Trump Has the Keys to the Surveillance State, but CA Has a Long History of Changing the Locks

By Anna Porto

When Donald Trump takes the oath of office later today, he will inherit an unprecedented surveillance state that includes expansive powers and databases filled with information on millions of people. He has suggested this system could be turned on Muslim Americans and that NSA reforms triggered by Edward Snowden’s disclosures should be rolled back. While government spying is not new, the potential for abuse is greater than ever before.

Yet here in California, we have the tools to fight back. California’s robust constitutional rights and state laws can serve as a shield to protect the civil liberties and civil rights of all residents. If history is any predictor of the future, California will play an important role in protecting privacy and free speech and combatting government surveillance in the years to come.

Since its founding, California has been a leader in protecting privacy and free speech. And our policies have changed to address every major advancement in technology. In 1849, the delegates tasked with drafting the California Constitution adopted a provision ensuring that “every citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects.” California was ahead of its time – when those delegates drafted and adopted California’s free speech provision, the U.S. Supreme Court had not yet interpreted the federal First Amendment as applying to the states. In 1862, California took another leading step to protect civil liberties, when it became the first state to prohibit the government from tapping telegraph lines.

A century later, the modern threat posed by then-nascent digital technology motivated Californians to amend the state constitution and provide for an explicit right to privacy. It was 1972 and California residents were troubled by the “dossiers of American Citizens” compiled by new computers and now collected in databases – and increasingly vulnerable to government spying and corporate privacy invasions. California’s constitutional right to privacy ensures every Californian has an “inalienable right” to pursue and obtain privacy. This explicit right to privacy is more robust than the Fourth Amendment, as it protects against privacy intrusions by the government and by private parties.

California has continued to lead in the 21st century with laws that safeguard constitutional rights to privacy in the digital age. In October 2015, the legislature passed and Governor Jerry Brown signed The California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA), which went into effect in January 2016. CalECPA, considered the nation’s best digital privacy law,  requires the government to obtain a warrant to search electronic devices or compel access to any electronic information from a provider like Facebook or Google. Prior to CalECPA’s passage, warrantless government demands for information were skyrocketing—companies like Google reported a 180% increase in demands from law enforcement in just a five-year period.

California’s robust privacy protections have a particularly important role to play at the local level, where there is often the most interaction with the government. In the last fifteen years, more than a billion dollars a year has been sent down from the federal government to local police and sheriffs across the country to buy and build sophisticated surveillance technologies and use them, most often in secret and without adequate oversight to protect civil rights and civil liberties. But Californians are leading the charge against secret and discriminatory surveillance.

In Oakland, community members dismantled a plan for a spy center, and the city’s new Privacy Commission (the first in the nation) recently unanimously approved a local ordinance that would require transparency, accountability, and oversight for all surveillance technology decisions. It will be up for a vote at the City Council soon. Santa Clara County was the first county in the country to have a public debate about invasive cell-trackers, stopped its Sheriff from purchasing this surveillance device, and passed the first county surveillance technology ordinance in the nation. Palo Alto, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Berkeley, and several other California cities are also moving forward with ordinances of their own. And the ACLU of California this year exposed and shut down secret social media surveillance systems being used by law enforcement across the country.

We don’t yet know how the incoming presidential administration will try to use or abuse surveillance powers. But one thing is certain: as Californians, we have an arsenal of civil liberties protections, and we intend to use them.

Anna Porto is a Technology and Civil Liberties Intern with the ACLU of Northern California.

Author

Categories:

Breaking News Civil Rights Sacramento Region

Tags:

39 comments

  1. Since its founding, California has been a leader in protecting privacy and free speech. 

    In 1849, the delegates tasked with drafting the California Constitution adopted a provision ensuring that “every citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects.” 

    Where was California last Friday night?

  2. We don’t yet know how the incoming presidential administration will try to use or abuse surveillance powers.

    But we do know how the outgoing presidential administration abused them.

      1. David

        What is comforting you?  The corrupted  justice system  with 378  years prison sentences sentences ? Police brutality? 24 million people in prisons ?  Unprotected borders ? 11 million undocumented immigrants and detention centers full of them ? 50 million deplorable  on food stamps with out hope for better life in America ? Living in fear because   groups of bandits named ISIS , Al-Queida and others like them which are  plotting terrorist attacks around the globe and in America .

        You are crying a lot but you don’t provide and ideas which would change people life for better. The empty slogans and propaganda about democracy, justice for and equality for all  will not make anybody life better. We need administration which will restore the law and order and  would provide a better life for these 50 million Americans  on food stamps .  The democracy,  constitution , liberty , equal rights for all means nothing if the  people are hungry , having no hope and being killed on the American cities street every day because crime is out of control .  This nothing to do with left or right . This is  a necessity to restore the law and order and stop the march of anarchy which destroying America.

        1. Jaroslaw, are you saying that the only way to make America great again is to put everyone under surveillance so that national police forces can disappear the bad actors?

        2. Dave

          This not what I am saying.  I don’t believe that the new President’s administration  would spy on people .The new President  has a different goals than spying on everybody. The certain  groups of people or organisations were always monitored does not matter we liked  it or not .  Today’s America is not  the same America as it was 30 or 40 years ago.  With the today’s  very advanced communication  technology , social media etc and the  half  million of newcomers every year from third world countries  the  America is getting some folks with strange and sometimes very dangerous ideas. Not all  the countries where immigrants are coming  from are the  friendly countries to USA.  Better be sure than sorry.

          I am an  immigrant myself and I  was watched by  assigned to me FBI’s  agent for almost 10 years . I knew his name and I had no problem to be watched .  The United State  of America law enforcement  should screen and monitor  the newcomers from  foreigner  countries  until the law enforcement decide that they are not posing any threats to Americans and Americans should support such measure .   Monitoring should with done in the proper way and in according to the  law without affecting anybody life and  without  the witch hunting other  people  because they have a different believes and their culture is different.  My life would  not change regardless who would be the in charge of  the White House.  I don’t like war mongers .

          Bottom line is: If you coming to America than respect law of this country and don’t abuse American social system which is very generous and costly to the taxpayers.

    1. And, the outgoing president allowed his predecessor’s policies/legislative approvals to remain in effect… the “Patriot Act” did not come into being on Mr Obama’s watch… that would have been a “conservative” Republican who signed it into law… “Mr Shrub” as I recall…

        1. I was going to go down the list, but I just a good tweet – there are two countries, he spoke to one of them.  You’re clearly in that one.  That’s fine.

        2. nominees did nothing to reassure the country on the way forward.

          Virtually every nominee Trump put forward has come under fire.  Do you see a trend here, did it really matter who he chose?

          Remember, as Obama stated:  “elections have consequences”.

           

          1. Did it really matter who he put forward? Probably. Had he put mainstream, experienced, qualified people forward they would have come under considerably less fire. There was no test of that because the people he did put forward all came from a common place of inexperience and extremism.

        3. I would’ve been concerned if people on the left had liked his speech or his nominees.

          Another Obama quote:

          “You don’t like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election,” Obama said. “Push to change it”

          That’s exactly what happened.  Oh my how words can come back to haunt.

  3. For a very interesting analysis of what is happening here and abroad, I recommend the lecture by Brown Univ. professor Mark Blyth called “Global Trumpism” on YT.

    1. Leanna

      Trumpism is not global . America is a completely different modern empire with the  different principles and philosophy than any other country on the planet Earth.

    1. An average of 3 bombs dropped per hour (over 16,000 total) on 7 different countries with which we are not officially at war in 2016 alone. If that doesn’t qualify as the actions of empire, I’m not clear what would.

  4. Inherit is the operative term here, with the outgoing president expanding those capabilities as one of his parting shots. The incoming president has been in office one day and here is a piece projecting that the egregious privacy violations and record-breaking prosecution of whistleblowers of the past eight years will undoubtedly be surpassed. Are there no limits to the levels of delusion out there?

  5. And why, exactly, does Keith O post other than under his own name?  All I hear from him is glee to sticking his finger into the eye of those others who don’t agree with him.  Unenlightening and childish.

    Putting power back to the people.  What’s not to like about that?

    Not even T*** claimed he was returning power to the people.  Power to billionaires like himself, yes, but not to anyone around this town.

    1. All you hear is that I have a different world view than you and you don’t like it so you attack me.  Your comment is the one coming off as “Unenlightening and childish”.  

      Not even T*** claimed he was returning power to the people. 

      I not surprised that you may not have listened to his speech.  Here’s a line from his speech:

      “We are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the people,”

      So indeed Trump did say he was returning power to the people.

      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/in-trump-inauguration-speech-trump-vows-to-give-power-back-to-the-people/

    2. Dave

      I like Trump because he is billionaire . Most of billionaires are employing lot of people and help people to live decent life. The professional propaganda’s  “Politicos”  creates  only millions of deplorable on food stamps and they don’t produce anything beside poverty for others .

      1. Jaroslaw, I get that many would view a billionaire as some kind of role model and want to believe that these people are smarter, more beautiful, more driven and still made it home every night to have dinner with the family.  I don’t trust how most people that wealthy made their money or what collateral damage they inflicted.

        More people were working good jobs and employed back in the years when they remember that “America was Great” and the wealth disparity was a whole lot narrower.  I’m no fan of how the Democratic Party has been asleep at the switch since the 1968 election.  The Republican Party has delivered even less.  I don’t trust Trump BECAUSE he is a billionaire (actually he may not be worth as much as he claims when you add up all the liabilities) and has never coached Saturday morning soccer games, helped his neighbor put up a fence or walked precincts for a candidate he knows personally.

        It is just possible, however, that he may deliver something good to prove he isn’t as bad as only he knows he is.  Remember, it was Richard Nixon who signed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, achieved detente with China and even enacted wage and price controls to rein in inflation.  And like the Nixon years, I’m not sure I’m willing to put up with all the bad things that happened just to get a few “good” crumbs.

        1. Dave

          We both don’t if Trump would be a good or bad President . Let’s wait at least 100 days than we would know  which direction  the country is  going . I don’t condemn people because their names are Trumps and because they are billionaires . Do you think that Republicans don’t like clean water and clean air . ?  America was a completely different country  when Nixon was a President . At that time the Soviet Union was a scare crow ,  Chinese people were riding bicycles and  they were all  dressed like Mao Zedong .   The Made in  America products were products you was proud of.  Today America is the  Chinese  and other countries economical colony . Even  the American flags are Made in China . Come on Dave . Your first love should be America than you love others .  Americans must take their country back from foreigners. My native Poland is located in bad spot between Germany and Poland and suffered a lot  because once in history got  an idea to became very out of control liberalism and open country for all the oppressed in Europe .

  6. Jerry

    It is interesting to me that you refer to those who are dependent on governmental assistance as “deplorables.” I wonder if that is how you would have thought of my mother, sister and me after our father died and we were dependent on social security ?

    1. Tia

      This is not what I was referring to . Social Security , sick or disable people , children who lost father or mother is the completely different matter.  Deplorable on the endless social programs because  no  employment due to  jobs were exported and outsourced to oversea and new jobs were not created is the urgent problem to resolve for the benefits of all Americans.  The high crimes and millions of people in prisons and jails and on food stamps is not a solution . This is the  dilution of this serious problem which could become very explosive if not resolved .

       

      1. Jerry… if  I’ve misread you twice, I apologize… think you were talking about folk who are in deplorable situations, not meaning to reflect on them as individuals… it was the Democrat candidate who clumped folk together as “deplorables”… pretty sure she meant Trump supporters… yet someone didn’t take offense to that, nor relate it to her family history… God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy…

        1. Howard

          You are correct . I am taking  about  about  the millions of folks which  were marginalized because of economy and  because of the wealthy shareholders shares in China and other countries which are more important for them than the Unites States of America and millions of people under poverty line .  I agree with you that the  God is great and beer is good .  Normally I drink Corona.

        2. Jerry… you made my evening… as an engineer, am always leery of my emotional/intuitive side… mess up there often… altho’ a tad off topic, I express my sincere apologies for when I criticized/made fun of your spelling/grammar in the past… God bless, have a wonderful new year… may peace, good health, etc. be with you and yours…

        3. Howard

          Don’t worry about and you no need to apologize . If you find something funny in my awkward English than  make fun of it  and let me know . If you would  correct sometimes my statements or ask me  what I  am up to  in my rant than would  I appreciate  and will not get defensive. Thank you for understanding .

    2. Tia… another correspondent doesn’t parse english the way perhaps we do… I was ‘bad’ to be “on his case” for that a few months back… he graciously (if somewhat defensively) explained his lack of formal english language education including spelling/grammar…  have learned to ‘interpret’ (I think)… obviously, he “pushed your button”… I have also now learned, from you (I think), what drives some of your ‘views of the world’, including the UBI thing… completely understandable, given what you disclosed your experience was…

Leave a Comment