Around 100 UC Davis students waged a silent sit-in yesterday in protest against acts of bigotry in the UC System over the past month. The student wearing all black and tape or other coverings over their mouths, sat in silent protest yesterday.
The first hour was spent in the MU, the second hour at the Silo, and the event ended up at Mrak Hall. Students every half an hour broke their silence to list their demands and every hour changed places, marching through campus also in silence.
In October of last year, Councilmember Lamar Heystek stunned many in the community and many of his closest supporters by announcing he would not seek a second term to the Davis City Council. As it turned out that would not be the end of the story for Mr. Heystek who has distinguished himself during his first term as a strong advocate for fiscal responsibility in the city of Davis while at the same time he remains graceful and civil on the dais.
Last week, the Vanguard reported that community members and supporters of Mr. Heystek had launched a “Draft Lamar” petition located at draftlamar.com that urged him to reconsider his decision not to run. Apparently those efforts have had a great impact on Mr. Heystek.
And then there were three again. There was a brief period of time when it looked like candidates Sydney Vergis and Joe Krovoza would be anointed rather than elected to the Davis City Council. That was in a period where everyone believed that Mayor Ruth Asmundson would not run for a third term on City Council.
However, at the same time that the Mayor publicly announced that she would not run, a third candidate entered the race, Rochelle Swanson. She told the Vanguard last night that she now filed her paperwork and is officially a candidate for the Davis City Council. She did not send out a formal press release and she will not have an official announcement party.
In November it was suddenly discovered that the city had issued 37 permits in the city of Davis allowing NewPath to construct a telecommunications network in the city. However, when residents caught wind of this, it was discovered that the permits were improperly issued based on the city’s Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ordinance.
City Manager Bill Emlen and the City Council appeared to be caught unaware by these developments, but the City Manager quickly issued a stop work notice and revoked the Permits. NewPath appealed that decision, but the City Council on January 19, 2010 denied the appeal and upheld Mr. Emlen’s decision. NewPath as we reported a few weeks ago has filed a lawsuit against the City of Davis including a motion for a preliminary injunction.
The challenge to the Gang Injunction was originally to begin today (March 9), however last week, Judge David Reed suddenly recused himself citing a number of cases that he was involved in as a defense attorney that the District Attorney’s Office intends to use. That move was likely a ploy by the District Attorney’s Office to remove Judge Reed who seemed to view their case more unfavorably than others.
The trial will now proceed in April with Judge Kathleen White presiding as she did over the preliminary injunction. Yesterday, a three judge panel in the Third Court of Appeals issued a ruling on a challenge to that preliminary injunction.
Last week we ran a story that examined proposed changes to the city’s Housing element Update that was apparently reviewed by the State Department of Housing and Community Develop (HCD).
The HCD reviewed the city’s Housing Element Update, a process that began back in 2007 and was completed in 2008. They made a large number of suggested revisions and apparently they need to approve the document before it is finalized.
One of the things I promised myself I would never do as I grow older is scoff at the younger generation as though my generation had it right and the younger generations are about to lead us off a cliff. The fact is that you can go back to the Greek Philosophers and Poets and somehow the younger generation was about to cause the collapse of civilization.
While the generations older than me will roll their eyes at the notion, I do have nearly 20 years on most of the kids in college. I will preface my comments on the strike a bit, saying it was probably not the safest or brightest idea to attempt to block I-80, at the same time, somehow the kids of 1971 managed to do the same thing, and at least from the cursory view of history, succeed at it.
In case you missed it last week, TV cameras and the news were ready to swoop back down on Davis to watch the expected carnage that would ensue if the council proceeded to attempt to implement new rules sanctioning a councilmember who got out of line in a serious way as we saw back in January. The problem with the rules is that they threatened to bring the police into the political process which invokes images of un-Americanism.
The good news is that the authors of the sanction provision have pulled back for now. The bad news is that at least one of the members of the dynamic duo do not seem to get what all of the uproar was about.
Just about everyone understands that there is a problem with the structure of the current pension system in California right now. It is a problem that was brought to the fore by the recent economic and market collapse that put a strain on a tenuous CalPERS investment system.
The problem is the solution is elusive at best. Recently the word came down that neither Governor Arnold Schwarzenneger nor Republican candidate for Governor Meg Whitman will back an initiative that would have reduced pension payments and extend retirement ages for new state and local government hires. Would have is the operative word because the initiative has been suspended in part because they were counting on major funding from Ms. Whitman.
Two weeks after Chief Rose Conroy abruptly retired, Davis has announced that they have hired William (Bill) Weisgerber, Jr. to serve in an interim capacity for the next several months.
Back in November at the same time the Davis City Council gave the fire department a 400,000 battalion chief leadership model, the city had announced that Fire Chief Rose Conroy would be retiring. In fact, she officially retired in November, but had agreed to stay on as the acting fire chief in order to allow for continuity and participate in some pending matters.
Remember 2006, at the time, PG&E spent over $10 million to prevent Yolo County from turning to SMUD for its power. It was a complicated process in that Yolo County had to pass two initiatives and Sacramento had to approve.
SMUD was the one time when every single official in Yolo County – every member of the city councils in Davis, Woodland, and West Sacramento and every member of the County Board of Supervisors endorsed SMUD, but they were not enough to overcome the $10 million campaign that had to rank of the most dishonest people have ever seen. Yolo County narrowly passed one of the initiatives, the other very narrowly failed, and Sacramento overwhelmingly voted no.
Students protesting fee hikes and other cuts to education got into a confrontation on Thursday with police as police attempted to block access to the I-80 freeway on-ramp exiting the UC Davis campus. One student was detained and a number of minor injuries resulted from the confrontation.
The Vanguard spoke with two of the protesters who were up on the front lines of the confrontation. The confrontation took place right before the freeway on-ramp just past the Mondavi center.
What started out as a modest story on the Vanguard has now been featured in stories across the world. Yes you read that correctly. On Monday February 8, 2010, the Vanguard wrote a story called “Yolo County Man Faces Third Strike For Stealing Cheese.”
It will not go down as the most read story on the Vanguard however it is probably by far the most influential. Because the Vanguard ran this story, the Sacramento Bee ran a follow up a few days later. As we reported to you, by Thursday, the Yolo County District Attorney had pulled back the push for three strikes and only asked for 11 years.
Across the state today, students, staff, and faculty members protested huge cuts to public education and fee increases to students. The situation in Davis threatened briefly to explode as over 100 students marched to an i-80 onramp and threatened to block freeway traffic.
They were halted by hundreds of law enforcement officers in riot geer. At one point, pellet guns were fired and batons used in an effort to stop the students.
Students were speaking out in a rally on Wednesday at the UC Davis Campus after yet another round of hate related graffiti and vandalism hit the campus. Official found swastikas spray painted in at least three additional locations on Wednesday morning and quickly removed them. This follows the incident of a swastika carved in a student’s residence hall door and the attack on the LGBT center last week.
Statewide there have been a slew of incidents coinciding with heavy cuts and fee hikes to the UC. On Wednesday, a small but determined group, whose numbers were depleted by the threat of rain, met at the Memorial Union and marched to Mrak Hall.
On January 26, 2010, the Vanguard reported that the Natural Resources Commission had approved a water rate hike of 18% for next year. That increase was pending approval by the Davis City Council, but on Tuesday the City Council was asked to approve the noticing of a much more modest increase of 5% for water and 6% for sewer.
That is the good news. The bad news is that just means that water rates will have to go up much faster in the future to make up for the smaller increase now. When asked why that was, staff was unable to provide an adequate answer. However, as we learned on Tuesday, the residents of Davis are facing increases of 23% for next year, and 20% for the following three years as the result of the smaller increase starting in September.
Last October Councilmember Lamar Heystek announced that he would not seek a second term as Councilmember. The move stunned many in the community who had grown to respect him for both his principles and demeanor on the dais.
As time has gone on since that point, a small number of candidates has emerged Sydney Vergis, Joe Krovoza, and the most recent Rochelle Swanson. Meanwhile as we reported yesterday afternoon, Mayor Ruth Asmundson will not seek a third term.
Mayor Ruth Asmundson made official what many have speculated in the weeks following the January 26, 2010 City Council Meeting she will not seek a third term to the Davis City Council. Her decision is just one of several changes to what was shaping up to be a rather mundane council race. Right now her decision means that neither incumbent will seek re-election. Last October Councilmember Lamar Heystek announced that he would not seek re-election siting personal reasons in his decision. However, as we report above, a group of citizens is mobilizing to get him to possibly reconsider that decision.
The Mayor’s decision comes as little surprise. There was the well-publicized blow up on the dais between herself and colleague, Councilmember Sue Greenwald. Both have expressed regret for the incident, however at the time the confrontation left the Mayor badly shaken. She was rushed to the hospital, transferred to Woodland, where she remained overnight. She then spent a couple of weeks in the Phillipines, resting and recovering from the incident.
California taxpayers, in a system that is so strapped they are releasing minor felons, will have to pay the bill for one more. That was determined on Monday when Judge Thomas Warriner sentence Robert Ferguson to seven years and eight months in prison in part of the crime of stealing less than four dollars worth of cheese in addition to another petty theft that saw the theft of a woman’s wallet.
It could have been a lot however, as originally, the District Attorney’s Office was arguing for conviction under the three strikes law.
City Staff Argues Changes Are Needed for HCD Approval –
The City of Davis underwent a lengthy Housing Element Update process back in 2007 that was eventually adopted in 2008. While it was certainly a diverse committee, the work that they produced was commendable and seemed agreeable or at least tolerable to most.
What has apparently now happened is that the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has reviewed the document and has made some recommended changes.