Governor Brown Goes to War Against Both Sides While Keeping 2012 in Mind with Organized Labor
Last night, Governor Jerry Brown laid down the gauntlet against Republican lawmakers, accusing them of an “unconstitutional delegation of power.”
Last night, Governor Jerry Brown laid down the gauntlet against Republican lawmakers, accusing them of an “unconstitutional delegation of power.”
An already bad month is about to get worse, and we are only a third of the way through August. It seemed like, just a few months ago, a rebounding economy was triggering less deep cuts to education and other state programs.
I have fought hard to fight costs at other levels of government because my belief is that education spending is an investment in the future. Sadly, I fear these priorities will go out the window, as rising costs for water and other city government costs, along with a persistent stagnant economy, threaten to undermine education’s base.
Back in mid-April, Davis Enterprise columnist Rich Rifkin challenged the new Yolo County courthouse project, arguing “One area where the state might save some money without too much pain is with its ambitious plan to build 35 new courthouses and to renovate six old ones. In 2008, Gov. Schwarzenegger signed into law SB 1407. It provides five billion dollars for these 41 projects.”
Last fall we argued that if Jerry Brown could not fix the system, no one could. At the end of the day, no one can.
The Governor’s announcement was unveiled in a joint news conference with Senate Leader Darrell Steinberg and Speaker of the Assembly John Perez.
Last week, despite the veto, he called the efforts of the Democrats in the Legislature “valiant,” suggesting that the $11 billion in painful cuts was a noteworthy accomplishment. “I commend them for their tremendous efforts to balance the budget in the absence of Republican cooperation,” the Governor said
In a video release on Thursday, the Governor delivered a quick message that he would not not sign Senate Bill 69 and Assembly Bill 98, which together comprise the state budget passed by the Legislature on June 15, 2011.
On Wednesday Democrats send Governor Brown a budget package that claimed to close nearly ten billion in the budget deficit, although it includes several tricks and maneuvers that the Governor has said he does not want.
Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, said Tuesday “We are out of time and we’re out of room. We’ve got to get this done.”
71 teachers and other protesters were arrested May 9 after about 200 of them gathered in the rotunda of the Capitol around 5 pm. The CHP told them the building was closed around 6:15 or so and began arrests a few minutes later.
We have pointed out numerous times that the current budget crisis is actually a revenue crisis caused by what some are now calling the Great Recession. State spending is actually at its lower level in real dollars in decades. Yet we retain around a $15 billion deficit, give or take for the latest adjustments.
But I am less than convinced that character as a whole makes any difference as to whether a person is capable of carrying out faithfully the obligations of office. And so, if I have to choose between two people I agree with on the issues, I may choose the better person for the purposes of breaking a tie.
In defined contribution plans, employers do not incur unfunded pension liabilities, since the contribution portion is defined rather than the output or the benefit. There is an advantage, thus, to the employer but it increases the risk to the employee.
There is no question legislators can be very short-sighted when it comes to budgetary decision making. Such is the case with adult day health care in California. There has been a move this year and previously, to eliminate adult day health care as a cost saving measure. In reality, to eliminate adult day health care would end up costing the state more money, not less. And it would disproportionately affect the disabled and low income, contrary to well settled law.
Mr. Walters continues, “The outcomes were not surprising. All of the districts were in relatively affluent communities that tend toward liberal politics. Their voters decided that enhancing education for their children, grandchildren and neighbors was worth taxing themselves.”
Politics have derailed this effort and it appears increasingly likely that the budget gap will be closed through an all-cuts budget, despite a strong majority of the public who prefer the opportunity to at least vote on the Governor’s tax extension package.
One of my chief complaints about the management of the budget deficit in the City of Davis was the state of denial the former city manager was in, and thus by extension the rest of the city, most particularly city employees and to some extent the broader community.
As we look to a new city manager, we must keep in mind the fact that, just because things are not as bad here as elsewhere does not mean we are not on the brink. The brink being looking down the barrel of huge increases in the cost of pensions and retiree insurance, based on huge and growing unfunded liabilities.
Another key provision of the his plan was the elimination of redevelopment and the transfer of those funds to state purposes. Last week, the Legislative Counsel declared the Governor’s redevelopment plan unconstitutional.
The website strongly criticizes eight figures who they say are leading the charge to change public pensions. These include Dan Pellissier, president of California Pension Reform; Marcia Fritz, executive director of the California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility; and an “anonymous out-of-state billionaire.”