Florida’s proposed House Bill 945, which would establish a state-run intelligence office with the authority to scrutinize individuals’ political views, has raised alarm among civil liberties advocates who warn it could lead to expanded domestic surveillance and erosion of First Amendment protections.
Activists in the Pacific Northwest have created a public database of license plates linked to unmarked ICE vehicles to increase transparency and reduce fear as immigration enforcement activity increases in the region.
The Israeli Defense Forces has been expanding its use of artificial intelligence technologies to surveil and target Palestinian civilians, raising concerns about reliance on unauthorized data extraction and computerized decision-making in paramilitary operations, and potentially violating international humanitarian law.
The Trump administration is expanding ICE’s surveillance powers to target American citizens who criticize or protest the agency, using social media monitoring technologies, location data, and cell phone hacking contracts, which civil liberties advocates warn is a violation of the First Amendment right to free speech.
Oakland’s Public Safety Committee rejected a proposed $2.25 million contract with private surveillance firm Flock Safety, citing concerns over privacy violations, data selling, and collaboration with federal immigration agencies.
Secure Justice has sued the City of Oakland for allegedly violating state law, its own municipal rules, and a 2024 settlement agreement governing the use of automated license plate reader technology.
The ACLU of Northern California filed a lawsuit against the city of San Jose, accusing it of conducting unconstitutional surveillance through automated license plate readers without warrants or judicial oversight.
Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi has raised concerns about ICE’s plan to outsource surveillance and enforcement duties to private contractors, warning that it could erode public trust in government and potentially expand surveillance beyond undocumented immigrants.
Pamela Wridt and Robert Sauve are suing the City of New York over the NYPD’s expanding use of surveillance cameras, alleging that the city’s practices violate constitutional protections for privacy, free speech, and association.
For decades, law enforcement agencies have used surveillance as a tool to monitor and control Black communities…
By the ACLU A second Trump administration threatens to use executive authority to further limit First Amendment…
By the ACLU A second Trump administration threatens to use executive authority to further limit First…
By David M. Greenwald Executive Editor Oakland, CA- Governor Newsom announced on Friday that California is installing…
By David M. Greenwald Executive Editor Davis, CA – On Tuesday night, I held my breath during…
We’re calling on the court to clarify that long-term police use of a surveillance camera targeted at…
By David M. Greenwald Executive Editor San Francisco, CA – This week newly appointed DA Brooke Jenkins…
By Delilah Hammons WASHINGTON, DC – The ACLU released a statement this week confirming the U.S. Supreme…
By The Vanguard Staff SAN FRANCISCO, CA – The ACLU of Northern California Wednesday confirmed what many…
The public has a right to know if and how often ICE and CBP are using Stingrays….
by Jon Callas This is the fourth and final in a series of essays about a proposal…