State of California Archives - Page 101 of 104

The Fight is on for Federal Education Money

By David GreenwaldDecember 11, 20099 comments

California is trying to pass legislation that will clear the way for Calfiornia to compete in the Race to the Top program which would make the state eligible for up to 700 million. The money would go to reform the nation’s worst-performing schools. However, a fight has emerged on what role Charter Schools should play in this effort.

Earlier this week, the Assembly approved legislation by Assemblymember Julia Brownley (D-Santa Monica). This legislation would lift the cap on the number of charter schools in California, at the same time revamping the state’s academic standards and target federal funding to those schools most in trouble.

Furthering the End of the California Dream of Affordable and Accessible Higher Education

By David GreenwaldDecember 2, 200911 comments

We have spent much time on these pages discussing the issues facing UC particularly in recent weeks the massive 32% pay hike, the issue of the furloughs, the issue of accountability, and the issue of the quasi-privatization of the upper tier of California public higher education system.

Garnering less attention are the fee increases and policy shifts affecting the California State University system. On Tuesday, the California Faculty Association, who represents faculty members of the CSU system, issued a “white paper” chronicling the restructuring of the CSU system that will fundamentally change its mission.

UC Regents Raise Fees 32% Amid Bleak Economic News

By David GreenwaldNovember 19, 200948 comments

As expected, a committee of the UC Regents voted on Wednesday to raise student fees by a total of 32 percent over the next year. These hikes will bring the annual cost of a UC education above $10,000 for the first time ever. The full board is expected to ratify these changes today.

There were massive student strikes at UCLA where the UC regents held their meeting and at UC Berkeley where many of Northern California Students Coalesced.

Newsom’s Exit From Governor’s Race Brings Clarity

By David GreenwaldOctober 31, 200926 comments

But Attorney General Brown’s Misstep Should Bring Pause –

The polls had consistency shown that Former Governor and current Attorney General Jerry Brown was the odds on favorite to the win the Democratic nomination for the Governorship in 2010. In fact, not only is he odds on favorite to win the nomination, he holds a commanding lead over either of his would-be Republican challengers.

That he has not formally declared for the race is a mere formality. San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom brought those factors into play when he finally did what he had been rumored to do for weeks–drop out of the race.

Poll of Police Chiefs Shows Death Penalty Ranked Least Among Crime-Fighting Priorities

By David GreenwaldOctober 24, 200914 comments

California spends $137 million per year on the death penalty and has not had an execution in almost four years, even as the state pays its employees in IOUs and releases inmates early to address overcrowding and budget shortfalls.

A report was released earlier this week by the Death Penalty Information Center. It concludes that states are wasting hundreds of millions of dollars on the death penalty, draining state budgets during times of economic crisis when money could be used more effectively on other programs.

Two Studies Indicate Furloughs May Not Save State Money

By David GreenwaldOctober 17, 200929 comments

Earlier this week, the Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes released a report that concluded that the furlough savings was illusory at 24.7 facilities, specifically at state hospitals, prisons, and other 24/7 facilities that are under state operation. This finding by itself carries a considerable consequence, but amazingly it is not the only finding of its kind.

But another study done by UC Berkeley’s Center for Labor Research and Education released on Thursday found that:

Thinking About Ways To Save Public Universities

By David GreenwaldOctober 7, 20096 comments

A little over a week ago, the Chancellor and Vice Chancellor of UC Berkeley, Robert Birgeneau and Frank Yeary wrote an op-ed published on both coasts arguing for a new hybrid model as a means to save California’s public universities.

They wrote:

“The economic crisis has made this a countrywide phenomenon, with devastating cuts in some states, including California. Historically acclaimed public institutions are struggling to remain true to their mission as tuition rises and in-state students from middle- and low-income families are displaced by out-of-state students from higher socioeconomic brackets who pay steeper fees. While America is fortunate to have many great private universities, we do not need to add to the list by privatizing Berkeley, Illinois, Rutgers, etc. On the contrary, we need to keep our public research and teaching universities excellent and accessible to the vast majority of Americans.”

The Vanguard Fights To Protect Anonymity of Commenters

By David GreenwaldAugust 8, 200977 comments

On July 27, 2009 The Vanguard received a notice from the legal department at Google. The notice read:

“Google has received a civil subpoena for information related to your blog and anonymous comments posted on your blog. The case is entitled Calvin Chang v. Regents of University of California, Superior Court, County of Sacramento, State of California.”

The case involves a story posted on the Vanguard’s old Blogger site run through Google. The article, “Former UC Davis Officer Claims Violation of Settlement Agreement” highlights the lawsuit that UC Davis Police Officer Calvin Chang brought against his former department and University in part for harassment and in part for a violation of a previous settlement agreement. There were seven postings that were either anonymous or pseudonymous that according to Officer Chang might have originated from a former supervisor and therefore go to the heart of the case.

Legislative Counsel Opinion Suggests Governor Overstepped Authority on Line Item Vetoes

By David GreenwaldAugust 6, 200910 comments

Last week Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger attempted to balance the budget by using his line-item veto authority to cut from various sectors of government in order to balance the budget while building a half billion dollars into the reserve. He focused his cuts on social services and health programs that have already experienced huge cuts.

While the Governor argued that he was forced to do by the Assembly which removed some of the money from the budget they passed including taking local money that goes for infrastructure and also removing offshore oil leases as a solution, Democrats such as Assemblymember John Perez (D-Los Angeles) immediately cried foul.

State Takes 4.5 million dollars from Davis

By David GreenwaldAugust 1, 200913 comments

The Sacramento Bee has launched a new database to show how much money the state’s new budget takes away from cities and counties. Overall the state is taking away 2 billion dollars of direct money from cities and counties along with another 1.7 billion dollars from local redevelopment agencies this fiscal year.

During the budget agreement cities threatened lawsuits against the state if the state followed through with a suspension of Proposition 1A which was passed by the voters to prevent the state from raiding monies that are designated for cities and counties. While the cities and counties were able to get a devastating take away from transportation funds, the state prevailed in taking monies from redevelopment and also Prop 1A. Cities and counties are now in the position where they will have to decide whether or not to sue the state.

California’s Budget Deficit Closed But Not Eliminated

By David GreenwaldJuly 25, 200911 comments

There were not many pieces of good news in the budget however there was some. For environmentalists the defeat of the Tranquillon Ridge oil drilling project in the majestic waters of the Central Coast was the result of strong and almost unanimous pressure from environmental organizations. Republicans in the Assembly fought the reimbursement of education for the funds that were raided but were defeated in that effort. Cities won some on Friday as monies that were raided on Monday were restored in the floor fight.

All told, the legislature ended up falling short of closing the entire budget deficit. In the meantime education, health care, support for disabilities, state workers, and other programs took huge and devastating hits.

BUDGET DEAL: Devastating Cuts for Education, the Poor, Health Care, and Local Governments

By David GreenwaldJuly 21, 200935 comments

This is going to sound a lot like what I said back in February, but it is so much worse in part because these cuts are top of what was cut back in February. The budget is an all-cuts budget that cuts over 26 billion dollars from the budget. There are no revenue enhancements here, only cuts.

Taking the brunt of the blow once again is education which has now had over 17 billion dollars in cuts in the last two budget deals. That represents nearly one-third of the funding for education which is also the single largest line item on the budget.

Budget Deal May Hinge on More Cuts to Education

By David GreenwaldJuly 16, 200938 comments

Suspension of Prop 98 May Be Last Sticking Point –

Early yesterday the word came down that a budget agreement in Sacramento was imminent. If true, that would have meant that the legislature’s leaders from both sides of the aisle would have reached tentative agreement with the Governor on a plan to cut an additional 26 billion dollars from the budget. Bearing the brunt of these cuts have been the poor, the disabled, state workers, and of course education.

Late last night it was announced that talks had stalled and word leaked out that the point of difference was what to do about education, specifically Proposition 98. Education has already suffered cuts of well over $10 billion and that number could increase even more if the legislature agrees with the Governor to suspend it.

California is Out of Cash and Out of Time

By David GreenwaldJuly 11, 200923 comments

Debunking the Myths of California’s Budget Crisis –

State offices throughout the state were closed yesterday as the state endured another furlough Friday. The July 1 deadline came and went last week with no agreement between the Governor and the legislature. The Governor could have saved the state and taxpayers nearly three billion dollars had he simply accepted a partial solution last week. But instead he held out for the entire 23 billion dollars in spending cuts and when that did not materialize, he vetoed the legislature’s effort and so now instead of having a 23 billion dollar deficit we have a 26 billion dollar deficit.

Ten days have passed since that point, the state is out of cash, had the Governor simply taken the partial solution, at least we would be solvent at this point and would have enough cash to pay our bills. Instead people are not being paid with IOUs. The average person probably has not felt this yet, but that will be coming. The Governor is now talking about a fourth furlough day or another 5% paycut for state employees (which is functionally the same thing) and state employees are talking strike.

AB 155 Prevents Cities From Filing For Bankruptcy Protection

By David GreenwaldJuly 10, 200913 comments

By Justin Smith –

The California Assembly recently approved AB 155 (Mendoza), a bill that prohibits cities and counties from filing bankruptcy without state approval and is headed to the Senate. The bill requires local governments and counties to get approval from the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission (CDIAC) before filing for bankruptcy.

The California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission consists of the State Treasurer, the Governor or the Director of Finance, the State Controller, two local government finance officials, two Assembly Members, and two Senators.

BREAKING NEWS: California Supreme Court Upholds Prop 8 Ban on Same Sex Marriage

By David GreenwaldMay 26, 200922 comments

The California Supreme Court by a 6 to 1 vote today, with the only dissenting Justice, Carlos Moreno, also the only Democrat on the court, upheld the ban on Same Sex Marriage that was passed by the voters last November in Proposition 8.

Justice Moreno in his dissent argues that enforcing equal protection requires protection for all aspects of the law.

Analysis: Results of Election Should Not Be Interpreted As A Tax Revolt

By David GreenwaldMay 23, 200947 comments

Many on the right have argued the results of this election should be interpreted as an extension of the Tea Parties that emerged in April and a revival of the tax revolt from the 1970s. The problem with that interpretation is that many of the people who voted against the ballot propositions were actually political liberals who had a very different reason for voting against it.

An additional problem with this interpretation is that of the propositions, only Proposition 1A impacted taxes and even that only two years down the road and only to continue already implemented tax increases for an additional two years.

Commentary: For California It’s May 20th and the Sky is Falling

By David GreenwaldMay 20, 200980 comments

In most ways, what happened at the polls yesterday (or perhaps what did not happen as most people did not vote) is only symbolic in terms of the bigger scheme. The voters were asked in a way to codify an imperfect and in the end insufficient budget deal from February to balance the budget shifting, borrowing, repaying, and eventually capping future spending.

The voters rejected such overtures and probably Assembly Majority Leader Albert Torrico hit the nail on the head when he said last night:

Vanguard Recommendation: Vote No on All Budget Initiatives

By David GreenwaldMay 15, 200917 comments

I have gone back and forth on the ballot initiatives as to whether or not to support them. A few weeks ago I reached what I thought was my final decision, I would simply hold my nose and vote for them. At that time, we were projected to have about a 14 or 15 billion dollar deficit if the propositions failed. That would be reduced to a more manageable but still serious eight billion. I did not like what the propositions did, but if they failed other things that were important would have to be cut, including more from education. So I was going to hold my nose and vote for them.

It is ironic that in the last week, the very measures that Governor Schwarzenegger has trotted out to “scare” voters into for the measures, are the very reason I am now going to vote against all of the propositions. The deficit is too large and passing the propositions makes too little impact on the budget deficit to warrant holding my nose. I will briefly get into each one of them individually, but many of them rely on simply shifting and borrowing monies. That’s not much of a solution to the longer term problem.

Bad to Worse: Governor Projects Deficit at 21 Billion Week Before Special Election

By David GreenwaldMay 12, 200947 comments

Critics are crying foul with the timing of Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger’s announcement that the state will face a deficit of 21 billion dollars should the state not pass the ballot initiatives next Tuesday. But at this point it almost does not matter. If they do pass it, the deficit will be a mere 15 billion dollars, hardly cause for celebration.

At this point, six billion is helpful if Propositions 1C, 1D, and 1E pass. That state would gain six billion dollars against the total total deficit by virtue of shuffling monies around.

But Attorney General Brown’s Misstep Should Bring Pause –

Debunking the Myths of California’s Budget Crisis –

Recent Posts