues in this state.
The DBO process is supposed to lock in lower rates and better results from a competitive bid process. But one common thread in both United Water which we covered on Tuesday and now Veolia is that the process actually results in higher rates and poorer service, as private companies seek to increase their profits.
Violations, High Cost, Poor Performance Leads Eight Other Municipalities in the Last Decade to Prematurely Terminate Contract with United Water
The questions about one of the contractors under consideration, United Water, associated with the CDM “team,” have been raised, both in public and by members of the Clean Water Agency.
United Water faces serious legal issues and an indictment, which claims two of its managers at a Gary, Indiana, plant “intentionally manipulated water quality monitoring results at the facility over a five-year period between 2003 and 2008.”
As we presented two weeks ago, Davis has been thrust into an unenviable bind by the creation of the water project – the choice, perhaps, between doing business with evil large companies and higher water rates.
Driving this, in part, is the decision to go with private firms to build this project through a DBO process – Design – Build – Operate. As the name implies, the contract means that the same group of companies would be involved in designing, building, and then operating (at least initially) the water project.
The latest revelations of the Davis firefighters taking out their anger at the Vanguard on a struggling local business, Westlake Market, is a reminder of a much larger issue – that of a pattern of abuse of union power and misconduct on the part of the Davis firefighters.
The Yolo Grand Jury Report from 2008 highlighted a string of incidents involving everything from abuse of authority, unfair hiring and promotional practices, hostile work environment, untoward union influence and, oh yes, being drunk and causing fights in the downtown and sleeping off drinking binges in the beds of the local fire station.
On Saturday during Farmer’s Market, a small group of mostly young people walked through the crowd – these were Occupy Davis protestors.
The Davis Enterprise reports this morning that on Saturday morning “protesters marched to the Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase Bank branch offices downtown and took up residence in Central Park.”
It sounds good, the simple notion of pitting students and water against each other. After all, in the ideal world we should just decide every project, every expenditure, every law on its own individual merits.
And so part of me wants to agree with School Board Member Susan Lovenburg when she writes, “Will these separate needs – water and students – be pitted against one another? I trust not.”
The Clean Water Agency (CWA) had a special meeting to continue the discussion from two weeks ago about two key elements of the Design-Build-Operate process that is paramount to making the water project as affordable as possible.
On the one hand, the CWA is acting cautiously on the ethics front, as serious but different issues plague two of its bidders. On the other hand, the CWA – clearly divided on the issue of offering a fourth company a chance to bid – declined to take any further action, leaving in place the companies currently in the running.
I am certain that the art community is not going to appreciate my views on this matter and that is fine. I have been on the fence about the water tank art project. On the one hand, I have argued that in these tough times, we ought to stop doing business as usual.
On the other hand, I think the public does not sufficiently appreciate that non-general fund expenditures cannot go to operating costs.
It would be perhaps fitting if the Davis firefighters, for the last several years the symbol of failed fiscal restraint in the City of Davis and really across the state and the nation, represented the undoing of Davis’ budget hopes.
That is perhaps a premature judgment, but an increasing possibility. The city had hoped it could merge the fire operations with UC Davis as a way to save money. Indeed, the pilot project was implemented a year ago, in which there would be a sharing of the two departments’ administrative staff – the fire chief, assistant chief, and two full-time division chiefs.
There has been a lot of talk about democracy surrounding the water rate referendum. Supporters of the referendum have urged those who agree with the city’s decision on the water supply project to vote, out of a sense of democracy.
Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, the Davis Enterprise took up the call this morning in their editorial, in which they called for the city to put water rates to a vote.
There are those who believe that unions have out-served their usefulness. The unfortunate fact of the matter is when people see conduct like the firefighters union retaliating against a local business for advertising in a publication that they do not agree with, the reaction of many will be the same as one of our readers.
“This is just another of a long list of examples of the public unions’ actions damaging the citizenry,” the reader wrote. “What we need [is] a one-sentence ballot initiative, to amend the California constitution that simply says that public employees cannot form unions.”
Combined with Selenium Accumulating in Davis Wetlands’ Wildlife, This is a Likely Death Knell for Davis’ Hope for a Wastewater Variance or Extension
by Alan Pryor –
Admittedly, the surface water project forum held recently by the City of Davis was well-orchestrated and rather boring with few surprises until near the end. Then, in response to a delicately-phrased question by Elaine Roberts Musser about the financial reliability of Woodland as a partner in the surface water project (an argument initially raised by some other than Ms. Musser), Woodland Councilwoman Martie Dotie assured the Davis attendees in no uncertain terms that Woodland is 100% committed to the project..
She said they had already had their Prop 218 notice providing for a good amount of the revenues they need to support the project. She then indicated they would have another Prop 218 notice next year to fulfill their revenue generation responsibilities to entirely uphold their financial end of the project.
The issue of the parking garage to be built with redevelopment money was pushed back, at least temporarily, as the council passed staff recommendations to implement focused parking and access improvements in the downtown, commission streetscape improvement and return to council by the end of 2012 with an updated comprehensive utilization analysis and conceptual plans for downtown streetscape improvements and preliminary designs for the mixed-use structure in the 34EF block.
However, Councilmember Stephen Souza’s motion to include the staff recommendation to continue with design efforts for a mixed-use structure on the city parking lot in the 34EF block died for lack of a second, as Rochelle Swanson sat out the discussion due to a conflict because of her husband’s downtown business interests.
In the continuing debate on water, that has now extended beyond the Prop 218 process and moved into a period of signature-gathering for a potential referendum or initiative, the issue of applying for a variance has surfaced as critical.
Councilmember Sue Greenwald has expressed disappointment that the council did not at least second her motion to look into getting a variance from the state in order to delay the necessity of the project, to give the city more flexibility as it works out the costs of the project.
Davis Bicycles! began to survey the two parking structures downtown last March so the community could have a respectful and well-informed discussion about the need for more parking supply, particularly very expensive additional supply in a third structure. A few members of our organization’s Board set out to collect some data. Most of our counts until September were done when we were downtown for miscellaneous errands, shopping, eating, going to movies, or for other entertainment. In other words, times we might be looking for parking spaces for our own cars except we were generally on our bicycles.
We continued taking counts for a few weeks in the spring, until the decision was made to proceed and sell bonds, with the new parking structure set to consume the lion’s share of the available funding.
Westlake Market has been struggling to stay afloat in a tough economy as a small neighborhood grocery store. Those hopes have been dealt a blow, as they became victims of an unknown boycott by the Davis Firefighters union.
The Vanguard, while making a routine public records request, stumbled upon an email dated June 28, 2011, from Eric Nelson of DANG (Davis Advocates for Neighborhood Grocers) to Mayor Joe Krovoza and Mayor Pro Tem Rochelle Swanson, alerting them that Union President Bobby Weist had instructed the firefighters “union to not shop at Westlake because Westlake had run an ad on the Vanguard website.”
Can We Be Both Cost Conscious and Socially Responsible? And what if we cannot?
The Vanguard yesterday met for nearly two hours with city staff and Mayor Krovoza on the water issue. There will likely be follow-up meetings, as well. The Vanguard’s focus at this meeting was not in rehashing the debate so far, but in trying to understand the process moving forward.
One of the big issues that is in progress now, and will become larger as it moves forward, is with the DBO process of accepting and evaluating bids.
The city council this week is doing what it should have done to begin with, evaluating the entire downtown parking landscape. Some interesting ideas and directions arose out of the staff report, that suggests perhaps the opposite conclusion than they intended – wait and see how parking develops as other critical changes are implemented.
At the same time, an editorial from the Davis Enterprise this week demonstrates a critical misunderstanding of the nature of the funding, which, while well-intentioned, pushes policies in the wrong direction.
The Board of Directors for the Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency (WDCWA) Thursday named Dennis Diemer as its new General Manager. However, it is the fact that the communication came from Kim Floyd, or Kim Floyd Communications, that has drawn the attention of the Vanguard.
According to the release, Mr. Diemer has 36 years of experience including more than 15 years as the General Manager of East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD).